Literature DB >> 23050793

General practitioners' reflections on referring: an asymmetric or non-dialogical process?

Olav Thorsen1, Miriam Hartveit, Anders Baerheim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identify and describe general practitioners' (GPs') reflections on and attitudes to the referral process and cooperation with hospital specialists.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured focus-group interviews with GPs analysed using Giorgi's method as modified by Malterud.
SETTING: Interviews conducted over four months from November 2010 to February 2011.
SUBJECTS: 17 female and 14 male GPs aged 29 to 61 years from 21 different practices, who had practised for 3-35 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Description of GPs' views on the referral process.
RESULTS: GPs wished for improved dialogue with the hospital specialists. The referral process was often considered as asymmetric and sometimes humiliating. GPs saw the benefit of using templates in the referral process, but were sceptical concerning the use of mandatory fixed formats.
CONCLUSIONS: The referral process is essential for good patient care between general practice and specialist services. GPs consider referring as asymmetric and sometimes humiliating. The dichotomy between the wish for mutual dialogue and the convenience of using templates should be kept in mind when assuring quality of the referral process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23050793      PMCID: PMC3520419          DOI: 10.3109/02813432.2012.711190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  21 in total

1.  Reducing waits and delays in the referral process.

Authors:  Mark Murray
Journal:  Fam Pract Manag       Date:  2002-03

2.  Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.

Authors:  K Malterud
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-08-11       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment?

Authors:  Christopher B Forrest
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

4.  Communication breakdown in the outpatient referral process.

Authors:  T K Gandhi; D F Sittig; M Franklin; A J Sussman; D G Fairchild; D W Bates
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  General practitioners' attitudes to variations in referral rates and how these could be managed.

Authors:  J Wright; J Wilkinson
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 6.  Part II. General practitioner-specialist referral process.

Authors:  L Piterman; S Koritsas
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.048

7.  Patients' unvoiced agendas in general practice consultations: qualitative study.

Authors:  C A Barry; C P Bradley; N Britten; F A Stevenson; N Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-05-06

Review 8.  Variation in GP referral rates: what can we learn from the literature?

Authors:  C A O'Donnell
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Regional variation in nonmedical factors affecting family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

Authors:  G R Langley; S Minkin; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  The Western Norway mental health interface study: a controlled intervention trial on referral letters between primary care and specialist mental health care.

Authors:  Miriam Hartveit; Eva Biringer; Kris Vanhaeht; Kjell Haug; Aslak Aslaksen
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 3.630

View more
  17 in total

1.  Prescribing of NOACs has outnumbered warfarin: exploring how physicians choose anticoagulant treatments.

Authors:  Anne Katrine Eek; Erik Øie; Anne Gerd Granas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Facilitators and barriers in diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis as described by general practitioners: a Danish study based on focus group interviews.

Authors:  Anne Sofie Baymler Lundberg; Bente Appel Esbensen; Martin Bach Jensen; Ellen Margrethe Hauge; Annette de Thurah
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 2.581

3.  The choice of alternatives to acute hospitalization: a descriptive study from Hallingdal, Norway.

Authors:  Oystein Lappegard; Per Hjortdahl
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  A nationwide postal survey on the perception of Malaysian public healthcare providers on family medicine specialists' (PERMFAMS) clinical performance, professional attitudes and research visibility.

Authors:  Boon-How Chew; Mazapuspavina Md Yasin; Ai-Theng Cheong; Mohd-Radzniwan A Rashid; Zuhra Hamzah; Mastura Ismail; Norsiah Ali; Baizury Bashah; Noridah Mohd-Salleh
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-05-06

5.  Recommended content of referral letters from general practitioners to specialised mental health care: a qualitative multi-perspective study.

Authors:  Miriam Hartveit; Olav Thorsen; Eva Biringer; Kris Vanhaecht; Benedicte Carlsen; Aslak Aslaksen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  The consultants' role in the referring process with general practitioners: partners or adjudicators? a qualitative study.

Authors:  Olav Thorsen; Miriam Hartveit; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.497

7.  Typologies in GPs' referral practice.

Authors:  Olav Thorsen; Miriam Hartveit; Jan Olav Johannessen; Lars Fosse; Geir Egil Eide; Jörn Schulz; Anders Bærheim
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Genecialist manifesto: overcoming the "class struggle" in medicine.

Authors:  Kentaro Iwata
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2013-04-11

9.  Could it be colorectal cancer? General practitioners' use of the faecal occult blood test and decision making--a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cecilia Högberg; Eva Samuelsson; Mikael Lilja; Eva Fhärm
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  A nationwide survey on the expectation of public healthcare providers on family medicine specialists in Malaysia-a qualitative analysis of 623 written comments.

Authors:  Boon-How Chew; Ai-Theng Cheong; Mastura Ismail; Zuhra Hamzah; Mohd-Radzniwan A-Rashid; Mazapuspavina Md-Yasin; Norsiah Ali
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.