Literature DB >> 22526933

[The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer].

A O Schäfer1, M Langer, T Baumann.   

Abstract

The ongoing diversification of treatment strategies for rectal cancer justifies the demand for highly specialized radiological imaging. Currently, numerous studies have underlined the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to determine those parameters that are critical for therapeutic decision-making and prognosis in rectal cancer. Computed tomography (CT) does not meet the criteria of a first line diagnostic procedure with regard to local staging but will remain the workhorse in the search for distant metastases. The increasing acceptance of extended MRI-based concepts will, however, improve cost-effectiveness and simplify patient management. Response evaluation and detection of recurrent disease are the major indications for positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, which is currently not routinely recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22526933     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-011-2204-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  32 in total

Review 1.  Continuously moving table MRI in oncology.

Authors:  A-O Schaefer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2010-10-04

2.  Quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with primary rectal cancer: correlation with FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Jing Gu; Pek-Lan Khong; Silun Wang; Queenie Chan; Wailun Law; Jingbo Zhang
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Rectal cancer: assessment of complete response to preoperative combined radiation therapy with chemotherapy--conventional MR volumetry versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging.

Authors:  Luís Curvo-Semedo; Doenja M J Lambregts; Monique Maas; Thomas Thywissen; Rana T Mehsen; Guido Lammering; Geerard L Beets; Filipe Caseiro-Alves; Regina G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Rectal cancer: mucinous carcinoma on magnetic resonance imaging indicates poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation.

Authors:  Katja Oberholzer; Matthias Menig; Andreas Kreft; Astrid Schneider; Theodor Junginger; Achim Heintz; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; Andreas M Hötker; Torsten Hansen; Christoph Düber; Heinz Schmidberger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI for the detection of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  M J Gollub; D H Gultekin; O Akin; R K Do; J L Fuqua; M Gonen; D Kuk; M Weiser; L Saltz; D Schrag; K Goodman; P Paty; J Guillem; G M Nash; L Temple; J Shia; L H Schwartz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience.

Authors:  Uday B Patel; Fiona Taylor; Lennart Blomqvist; Christopher George; Hywel Evans; Paris Tekkis; Philip Quirke; David Sebag-Montefiore; Brendan Moran; Richard Heald; Ashley Guthrie; Nicola Bees; Ian Swift; Kjell Pennert; Gina Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Local staging of rectal cancer: a review of imaging.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  MRI predictive factors for long-term outcomes of low rectal tumours.

Authors:  Oliver C Shihab; Fiona Taylor; Gisella Salerno; Richard J Heald; Philip Quirke; Brendan J Moran; Gina Brown
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Whole-body MR imaging versus sequential multimodal diagnostic algorithm for staging patients with rectal cancer: cost analysis.

Authors:  A Huppertz; M Schmidt; M Wagner; O Puettcher; P Asbach; J Strassburg; F Stöckmann; O Schöffski; M H Maurer
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2010-06-01

Review 10.  Biomarkers for response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Kuremsky; Joel E Tepper; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Role of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer : Is MRI-based selection a future model?].

Authors:  Y Kulu; T Hackert; J Debus; M-A Weber; M W Büchler; A Ulrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  [Local imaging of rectal cancer--update 2015: MRI as imaging biomarker].

Authors:  A-O Schäfer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.635

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.