Literature DB >> 18948667

Incremental prognostic value of cardiac function assessed by ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT for the prediction of future acute coronary syndrome.

Naoya Matsumoto1, Yuichi Sato, Yasuyuki Suzuki, Shu Kasama, Yoshimochi Nakano, Masahiko Kato, Shunichi Yoda, Takaaki Miki, Jun Iida, Taeko Kunimasa, Futoshi Tadehara, Ken Nagao, Atsushi Hirayama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of ECG-gated rest 201Tl/stress 99mTc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of acute coronary syndrome (ACS: myocardial infarction (MI) and unstable angina (UA)) and the implications of ejection fraction (EF) has not yet been defined in Japanese. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The 1,895 patients were followed up for the occurrence ACS. The mean follow-up interval was 26.9+/-15.5 months. The 142 patients with revascularization within 60 days were censored. Summed stress score (SSS) and summed difference score (SDS) were calculated. The 19 MI and 29 UA occurred (1.1% and 1.6%, respectively). Univariate Cox analysis showed that hypertension (Wald 5.09, p<0.05), poststress EF (Wald 10.9, p<0.01), SSS (Wald 12.4, p<0.001) and SDS (Wald 18.7, p<0.001) were significant predictors of ACS. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that hypertension (Wald 4.27, p<0.05) and SDS (Wald 8.59, p<0.01) were independent predictors. When multiple clinical risk factors (number of coronary risk factors > or =2), significant ischemia (SDS > or =4) and low EF (EF <45%) were applied to multivariate Cox analysis, the combination of significant ischemia and low EF showed the highest predictive value (Wald 11.9; p<0.001) for future ACS.
CONCLUSION: Poststress EF added incremental prognostic value for the prediction of ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18948667     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-0488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  5 in total

1.  Risk stratification based on J-ACCESS risk models with myocardial perfusion imaging: Risk versus outcomes of patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakajima; Satoko Nakamura; Hiroki Hase; Yasuchika Takeishi; Shigeyuki Nishimura; Yuhei Kawano; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Relationship of technetium-99m tetrofosmin-gated rest single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging to death and hospitalization in heart failure patients: results from the nuclear ancillary study of the HF-ACTION trial.

Authors:  Allen E Atchley; Ami E Iskandrian; Dan Bensimhon; Stephen J Ellis; Dalane W Kitzman; Linda K Shaw; Robert A Pagnanelli; David J Whellan; Julius M Gardin; Andrew Kao; Khaled Abdul-Nour; Greg Ewald; Mary Norine Walsh; William E Kraus; Christopher M O'Connor; Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 3.  Does myocardial perfusion imaging provide incremental prognostic information to left ventricular ejection fraction?

Authors:  Daniel W Mudrick; Eric Velazquez; Salvador Borges-Neto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Prediction of multivessel coronary artery disease and candidates for stress-only imaging using multivariable models with myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Yuji Kunita; Kenichi Nakajima; Tomoaki Nakata; Takashi Kudo; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 2.258

Review 5.  Normal values and standardization of parameters in nuclear cardiology: Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine working group database.

Authors:  Kenichi Nakajima; Naoya Matsumoto; Tokuo Kasai; Shinro Matsuo; Keisuke Kiso; Koichi Okuda
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.