OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the important rewards and challenges that affect family physicians in Alberta. DESIGN: Web-based qualitative study using the Delphi method. SETTING: Province of Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight family physicians practising in Alberta. METHODS: The study website presented a description of the project, ethical information, a calendar of events, and contact information. Delphi surveys and demographic questionnaires were password protected. Five rounds of surveys were conducted between May 2004 and January 2005. Participants were notified of each round of surveys and prompted by e-mail if they did not respond. FINDINGS Participants identified 8 key rewards and 9 key challenges. The research team identified 2 additional challenges that were validated by participants. In order of perceived importance, key rewards were providing diverse and comprehensive care; providing preventive care; having relationships with patients and their families; being an immersed witness to the human condition; providing continuity of care and receiving ongoing feedback; having flexibility and control of practice and job security; maintaining and acquiring skills and knowledge; teaching and sharing knowledge and gaining experience and mentoring. The challenges, in order of perceived need to be addressed, were workload and time pressures and meeting demands; the need to promote the rewards of family practice to those considering joining the profession; overhead and income inequities; getting respect from specialists; the need to ensure that the rewards identified are not adversely affected by primary care reform; lack of availability of specialists, procedures, tests, and other resources; running a practice as a small business; paperwork, telephone calls, and forms; maintaining and acquiring skills and knowledge; patients' expectations; and medicolegal issues, insurance paperwork, and dealing with medical claims related to motor vehicle accidents. CONCLUSION: The rewards and challenges reported by participants outline the positive and negative factors in family practice. The challenges provide a focus for further work.
OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the important rewards and challenges that affect family physicians in Alberta. DESIGN: Web-based qualitative study using the Delphi method. SETTING: Province of Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight family physicians practising in Alberta. METHODS: The study website presented a description of the project, ethical information, a calendar of events, and contact information. Delphi surveys and demographic questionnaires were password protected. Five rounds of surveys were conducted between May 2004 and January 2005. Participants were notified of each round of surveys and prompted by e-mail if they did not respond. FINDINGS Participants identified 8 key rewards and 9 key challenges. The research team identified 2 additional challenges that were validated by participants. In order of perceived importance, key rewards were providing diverse and comprehensive care; providing preventive care; having relationships with patients and their families; being an immersed witness to the human condition; providing continuity of care and receiving ongoing feedback; having flexibility and control of practice and job security; maintaining and acquiring skills and knowledge; teaching and sharing knowledge and gaining experience and mentoring. The challenges, in order of perceived need to be addressed, were workload and time pressures and meeting demands; the need to promote the rewards of family practice to those considering joining the profession; overhead and income inequities; getting respect from specialists; the need to ensure that the rewards identified are not adversely affected by primary care reform; lack of availability of specialists, procedures, tests, and other resources; running a practice as a small business; paperwork, telephone calls, and forms; maintaining and acquiring skills and knowledge; patients' expectations; and medicolegal issues, insurance paperwork, and dealing with medical claims related to motor vehicle accidents. CONCLUSION: The rewards and challenges reported by participants outline the positive and negative factors in family practice. The challenges provide a focus for further work.
Authors: Tim Stokes; Carolyn Tarrant; Arch G Mainous; Henk Schers; George Freeman; Richard Baker Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2005 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: L Kuikka; M K Nevalainen; L Sjöberg; P Salokekkilä; H Karppinen; M Torppa; H Liira; J Eriksson; K H Pitkälä Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2012-02-19 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Donna Manca; Stanley Varnhagen; Pamela Brett-MacLean; G Michael Allan; Olga Szafran Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Gill Rowlands; Nina Khazaezadeh; Eugene Oteng-Ntim; Paul Seed; Suzanne Barr; Barry D Weiss Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Christy E Newman; Asha Persson; John B F de Wit; Robert H Reynolds; Peter G Canavan; Susan C Kippax; Michael R Kidd Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2013-03-21 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: B Le Floch; H Bastiaens; J Y Le Reste; H Lingner; R D Hoffman; S Czachowski; R Assenova; T H Koskela; Z Klemenc-Ketis; P Nabbe; A Sowinska; T Montier; L Peremans Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 2.497