Literature DB >> 25234139

The enhanced healing of a high-risk, clean, sutured surgical incision by prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy as delivered by Prevena™ Customizable™: cosmetic and therapeutic results.

Alessandro Scalise1, Caterina Tartaglione, Elisa Bolletta, Roberto Calamita, Giovanni Nicoletti, Marina Pierangeli, Luca Grassetti, Giovanni Di Benedetto.   

Abstract

According to the literature, incisional closure complications may range from postoperative surgical site infections, representing 17-22% of health care-associated infections, surgical wound dehiscence and formation of haematomas or seromas, and can lead to delayed or impaired incision healing. These kinds of situations are more common when wounds are closed under tension or in specific patient morbidities. Obesity, in particular, is associated with an impaired blood flow to tissues, predisposing the patient to increased risk of wound complications by various mechanisms. Incisional complications can become relevant economic burdens for health care systems because of an increase in the average length of hospital stay and readmissions, and additional medical and surgical procedures. Thus, a preventive therapy may have a critical role in the management of healing. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) technology as delivered by Prevena™ Customizable™ (Kinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, TX) has recently been the focus of a new investigation, as a prophylactic measure to prevent complications via immediate postoperative application in high-risk, clean, closed surgical incisions. The authors present a 62-year-old class II obese female, who underwent bilateral inguinal dermolipectomy. Prophylactic NPWT as delivered by Prevena™ was performed successfully over surgical incisions. Cosmetic and therapeutic results are shown.
© 2014 The Authors. International Wound Journal © 2014 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Negative pressure wound therapy; Surgical incision; Surgical wound infection; Wound healing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25234139      PMCID: PMC7950834          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  45 in total

1.  Subcutaneous stitch closure versus subcutaneous drain to prevent wound disruption after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Everett F Magann; Suneet P Chauhan; Sheryl Rodts-Palenik; Laura Bufkin; James N Martin; John C Morrison
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Evaluation of closed incision management with negative pressure wound therapy (CIM): hematoma/seroma and involvement of the lymphatic system.

Authors:  Deepak V Kilpadi; Mark R Cunningham
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Incisional vacuum-assisted closure therapy.

Authors:  Andreas H Gomoll; Albert Lin; Mitchel B Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Does negative pressure wound therapy have a role in preventing poststernotomy wound complications?

Authors:  Broadus Zane Atkins; Mary Kay Wooten; Jean Kistler; Kista Hurley; G Chad Hughes; Walter G Wolfe
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 5.  Topical negative pressure wound therapy: a review of its role and guidelines for its use in the management of acute wounds.

Authors:  Estas Bovill; Paul E Banwell; Luc Teot; Elof Eriksson; Colin Song; Jim Mahoney; Ronny Gustafsson; Raymund Horch; Anand Deva; Ian Whitworth
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 6.  A review of topical negative pressure therapy in wound healing: sufficient evidence?

Authors:  C M Mouës; F Heule; S E R Hovius
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of cefoxitin in obesity: implications for risk of surgical site infection.

Authors:  Octavian Toma; Patty Suntrup; Andrei Stefanescu; Amy London; Matthew Mutch; Evan Kharasch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Incisional negative pressure wound therapy after high-risk lower extremity fractures.

Authors:  James P Stannard; David A Volgas; Gerald McGwin; Rena L Stewart; William Obremskey; Thomas Moore; Jeffrey O Anglen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  Lacerations against Langer's lines: to glue or suture?

Authors:  H K Simon; W T Zempsky; T B Bruns; K M Sullivan
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.484

10.  Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Eli N Perencevich; Kenneth E Sands; Sara E Cosgrove; Edward Guadagnoli; Ellen Meara; Richard Platt
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  8 in total

1.  Closed Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy (ciNPT) Reduces Minor Local Complications in Post-bariatric Abdominoplasty Body Contouring: a Retrospective Case-Control Series.

Authors:  Silvio Abatangelo; Elisabetta Saporiti; Giorgio Giatsidis
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy. A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Alessandro Scalise; Roberto Calamita; Caterina Tartaglione; Marina Pierangeli; Elisa Bolletta; Matteo Gioacchini; Rosaria Gesuita; Giovanni Di Benedetto
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncological Breast Surgery: Comparison with Standard Care Dressings.

Authors:  Pietro M Ferrando; Ada Ala; Riccardo Bussone; Laura Bergamasco; Federica Actis Perinetti; Fabrizio Malan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-06-15

Review 4.  Closed incision negative pressure therapy: international multidisciplinary consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Christian Willy; Animesh Agarwal; Charles A Andersen; Giorgio De Santis; Allen Gabriel; Onnen Grauhan; Omar M Guerra; Benjamin A Lipsky; Mahmoud B Malas; Lars L Mathiesen; Devinder P Singh; V Sreenath Reddy
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Incisional negative pressure wound therapy to reduce perineal wound infection after abdominoperineal resection.

Authors:  Tomoaki Kaneko; Kimihiko Funahashi; Mitstunori Ushigome; Satoru Kagami; Mayu Goto; Takamaru Koda; Akiharu Kurihara
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Reduction of groin wound complications in vascular surgery patients using closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT): a prospective, randomised, single-institution study.

Authors:  Sebastian P Pleger; Nadine Nink; Meshal Elzien; Alexander Kunold; Ahmed Koshty; Andreas Böning
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Effect of a new incision management system (PREVENA®) on wound healing after endophlebectomy of the common femoral vein: a case series.

Authors:  A Gombert; M E Barbati; C Wittens; J Grommes; H Jalaie
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-27

8.  Cellular benefits of single-use negative pressure wound therapy demonstrated in a novel ex vivo human skin wound model.

Authors:  Holly N Wilkinson; Francesca L Longhorne; Elizabeth R Roberts; Varuni R Brownhill; Matthew J Hardman
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 3.401

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.