Literature DB >> 21640726

Water loss in insects: an environmental change perspective.

Steven L Chown1, Jesper G Sørensen, John S Terblanche.   

Abstract

In the context of global environmental change much of the focus has been on changing temperatures. However, patterns of rainfall and water availability have also been changing and are expected to continue doing so. In consequence, understanding the responses of insects to water availability is important, especially because it has a pronounced influence on insect activity, distribution patterns, and species richness. Here we therefore provide a critical review of key questions that either are being or need to be addressed in this field. First, an overview of insect behavioural responses to changing humidity conditions and the mechanisms underlying sensing of humidity variation is provided. The primary sensors in insects belong to the temperature receptor protein superfamily of cation channels. Temperature-activated transient receptor potential ion channels, or thermoTRPs, respond to a diverse range of stimuli and may be a primary integrator of sensory information, such as environmental temperature and moisture. Next we touch briefly on the components of water loss, drawing attention to a new, universal model of the water costs of gas exchange and its implications for responses to a warming, and in places drying, world. We also provide an overview of new understanding of the role of the sub-elytral chamber for water conservation, and developments in understanding of the role of cuticular hydrocarbons in preventing water loss. Because of an increasing focus on the molecular basis of responses to dehydration stress we touch briefly on this area, drawing attention to the role of sugars, heat shock proteins, aquaporins, and LEA proteins. Next we consider phenotypic plasticity or acclimation responses in insect water balance after initial exposures to altered humidity, temperature or nutrition. Although beneficial acclimation has been demonstrated in several instances, this is not always the case. Laboratory studies show that responses to selection for enhanced ability to survive water stress do evolve and that genetic variation for traits underlying such responses does exist in many species. However, in others, especially tropical, typically narrowly distributed species, this appears not to be the case. Using the above information we then demonstrate that habitat alteration, climate change, biological invasions, pollution and overexploitation are likely to be having considerable effects on insect populations mediated through physiological responses (or the lack thereof) to water stress, and that these effects may often be non-intuitive.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640726     DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2011.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Insect Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1910            Impact factor:   2.354


  66 in total

1.  Floral humidity as a reliable sensory cue for profitability assessment by nectar-foraging hawkmoths.

Authors:  Martin von Arx; Joaquín Goyret; Goggy Davidowitz; Robert A Raguso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Trait-based approaches to conservation physiology: forecasting environmental change risks from the bottom up.

Authors:  Steven L Chown
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Insect capa neuropeptides impact desiccation and cold tolerance.

Authors:  Selim Terhzaz; Nicholas M Teets; Pablo Cabrero; Louise Henderson; Michael G Ritchie; Ronald J Nachman; Julian A T Dow; David L Denlinger; Shireen-A Davies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Eye and wing structure closely reflects the visual ecology of dung beetles.

Authors:  Claudia Tocco; Marie Dacke; Marcus Byrne
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Desiccation Resistance and Micro-Climate Adaptation: Cuticular Hydrocarbon Signatures of Different Argentine Ant Supercolonies Across California.

Authors:  Jan Buellesbach; Brian A Whyte; Elizabeth Cash; Joshua D Gibson; Kelsey J Scheckel; Rebecca Sandidge; Neil D Tsutsui
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Animal water balance drives top-down effects in a riparian forest-implications for terrestrial trophic cascades.

Authors:  Kevin E McCluney; John L Sabo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Hydroregulation in a tropical dry-skinned ectotherm.

Authors:  Anna F V Pintor; Lin Schwarzkopf; Andrew K Krockenberger
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Desiccation stress induces developmental heterochrony in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Leena Thorat; Dasharath P Oulkar; Kaushik Banerjee; Bimalendu B Nath
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Selection on phenotypic plasticity favors thermal canalization.

Authors:  Erik I Svensson; Miguel Gomez-Llano; John T Waller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genomic Trajectories to Desiccation Resistance: Convergence and Divergence Among Replicate Selected Drosophila Lines.

Authors:  Philippa C Griffin; Sandra B Hangartner; Alexandre Fournier-Level; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.