Literature DB >> 21638215

Wireless communication fields and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a literature review.

Martin Röösli1, Kerstin Hug.   

Abstract

This is an update of a previous systematic review on the association between radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure and health-related quality of life that included studies published before August 2007 [1]. Since then, nine randomized trials addressed short-term exposures from close-to-body RF-EMF sources such as mobile phones, and two observational studies investigated the effects of mobile phone use on health-related quality of life. Six randomized trials addressed short-term far-field exposure arising, for instance, from mobile phone base stations, and eight studies evaluated the effects of environmental far-field RF-EMF exposure. In most of the randomized trials, no exposure-response association was observed. The sporadically reported associations did not show a consistent pattern regarding the type of symptoms or the direction of the effects (increase/decrease). Similarly, most of the recent observational studies did not show associations between RF-EMF exposure and non-specific symptoms. However, the exposure gradients were small and possible exposure misclassification is a limitation of these studies. Longitudinal studies as well as studies in children and adolescents are scarce. In summary, recent research did not indicate health-related quality of life to be affected by RF-EMF exposure in our everyday environment. Furthermore, none of the studies showed that individuals with self-reported electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) were more susceptible to RF-EMF than the rest of the population. Nevertheless, the rapid technological development and anticipated increase in exposure levels warrant the conduct of further longitudinal studies. Due to the widespread use of wireless communication technologies potential adverse health effects would have major public health consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21638215     DOI: 10.1007/s10354-011-0883-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5341


  33 in total

1.  Classification of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) for epidemiological research: Evaluation of different exposure assessment methods.

Authors:  Patrizia Frei; Evelyn Mohler; Alfred Bürgi; Jürg Fröhlich; Georg Neubauer; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Effects of everyday radiofrequency electromagnetic-field exposure on sleep quality: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Evelyn Mohler; Patrizia Frei; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Jürg Fröhlich; Georg Neubauer; Martin Röösli
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations.

Authors:  Martin Röösli; Patrizia Frei; Evelyn Mohler; Kerstin Hug
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Do mobile phone base stations affect sleep of residents? Results from an experimental double-blind sham-controlled field study.

Authors:  Heidi Danker-Hopfe; Hans Dorn; Christian Bornkessel; Cornelia Sauter
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.937

5.  Can exposure to a terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA)-like signal cause symptoms? A randomised double-blind provocation study.

Authors:  Rosa Nieto-Hernandez; Jonathan Williams; Anthony J Cleare; Sabine Landau; Simon Wessely; G James Rubin
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Lena Hillert; Niklas Berglind; Bengt B Arnetz; Tom Bellander
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Cognitive function and symptoms in adults and adolescents in relation to rf radiation from UMTS base stations.

Authors:  Ingunn S Riddervold; Gert F Pedersen; Niels T Andersen; Anders D Pedersen; Jørgen B Andersen; Robert Zachariae; Lars Mølhave; Torben Sigsgaard; Søren K Kjaergaard
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.010

8.  Electrosensibility and electromagnetic hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Norbert Leitgeb; Jörg Schröttner
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.010

9.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields.

Authors:  G Berg-Beckhoff; M Blettner; B Kowall; J Breckenkamp; B Schlehofer; S Schmiedel; C Bornkessel; U Reis; P Potthoff; J Schüz
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Hypersensitivity to RF fields emitted from CDMA cellular phones: a provocation study.

Authors:  Ki Chang Nam; Ju Hyung Lee; Hyung Wook Noh; Eun Jong Cha; Nam Hyun Kim; Deok Won Kim
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.010

View more
  9 in total

1.  Is There a Connection Between Electrosensitivity and Electrosensibility? A Replication Study.

Authors:  Renáta Szemerszky; Mónika Gubányi; Dorottya Árvai; Zsuzsanna Dömötör; Ferenc Köteles
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Metabolic and genetic screening of electromagnetic hypersensitive subjects as a feasible tool for diagnostics and intervention.

Authors:  Chiara De Luca; Jeffrey Chung Sheun Thai; Desanka Raskovic; Eleonora Cesareo; Daniela Caccamo; Arseny Trukhanov; Liudmila Korkina
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 4.711

3.  Subjective Symptoms Related to GSM Radiation from Mobile Phone Base Stations: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  S M J Mortazavi
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2014-03-08

4.  Association between electromagnetic field exposure and abortion in pregnant women living in Tehran.

Authors:  Masoumeh Abad; Hossein Malekafzali; Masoumeh Simbar; Hassan Seyed Mosaavi; Effat Merghati Khoei
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-05

5.  A cross-sectional study of the association between mobile phone use and symptoms of ill health.

Authors:  Yong Min Cho; Hee Jin Lim; Hoon Jang; Kyunghee Kim; Jae Wook Choi; Chol Shin; Seung Ku Lee; Jong Hwa Kwon; Nam Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-26

6.  A follow-up study of the association between mobile phone use and symptoms of ill health.

Authors:  Yong Min Cho; Hee Jin Lim; Hoon Jang; Kyunghee Kim; Jae Wook Choi; Chol Shin; Seung Ku Lee; Jong Hwa Kwon; Nam Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2016-12-29

7.  Understanding and Preventing Health Concerns About Emerging Mobile Health Technologies.

Authors:  Frank T Materia; Kate Faasse; Joshua M Smyth
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Effect of electromagnetic field on abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masumeh Ghazanfarpour; Zahra Atarodi Kashani; Reza Pakzad; Fatemeh Abdi; Fatemeh Alsadat Rahnemaei; Pouran Akhavan Akbari; Nasibeh Roozbeh
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-11-03

9.  Design of an ecological momentary assessment study of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and non-specific physical symptoms.

Authors:  Rik P Bogers; John F B Bolte; Jan H Houtveen; Erik Lebret; Rob T van Strien; C Maarten A Schipper; Mehdi Alkadhimi; Christos Baliatsas; Irene van Kamp
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.