Literature DB >> 21642605

Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection.

Octavian Toma1, Patty Suntrup, Andrei Stefanescu, Amy London, Matthew Mutch, Evan Kharasch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a significant risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs), for poorly understood reasons. SSIs are a major cause of morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and increased health care cost. Drug disposition in general is frequently altered in the obese. Preoperative antibiotic administration, achieving adequate tissue concentrations at the time of incision, is an essential strategy to prevent SSIs. Nonetheless, there is little information regarding antibiotic concentrations in obese surgical patients. This investigation tested the hypothesis that the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin may have delayed and/or diminished tissue penetration in the obese.
METHODS: Plasma and tissue concentrations of cefoxitin were determined in obese patients undergoing abdominal and pelvic surgery (body mass index 43 ± 10 kg/m(2), n = 14, 2 g cefoxitin) and in normal-weight patients and healthy volunteers (body mass index 20 ± 2 kg/m(2), n = 13, 1 g cefoxitin). Tissue concentrations were measured using a microdialysis probe in the subcutaneous layer of the abdomen, and in adipose tissue excised at the time of incision and wound closure.
RESULTS: Plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were approximately 2-fold higher in the obese patients because of the 2-fold-higher dose. Dose-normalized concentrations were higher, although AUCs were not significantly different. Measured and dose-normalized subcutaneous cefoxitin concentrations and AUCs in the obese patients were significantly lower than in the normal-weight subjects. There was an inverse relationship between cefoxitin tissue penetration (AUC(tissue)/AUC(plasma) ratio) and body mass index. Tissue penetration was substantially lower in the obese patients (0.08 ± 0.07 vs 0.37 ± 0.26, P < 0.05). Adipose tissue cefoxitin concentrations in obese patients were only 7.8 ± 7.3 and 2.7 ± 1.4 μg/g, respectively, at incision and closure, below the minimum inhibitory concentration of 8 and 16 μg/mL, respectively, for aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms.
CONCLUSION: Obese surgical patients have impaired tissue penetration of the prophylactic antibiotic cefoxitin, and inadequate tissue concentrations despite increased clinical dose (2 g). Inadequate tissue antibiotic concentrations may be a factor in the increased risk of SSIs in obese surgical patients. Additional studies are needed to define doses achieving adequate tissue concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21642605     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31821fff74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanming Zhou; Lupeng Wu; Xiudong Li; Xiurong Wu; Bin Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cefoxitin Plasma and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Concentration in Patients Undergoing Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Luigi Brunetti; Leonid Kagan; Glenn Forrester; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hongxia Lin; Steven Buyske; Ronald G Nahass
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 3.  Clinical implications of antibiotic pharmacokinetic principles in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  [Infection prevention by the anesthesia team].

Authors:  S Schulz-Stübner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena™ Customizable™: cosmetic and therapeutic results.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Caterina Tartaglione; Elisa Bolletta; Roberto Calamita; Giovanni Nicoletti; Marina Pierangeli; Luca Grassetti; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  Association Between Obesity and Wound Infection Following Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Usha Gurunathan; Simone Ramsay; Goran Mitrić; Mandy Way; Leesa Wockner; Paul Myles
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis in obese gravidae at time of cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Omar M Young; Imam H Shaik; Roxanna Twedt; Anna Binstock; Andrew D Althouse; Raman Venkataramanan; Hyagriv N Simhan; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Steve N Caritis
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Quantitative Assessment of Visceral Obesity and Postoperative Colon Cancer Outcomes.

Authors:  Oluwatobi O Ozoya; Erin M Siegel; Thejal Srikumar; Amanda M Bloomer; Amanda DeRenzis; David Shibata
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of a Weight-Based Dosing Regimen of Cefoxitin for Perioperative Surgical Prophylaxis in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Pierre Moine; Scott W Mueller; Jonathan A Schoen; Kevin B Rothchild; Douglas N Fish
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Impact of obesity on surgical site infection in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Jon Stuart Hourigan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.