Literature DB >> 21641122

Delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) for radiation treatment planning of locally advanced rectal cancer using information from MRI or FDG-PET/CT: a prospective study.

Morten Brændengen1, Karl Hansson, Calin Radu, Albert Siegbahn, Hans Jacobsson, Bengt Glimelius.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate delineation of target volumes is important to maximize radiation dose to the tumor and minimize it to nontumor tissue. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are standard imaging modalities in rectal cancer. The aim was to explore whether functional imaging with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), combined with CT (FDG-PET/CT) gives additional information to standard pretreatment evaluation and changes the shape and size of the gross tumor volume (GTV). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2007 to 2009, 77 consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were prospectively screened for inclusion in the study at two university hospitals in Sweden, and 68 patients were eligible. Standard GTV was delineated using information from clinical examination, CT, and MRI (GTV-MRI). Thereafter, a GTV-PET was defined in the fused PET-CT, and the target volume delineations were compared for total volume, overlap, and mismatch. Pathologic uptake suspect of metastases was also registered.
RESULTS: The median volume of GTV-MRI was larger than that of GTV-PET: 111 cm(3) vs. 87 cm(3) (p < 0.001). In many cases, the GTV-MRI contained the GTV defined on the PET/CT images as subvolumes, but when a GTV total was calculated after the addition of GTV-PET to GTV-MRI, the volume increased, with median 11% (range, 0.5-72%). New lesions were seen in 15% of the patients for whom PET/CT was used.
CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET/CT facilitates and adds important information to the standard delineation procedure of locally advanced rectal cancer, mostly resulting in a smaller GTV, but a larger total GTV using the union of GTV-MRI and GTV-PET. New lesions were sometimes seen, potentially changing the treatment strategy.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641122     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.03.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

Review 1.  [The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A O Schäfer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Semiautomatic tumor segmentation with multimodal images in a conditional random field framework.

Authors:  Yu-Chi Hu; Michael Grossberg; Gikas Mageras
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 3.  Current Methods to Define Metabolic Tumor Volume in Positron Emission Tomography: Which One is Better?

Authors:  Hyung-Jun Im; Tyler Bradshaw; Meiyappan Solaiyappan; Steve Y Cho
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-09-19

4.  Neoadjuvant PET and MRI-based intensity modulated radiotherapy leads to less toxicity and improved pathologic response rates in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  John M David; Gillian Gresham; Salma K Jabbour; Matthew Deek; Shant Thomassian; John M Robertson; Neil B Newman; Joseph M Herman; Arsen Osipov; Peyman Kabolizadeh; Richard Tuli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-08

Review 5.  Clinical application of multimodality imaging in radiotherapy treatment planning for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yan Yang Wang; Hong Zhe
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Target volume delineation of anal cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Espen Rusten; Bernt Louni Rekstad; Christine Undseth; Ghazwan Al-Haidari; Bettina Hanekamp; Eivor Hernes; Taran Paulsen Hellebust; Eirik Malinen; Marianne Grønlie Guren
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 7.  On a prolonged interval between rectal cancer (chemo)radiotherapy and surgery.

Authors:  Bengt Glimelius
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 2.384

8.  An assessment of set up position for MRI scanning for the purposes of rectal cancer radiotherapy treatment planning.

Authors:  Ewa Juresic; Gary P Liney; Robba Rai; Joseph Descalar; Mark Lee; Karen Wong; Daniel Moses; Jacqueline Veera; Lois Holloway
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-03

9.  Radiotherapy planning using MRI.

Authors:  Maria A Schmidt; Geoffrey S Payne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy.

Authors:  Constantin Lapa; Ursula Nestle; Nathalie L Albert; Christian Baues; Ambros Beer; Andreas Buck; Volker Budach; Rebecca Bütof; Stephanie E Combs; Thorsten Derlin; Matthias Eiber; Wolfgang P Fendler; Christian Furth; Cihan Gani; Eleni Gkika; Anca-L Grosu; Christoph Henkenberens; Harun Ilhan; Steffen Löck; Simone Marnitz-Schulze; Matthias Miederer; Michael Mix; Nils H Nicolay; Maximilian Niyazi; Christoph Pöttgen; Claus M Rödel; Imke Schatka; Sarah M Schwarzenboeck; Andrei S Todica; Wolfgang Weber; Simone Wegen; Thomas Wiegel; Constantinos Zamboglou; Daniel Zips; Klaus Zöphel; Sebastian Zschaeck; Daniela Thorwarth; Esther G C Troost
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.