Literature DB >> 21640906

KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Jessica S Rosenberg1, Frederick R Cross, Hironori Funabiki.   

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays anaphase onset until kinetochores accomplish bioriented microtubule attachments [1]. Although several centromeric and kinetochore kinases, including Aurora B, regulate kinetochore-microtubule attachment and/or SAC activation [2-4], the molecular mechanism that translates bioriented attachment into SAC silencing remains unclear [5]. Employing a method to rapidly induce exact gene replacement in budding yeast [6], we show here that the binding of protein phosphatase 1 (PP1/Glc7) to the evolutionarily conserved RVSF motif of the kinetochore protein Spc105 (KNL1/Blinkin/CASC5) is essential for viability by silencing the SAC, while it plays an auxiliary nonessential role for physical chromosome segregation. Although Aurora B may inhibit this binding, persistent PP1-Spc105 interaction does not affect chromosome segregation and is insufficient to silence the SAC in the absence of microtubules, indicating that dynamic regulation of this interaction is dispensable. However, the amount of PP1 targeted to kinetochores must be finely tuned, because recruitment of either no or one extra copy of PP1 to Spc105 is detrimental, illustrating the vital impact of targeting an exiguous fraction of PP1 to the kinetochore. We propose that the PP1-Spc105 interaction enables local regulation of dynamic phosphorylation and dephosphorylation at the kinetochore to couple microtubule attachment and SAC silencing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640906      PMCID: PMC3109435          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  31 in total

1.  Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network.

Authors:  Amy Hin Yan Tong; Guillaume Lesage; Gary D Bader; Huiming Ding; Hong Xu; Xiaofeng Xin; James Young; Gabriel F Berriz; Renee L Brost; Michael Chang; YiQun Chen; Xin Cheng; Gordon Chua; Helena Friesen; Debra S Goldberg; Jennifer Haynes; Christine Humphries; Grace He; Shamiza Hussein; Lizhu Ke; Nevan Krogan; Zhijian Li; Joshua N Levinson; Hong Lu; Patrice Ménard; Christella Munyana; Ainslie B Parsons; Owen Ryan; Raffi Tonikian; Tania Roberts; Anne-Marie Sdicu; Jesse Shapiro; Bilal Sheikh; Bernhard Suter; Sharyl L Wong; Lan V Zhang; Hongwei Zhu; Christopher G Burd; Sean Munro; Chris Sander; Jasper Rine; Jack Greenblatt; Matthias Peter; Anthony Bretscher; Graham Bell; Frederick P Roth; Grant W Brown; Brenda Andrews; Howard Bussey; Charles Boone
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  S Biggins; A W Murray
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes.

Authors:  J Y Hsu; Z W Sun; X Li; M Reuben; K Tatchell; D K Bishop; J M Grushcow; C J Brame; J A Caldwell; D F Hunt; R Lin; M M Smith; C D Allis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-08-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Sensing centromere tension: Aurora B and the regulation of kinetochore function.

Authors:  Michael A Lampson; Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 20.808

5.  Isolation and characterization of chromosome-gain and increase-in-ploidy mutants in yeast.

Authors:  C S Chan; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast.

Authors:  Sina Ghaemmaghami; Won-Ki Huh; Kiowa Bower; Russell W Howson; Archana Belle; Noah Dephoure; Erin K O'Shea; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Type 1 protein phosphatase acts in opposition to IpL1 protein kinase in regulating yeast chromosome segregation.

Authors:  L Francisco; W Wang; C S Chan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Mitotic spindle integrity and kinetochore function linked by the Duo1p/Dam1p complex.

Authors:  I M Cheeseman; M Enquist-Newman; T Müller-Reichert; D G Drubin; G Barnes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2001-01-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast.

Authors:  K G Hardwick; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast.

Authors:  Emily S Gillett; Christopher W Espelin; Peter K Sorger
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-02-09       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  114 in total

Review 1.  The Renaissance or the cuckoo clock.

Authors:  Jonathon Pines; Iain Hagan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  A brief history of error.

Authors:  Andrew W Murray
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 3.  Connecting up and clearing out: how kinetochore attachment silences the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Jagesh V Shah
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 4.  Regulatory mechanisms of kinetochore-microtubule interaction in mitosis.

Authors:  Kozo Tanaka
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 5.  How the SAC gets the axe: Integrating kinetochore microtubule attachments with spindle assembly checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Shivangi Agarwal; Dileep Varma
Journal:  Bioarchitecture       Date:  2015-10-02

6.  Mitotic phosphatase activity is required for MCC maintenance during the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Kristen M Foss; Alexander C Robeson; Sally Kornbluth; Liguo Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  Reconstituting the kinetochore–microtubule interface: what, why, and how.

Authors:  Bungo Akiyoshi; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  The signaling network that silences the spindle assembly checkpoint upon the establishment of chromosome bipolar attachment.

Authors:  Fengzhi Jin; Yanchang Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Linked in: formation and regulation of microtubule attachments during chromosome segregation.

Authors:  Dhanya K Cheerambathur; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 10.  Microtubule attachment and spindle assembly checkpoint signalling at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Emily A Foley; Tarun M Kapoor
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 94.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.