OBJECTIVE: To understand what contributes to good collaborative physician working relationships through identifying the factors that affect working relationships between generalist physicians and specialists. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. SETTING: University and community hospital inpatient family practice settings in Edmonton, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven physicians from various specialties who graduated between 1977 and 2001. METHODS: A grounded-theory approach, including constant comparison and creation of memorandums, helped to conceptualize the main concern and generated a framework for how the main concern was being resolved. A semistructured interview guide was developed and individual, in-depth interviews were audiotaped. Purposeful and theoretical sampling techniques were used. Three researchers participated in the analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: The findings suggested that when generalist physicians perceived that work had been imposed on them by specialists without negotiation, they felt overwhelmed by the workload. Differing priorities determined whether physicians were left holding the bag or sharing the load. In a system that valued technology and specialized knowledge and skills, the specialists were better able to control resources, set boundaries, and influence learners. This precipitated a culture of protecting valuable specialty resources, increasing physician isolation, and generalists feeling that they were left holding the bag. In order to reverse this cycle, it was important for physicians to develop good working relationships based on accessibility to needed expertise and tests, with negotiated agreements on how to share resources; mutual empowerment, including negotiation of roles and responsibilities to develop flexible relationships with a clear understanding of roles; and concern for fairness by sharing the load. CONCLUSION: Medical systems that value technology and focused interests might lead to someone being left holding the bag, contributing to generalists feeling overwhelmed and isolated within the system. A comprehensive system that values relationships might help to resolve issues created through perceived inequities in workload, disempowerment, and lack of understanding of roles.
OBJECTIVE: To understand what contributes to good collaborative physician working relationships through identifying the factors that affect working relationships between generalist physicians and specialists. DESIGN: Qualitative study using in-depth interviews. SETTING: University and community hospital inpatient family practice settings in Edmonton, Alta. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven physicians from various specialties who graduated between 1977 and 2001. METHODS: A grounded-theory approach, including constant comparison and creation of memorandums, helped to conceptualize the main concern and generated a framework for how the main concern was being resolved. A semistructured interview guide was developed and individual, in-depth interviews were audiotaped. Purposeful and theoretical sampling techniques were used. Three researchers participated in the analysis. MAIN FINDINGS: The findings suggested that when generalist physicians perceived that work had been imposed on them by specialists without negotiation, they felt overwhelmed by the workload. Differing priorities determined whether physicians were left holding the bag or sharing the load. In a system that valued technology and specialized knowledge and skills, the specialists were better able to control resources, set boundaries, and influence learners. This precipitated a culture of protecting valuable specialty resources, increasing physician isolation, and generalists feeling that they were left holding the bag. In order to reverse this cycle, it was important for physicians to develop good working relationships based on accessibility to needed expertise and tests, with negotiated agreements on how to share resources; mutual empowerment, including negotiation of roles and responsibilities to develop flexible relationships with a clear understanding of roles; and concern for fairness by sharing the load. CONCLUSION: Medical systems that value technology and focused interests might lead to someone being left holding the bag, contributing to generalists feeling overwhelmed and isolated within the system. A comprehensive system that values relationships might help to resolve issues created through perceived inequities in workload, disempowerment, and lack of understanding of roles.
Authors: David Price; Michelle Howard; Linda Hilts; Lisa Dolovich; Lisa McCarthy; Allyn E Walsh; Lynn Dykeman Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Donna P Manca; Stanley Varnhagen; Pamela Brett-MacLean; G Michael Allan; Olga Szafran; Allen Ausford; Carol Rowntree; Ismael Rumzan; Diana Turner Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Donna Manca; Stanley Varnhagen; Pamela Brett-MacLean; G Michael Allan; Olga Szafran Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: John G Scott; Deborah Cohen; Barbara Dicicco-Bloom; William L Miller; Kurt C Stange; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Linda Lee; George Heckman; Robert McKelvie; Philip Jong; Teresa D'Elia; Loretta M Hillier Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Elizabeth Lockhart; Gillian A Hawker; Noah M Ivers; Tara O'Brien; Geetha Mukerji; Pauline Pariser; Ian Stanaitis; Laura Pus; G Ross Baker Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.275