Literature DB >> 30830308

Eye and wing structure closely reflects the visual ecology of dung beetles.

Claudia Tocco1, Marie Dacke2,3, Marcus Byrne2.   

Abstract

An important resource partitioning strategy allowing dung beetles to coexist in the same habitat, while utilising the same food, is species' separation of activity times. After establishing the diel activity period of three closely related, co-occurring dung beetles, we examined their eye and wing morphology. Absolute and relative eye size, and facet size were greater in the nocturnal Escarabaeus satyrus, followed by the crepuscular Scarabaeus zambesianus and then the diurnal Kheper lamarcki. The diurnal K. lamarcki had the highest wing aspect ratio (long, narrow wings), followed by the crepuscular S. zambesianus and the nocturnal E. satyrus (short, broad wings), suggesting that dim-light active species fly slower than diurnal species. In addition, the two species active in dim light had a lower wing loading than the diurnal species, indicating the need for greater manoeuvrability in the dark. Analyses of wing shape revealed that the diurnal K. lamarcki wing had a proportionally larger jugal and anal region than both dim light species. Our results show that different species of dung beetles have a combination of optical and morphological wing adaptations to support their foraging activities in diverse light conditions.

Keywords:  Aspect ratio; Diel activity period; Eye size; Scarabaeini; Wing loading

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30830308     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-019-01324-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  32 in total

1.  A specialized dorsal rim area for polarized light detection in the compound eye of the scarab beetle Pachysoma striatum.

Authors:  M Dacke; P Nordström; C H Scholtz; E J Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-03-13       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Visual cues used by ball-rolling dung beetles for orientation.

Authors:  Marcus Byrne; Marie Dacke; Peter Nordström; Clarke Scholtz; Eric Warrant
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Lunar orientation in a beetle.

Authors:  Marie Dacke; Marcus J Byrne; Clarke H Scholtz; Eric J Warrant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Vision and visual navigation in nocturnal insects.

Authors:  Eric Warrant; Marie Dacke
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 19.686

5.  Beyond the wing planform: morphological differentiation between migratory and nonmigratory dragonfly species.

Authors:  C M Suárez-Tovar; C E Sarmiento
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Changes in temperature and light alter the flight speed of hornets (Vespa crabro L.).

Authors:  Sebastian Spiewok; Erik Schmolz
Journal:  Physiol Biochem Zool       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 2.247

7.  MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Patterns of daily flight activity in onitine dung beetles (Scarabaeinae: Onitini).

Authors:  Stanley Caveney; Clarke H Scholtz; Peter McIntyre
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  How bumblebees use lateral and ventral optic flow cues for position control in environments of different proximity.

Authors:  Nellie Linander; Emily Baird; Marie Dacke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Navigational efficiency of nocturnal Myrmecia ants suffers at low light levels.

Authors:  Ajay Narendra; Samuel F Reid; Chloé A Raderschall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multimodal cue integration in the dung beetle compass.

Authors:  Marie Dacke; Adrian T A Bell; James J Foster; Emily J Baird; Martin F Strube-Bloss; Marcus J Byrne; Basil El Jundi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genomic and Mitochondrial Data Identify Different Species Boundaries in Aposematically Polymorphic Eniclases Net-Winged Beetles (Coleoptera: Lycidae).

Authors:  Matej Bocek; Michal Motyka; Dominik Kusy; Ladislav Bocak
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Morphological diversification has led to inter-specific variation in elastic wing deformation during flight in scarab beetles.

Authors:  Y Meresman; J F Husak; R Ben-Shlomo; G Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Visible beyond Violet: How Butterflies Manage Ultraviolet.

Authors:  David Stella; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.