BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the severity of resting perfusion abnormalities assessed by the summed rest score (SRS) would be associated with a higher rate of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: A subset of 240 subjects from HF-ACTION underwentresting technetium-99m tetrofosmin-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Images were evaluated using a 17-segment model to derive the SRS and additional nuclear variables. RESULTS: After adjusting for prespecified covariates, SRS was significantly associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.00, P = .04), with a higher SRS corresponding to lower risk of an event. This association was not present in the unadjusted analysis. The relationship between SRS and the primary outcome was likely due to a higher event ratein patients with ischemic HF and a low SRS. The LV phase SD was not predictive of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01, P = .49). In a post hoc analysis, nuclear variables provided incremental prognostic information when added to clinical information (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS:Gated SPECT MPI provides important information in patients with HF and reduced LVEF. In the adjusted analysis, SRS has an unexpected relationship with the primary end point. Phase SD was not associated with the primary end point. Rest-gated SPECT MPI provides incrementally greater prognostic information than clinical information alone.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that the severity of resting perfusion abnormalities assessed by the summed rest score (SRS) would be associated with a higher rate of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF). METHODS: A subset of 240 subjects from HF-ACTION underwent resting technetium-99m tetrofosmin-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Images were evaluated using a 17-segment model to derive the SRS and additional nuclear variables. RESULTS: After adjusting for prespecified covariates, SRS was significantly associated with the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.00, P = .04), with a higher SRS corresponding to lower risk of an event. This association was not present in the unadjusted analysis. The relationship between SRS and the primary outcome was likely due to a higher event ratein patients with ischemic HF and a low SRS. The LV phase SD was not predictive of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.01, P = .49). In a post hoc analysis, nuclear variables provided incremental prognostic information when added to clinical information (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Gated SPECT MPI provides important information in patients with HF and reduced LVEF. In the adjusted analysis, SRS has an unexpected relationship with the primary end point. Phase SD was not associated with the primary end point. Rest-gated SPECT MPI provides incrementally greater prognostic information than clinical information alone.
Authors: Claudia Ypenburg; Rutger J van Bommel; C Jan Willem Borleffs; Gabe B Bleeker; Eric Boersma; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M J Zellweger; H C Lewin; S Lai; E A Dubois; J D Friedman; G Germano; X Kang; T Sharir; D S Berman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: T Sharir; D S Berman; H C Lewin; J D Friedman; I Cohen; R Miranda; R D Agafitei; G Germano Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Leslee J Shaw; Robert C Hendel; Gary V Heller; Salvador Borges-Neto; Manuel Cerqueira; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alessia Gimelli; Giuseppe Rossi; Patrizia Landi; Paolo Marzullo; Giorgio Iervasi; Antonio L'abbate; Daniele Rovai Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christopher M O'Connor; David J Whellan; Kerry L Lee; Steven J Keteyian; Lawton S Cooper; Stephen J Ellis; Eric S Leifer; William E Kraus; Dalane W Kitzman; James A Blumenthal; David S Rendall; Nancy Houston Miller; Jerome L Fleg; Kevin A Schulman; Robert S McKelvie; Faiez Zannad; Ileana L Piña Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Mark A Trimble; Salvador Borges-Neto; Emily F Honeycutt; Linda K Shaw; Robert Pagnanelli; Ji Chen; Ami E Iskandrian; Ernest V Garcia; Eric J Velazquez Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2008 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Prem Soman; Avijit Lahiri; Jennifer H Mieres; Dennis A Calnon; David Wolinsky; George A Beller; Tina Sias; Kenneth Burnham; Laurence Conway; Peter A McCullough; Edouard Daher; Mary N Walsh; Joseph Wight; Gary V Heller; James E Udelson Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera; Jesús Peteiro; Nemesio Alvarez-García; Francisco J Broullón; Victor X Mosquera; Lourdes García-Bueno; Luis Ferro; Alfonso Castro-Beiras Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-05-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Soohun Chun; Jack V Tu; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Peter C Austin; Xuesong Wang; Daniel Levy; Douglas S Lee Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 8.790