Literature DB >> 21637485

A genomic analysis of disease-resistance genes encoding nucleotide binding sites in Sorghum bicolor.

Xiao Cheng1, Haiyang Jiang, Yang Zhao, Yexiong Qian, Suwen Zhu, Beijiu Cheng.   

Abstract

A large set of candidate nucleotide-binding site (NBS)-encoding genes related to disease resistance was identified in the sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) genome. These resistance (R) genes were characterized based on their structural diversity, physical chromosomal location and phylogenetic relationships. Based on their N-terminal motifs and leucine-rich repeats (LRR), 50 non-regular NBS genes and 224 regular NBS genes were identified in 274 candidate NBS genes. The regular NBS genes were classified into ten types: CNL, CN, CNLX, CNX, CNXL, CXN, NX, N, NL and NLX. The vast majority (97%) of NBS genes occurred in gene clusters, indicating extensive gene duplication in the evolution of S. bicolor NBS genes. Analysis of the S. bicolor NBS phylogenetic tree revealed two major clades. Most NBS genes were located at the distal tip of the long arms of the ten sorghum chromosomes, a pattern significantly different from rice and Arabidopsis, the NBS genes of which have a random chromosomal distribution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sorghum bicolor; bioinformatics; disease resistance gene; nucleotide binding site

Year:  2010        PMID: 21637485      PMCID: PMC3036868          DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

Most higher plants are susceptible to infection by a variety of pathogens. A common mechanism of defense against pathogens involves a “hypersensitive response” that results in apoptosis or natural cell death of infected cells, a process in which resistance or R genes play an important role (Dhalowal and Uchimiya, 1999). Resistance genes encode proteins involved in plant resistance to a variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, oomycetes, nematodes and insects. The best characterized R genes encode products that contain a nucleotide-binding site (NBS) and a series of leucine-rich repeats (LRR) (Lupas ). The NBS sequences have been extensively used to identify and classify plant R genes based on their content of conserved motifs. The NBS-LRR genes are the most common type of R genes that have been sequenced and disease resistance is the only function that has been ascribed to them. Meyers divided the NBS-LRR genes into two sub-types based on the N-terminal structure of the encoded proteins, i.e., those with an N-terminal region homologous to the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) and those with no such homologous region (so-called non-TIR NBS-LRR or non-TNL genes). Non-TNL genes are of two types: those with a coiled-coil (CC) domain in the N-terminal region (that is shorter than in CNL genes), referred to as CC-NBS-LRR, and those with an unknown structure (X) in the N-terminus (XNL), referred to as X-NBS-LRR. According to the specific gene-for-gene hypothesis proposed by Flor (1971), interaction between the host plant and its pathogens involves avirulence genes that encode a product recognized by a specific R gene of the host plant; virulence thus represents a loss-of-function in the pathogen and a failure to trigger the defense response that in turn facilitates the occurrence of disease. If an R gene recognizes the avr gene product of the pathogen then a signal transduction cascade that leads to differential gene expression and disease resistance is activated. A proper understanding of the host plant-pathogen relationship and determination of the structure, function and mechanism of R genes are important areas of research in phytopathology and plant disease resistance (Baker ). The genome sequence of Sorghum bicolor has been reported (Paterson ). In this work, we used this database to investigate the diversity of S. bicolor R genes and assess their importance in the mechanisms of disease resistance. In the future, the cloning of R genes (The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative 2000; Venter ; Goff ; Yu ) should help to accelerate the breeding of disease-resistant S. bicolor.

Methods

The Sorghum bicolor genome

The complete genome sequence of S. bicolor was downloaded from the phytozome database.

Identification of NBS-encoding genes

By using keywords such as “NBS” and “resistance” to search 117 gene groups in GenBank we identified 143 genes with a cereal NBS motif. This NBS domain nucleotide sequence was then used as a query in BLASTN searches for possible homologs encoded in the S. bicolor genome. The threshold expectation value was set to 10-3, a value determined empirically to filter out most of the spurious hits. This step was crucial in identifying the maximum number of candidate genes. The nucleotide sequences of candidate NBS genes were used as queries to find homologs in the S. bicolor genome by BLAST searches (p value = 0.001). All of the sequences that met the requirements were analyzed by using the Pfam (Protein family) database in order to remove genes that did not contain NBS gene sequences. Each of the candidate sequences was checked manually by using available annotations in GenBank to confirm that they encoded the corresponding NBS candidate proteins. The sequences were then aligned with ClustalW using MEGA 3.1 software (Kumar ) and identical sequences located in longer sequences or genes were eliminated.

Classification of NBS genes

The NBS amino acid sequences derived from the standard NBS gene region of the Pfam database by using the hidden Markov model (HMM), starting from a pre-P-Loop structure to the end of the MHDV motif, generally contained 260-300 amino acids. (The four amino acid sequence MHDV is a key feature of most NBS-LRR proteins; Meyers ). The N-terminus precedes the pre-P-Loop structure and the LRR region follows the MHDV motif. All of the corresponding NBS candidate proteins were surveyed to determine whether they encoded TIR, CC, NBS or LRR motifs. This survey was based on the Pfam database (http://pfam.janelia.org) and used SMART (Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool) protein motif analysis (Schultz ) and COILS, a program to detect coiled coil (CC) domains (Lupas ) and used with a threshold = 0.9).

Physical location of NBS genes on sorghum chromosomes

The software DNATOOLS was used to construct local databases with the complete S. bicolor nucleotide sequence and the starting positions of all NBS genes on each chromosome were obtained using tBLASTn (p value = .001). This method was used to confirm the physical locations of all NBS genes. Finally, a chromosomal map showing the physical location of all regular NBS resistance genes was generated with Genome Pixelizer software.

Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

Multiple alignments of amino acid sequences were done with the NBS region based on the Pfam results. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using MEGA 3.1 based on the bootstrap neighbor-joining (NJ) method (bootstrap = 1000) with a Kimura 2-parameter model; these trees were subsequently used to analyze the evolutionary relationships among sorghum NBS disease-resistant genes.

Results

Identification and classification of NBS genes

Two hundred and eighty-three prospective R genes were identified in the S. bicolor genome, nine of which were subsequently found not to be NBS-encoding genes. Analysis of the remaining 274 genes with an NBS structure (based on the Pfam database) identified 224 genes with highly conserved NBS regions and a complete open reading frame (ORF). Based on sequence differences in the N-terminal and LRR regions, these 224 NBS disease-resistance genes were classified into six types: NBS, NBS-LRR, NBS-X, X-NBS, NBS-LRR-X and NBS-X-LRR (the N-terminal region of most regular NBS genes contained unknown motifs represented as X). Fifty genes had highly differentiated NBS regions with structures that varied considerably from the other 224 genes. The N-terminal regions of these genes were also short (less than 2/3 the length of the normal NBS proteins). These genes were therefore classified as non-regular NBS genes. All non-redundant candidate NBS genes were also surveyed using Pfam, SMART and COILS to determine whether they encoded TIR, CC, NBS or LRR motifs (see Materials and Methods). This information on protein motifs and domains was used to classify the NBS-encoding genes into subgroups. Finally, 143 genes containing a CC motif were identified and divided into subtypes (COILS-NBS, COILS-NBS-LRR, COILS-NBS-LRR-X, COILS-NBS-X); these genes accounted for 63.8% of all standard NBS genes (Table 1).
Table 1

The number of genes that encode domains similar to NBS genes in the Sorghum bicolor genome.

Predicted protein domainsLetter codeNumber of genes
Regular NBS genes
CC-NBS-LRRCNL36
CC-NBSCN99
CC-NBS-LRR-XCNLX2
CC-NBS-XCNX4
CC-NBS-X-LRRCNXL1
CC-X-NBSCXN1
NBS-XNX3
NBSN61
NBS- LRRNL16
NBS-LRR-XNLX1
Total regular NBS genes224
Non-regular NBS genes
NBS-40
NBS-LRR-10
Total non-regular genes50
Total NBS genes274
At least 30,434, 45,555, 27,000, 37,544 and 36,338 protein-coding genes have been identified in the fully sequenced grape (Hulbert ; Jaillon ), poplar (Tuskan ), Arabidopsis (Richly ), rice (Zhou ) and Sorghum genomes, respectively. NBS-LRR genes accounted for approximately 1.51%, 0.72%, 0.53%, 1.23% and 0.18% of all predicted ORFs in these five species, respectively. Although the absolute number of NBS-LRR genes in Sorghum was similar to rice, the relative proportion of these genes was significantly lower than in the vine grape, poplar, Arabidopsis and rice genomes (Table 1).

Chromosomal locations of Sorghum NBS genes

Standard NBS type disease-resistance genes were identified on the ten Sorghum chromosomes by using Genome Pixelizer software and classified into one of ten categories (CNL, CN, CNLX, CNX, CNXL, CXN, NX, N, NL and NLX), each represented by a different color (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Physical locations of the Sorghum bicolor NBS R genes. The boxes above and below the chromosomes (chrm; gray bars) indicate the approximate locations of the ten categories of NBS genes indicated in Table 1. Unmapped genes are shown on Chrm0.

Based on the location of individual NBS genes, 268 of the 274 Sorghum NBS-encoding genes were mapped on the ten chromosomes. The remaining genes were located on a sequence not yet linked to a chromosome (referred to as chromosome 0 in Figure 1). Of the 268 anchored NBS genes, 223 (83.2%) were located on chromosomes 3, 5, 7 and 8 (41, 45, 24 and 113 NBS-encoding genes on each respective chromosome); chromosome 1 had no NBS-encoding gene. No CC type genes were identified, while the chromosomal distribution of non-CC type genes showed an obvious pattern. As defined by Holub (2001), a gene cluster is a region in which two neighboring homologous genes are < 200 kb apart. Of the genes analyzed here, 217 were located in 20 gene clusters, each with an average of 12 genes (twice the average number of genes/cluster in rice). The largest cluster contained 36 NBS genes on chromosome 8. Most Sorghum NBS genes fell into multi-gene clusters, a distribution similar with that of rice and Arabidopsis. However, in contrast to the latter two species, most of the sorghum NBS gene clusters were located at the distal end of each chromosome (Figure 1).

Phylogenetic analysis of regular NBS genes in Sorghum

The amino acid sequences of the NBS region contained highly conserved motifs with high homology that allowed sequence alignment and the construction of phylogenetic trees to assess the relationships among the standard NBS disease-resistance genes in the sorghum genome (Figure 2). Two hundred and twenty-four standard NBS alleles were selected for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction. The other 50 non-regular NBS genes were excluded because of their short N-termini.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic analysis of the NBS genes in the Sorghum bicolor genome based on the amino acid sequences in the NBS domain. ? CN, q N, p CNL and • NL. CN indicates Coiled-coil NBS R-genes, N indicates NBS R-genes, CNL indicates Coiled-coil NBS-LRR R-genes and NL indicates NBS-LRR R-genes. The scale bar represents 20 nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.

The phylogenetic tree of the NBS domain in Arabidopsis (a dicotyledon) has two distinct clades, whereas there is no clear division of NBS regions in rice (a monocotyledon), which has a divergent, star-shaped distribution. Figure 2 shows that the phylogenetic tree of the Sorghum NBS domain also contained two major clades, which suggests that the evolutionary pattern of the Sorghum NBS domain was similar to that of Arabidopsis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed no independent clade for the NBS-LRR gene with the CC-motif, which suggested a complex pattern of evolution (Figure 2).

Discussion

By using the NBS genes of other plants as queries we were able to identify 224 Sorghum genes with highly conserved NBS regions. No TIR-encoding genes were found among these 224 genes, a finding similar to that reported for rice (only one TIR-X gene identified) (Zhou ) and maize. In contrast, the number of TIR encoding genes varies from 98 in Arabidopsis to 78 in poplar. TIR and non-TIR sequences are remarkably different among dicots and monocots, which suggest an ancient origin and subsequent divergence between the two NBS gene types; TIR-encoding genes appear to have been lost in grass genomes. The deduced NBS-LRR proteins were divided into two subfamilies, TIR-NBS-LRR (TNL) and non-TNL, based on their N-terminal features. Whereas dicotyledons such as Arabidopsis and poplar (Yang ) have many NBS resistance genes that encode proteins with N-termini containing a TIR structure, no such structures were found among the Sorghum NBS-LRR genes; this situation is similar to that of other monocotyledons such as rice and maize. It is unclear why grass genomes have a greatly reduced set of TIR-encoding genes, although gene loss or the lack of TIR gene amplification are possible explanations. Phylogenetic analysis of the NBS genes revealed differences between Sorghum and other plants. Thus, unlike rice which shows no major clades in its NBS domain (Zhou ), two major clades were identified in the Sorghum sequences. This difference may reflect different forms of duplication in the past, although the actual mechansim remains unclear. There was considerable variation in the chromosomal distribution of NBS genes in Sorghum. For example, there were no NBS genes on chromosome 1, whereas chromosome 8 contained 90 NBS genes; this situation was similar to that of rice in which 25% of the R-like genes were present on chromosome 11. This finding indicates that there are chromosomal hot spots in which the NBS genes share greater homology; these genes may have originated by tandem duplication and subsequently diverged under selective pressure. Vine grape and poplar contain 77 and 75 clusters, respectively, including 445 and 281 NBS genes with an average of 5.78 and 3.75 NBS members per cluster. In Sorghum, 97% of the NBS genes were located in gene clusters, a much higher proportion than in vine grape and poplar; there was also potentially more duplication and more multi-gene families in the Sorghum genome compared to the latter two species. The Sorghum NBS resistance genes were distributed in clusters in the distal part of the chromosomes. This peculiar location may reflect the long period of contact between Sorghum and its pathogen, with the disease-resistance genes expanding by duplication and rearrangement to eventually form distributional hot spots on the chromosomes. Phylogenetic analysis of the Sorghum NBS genes revealed clusters containing NBS genes from the same or different families. Mixed clusters could arise by chromosomal rearrangement and transposition or by genomic duplication and mutations. Unequal crossing over based on regions of homology could also expand the cluster sizes. Physical locations of the Sorghum bicolor NBS R genes. The boxes above and below the chromosomes (chrm; gray bars) indicate the approximate locations of the ten categories of NBS genes indicated in Table 1. Unmapped genes are shown on Chrm0. Phylogenetic analysis of the NBS genes in the Sorghum bicolor genome based on the amino acid sequences in the NBS domain. ? CN, q N, p CNL and • NL. CN indicates Coiled-coil NBS R-genes, N indicates NBS R-genes, CNL indicates Coiled-coil NBS-LRR R-genes and NL indicates NBS-LRR R-genes. The scale bar represents 20 nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.
  18 in total

1.  Plant disease resistance genes encode members of an ancient and diverse protein family within the nucleotide-binding superfamily.

Authors:  B C Meyers; A W Dickerman; R W Michelmore; S Sivaramakrishnan; B W Sobral; N D Young
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray).

Authors:  G A Tuskan; S Difazio; S Jansson; J Bohlmann; I Grigoriev; U Hellsten; N Putnam; S Ralph; S Rombauts; A Salamov; J Schein; L Sterck; A Aerts; R R Bhalerao; R P Bhalerao; D Blaudez; W Boerjan; A Brun; A Brunner; V Busov; M Campbell; J Carlson; M Chalot; J Chapman; G-L Chen; D Cooper; P M Coutinho; J Couturier; S Covert; Q Cronk; R Cunningham; J Davis; S Degroeve; A Déjardin; C Depamphilis; J Detter; B Dirks; I Dubchak; S Duplessis; J Ehlting; B Ellis; K Gendler; D Goodstein; M Gribskov; J Grimwood; A Groover; L Gunter; B Hamberger; B Heinze; Y Helariutta; B Henrissat; D Holligan; R Holt; W Huang; N Islam-Faridi; S Jones; M Jones-Rhoades; R Jorgensen; C Joshi; J Kangasjärvi; J Karlsson; C Kelleher; R Kirkpatrick; M Kirst; A Kohler; U Kalluri; F Larimer; J Leebens-Mack; J-C Leplé; P Locascio; Y Lou; S Lucas; F Martin; B Montanini; C Napoli; D R Nelson; C Nelson; K Nieminen; O Nilsson; V Pereda; G Peter; R Philippe; G Pilate; A Poliakov; J Razumovskaya; P Richardson; C Rinaldi; K Ritland; P Rouzé; D Ryaboy; J Schmutz; J Schrader; B Segerman; H Shin; A Siddiqui; F Sterky; A Terry; C-J Tsai; E Uberbacher; P Unneberg; J Vahala; K Wall; S Wessler; G Yang; T Yin; C Douglas; M Marra; G Sandberg; Y Van de Peer; D Rokhsar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The arms race is ancient history in Arabidopsis, the wildflower.

Authors:  E B Holub
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Mode of amplification and reorganization of resistance genes during recent Arabidopsis thaliana evolution.

Authors:  Erik Richly; Joachim Kurth; Dario Leister
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains.

Authors:  J Schultz; F Milpetz; P Bork; C P Ponting
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Signaling in plant-microbe interactions.

Authors:  B Baker; P Zambryski; B Staskawicz; S P Dinesh-Kumar
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica).

Authors:  Stephen A Goff; Darrell Ricke; Tien-Hung Lan; Gernot Presting; Ronglin Wang; Molly Dunn; Jane Glazebrook; Allen Sessions; Paul Oeller; Hemant Varma; David Hadley; Don Hutchison; Chris Martin; Fumiaki Katagiri; B Markus Lange; Todd Moughamer; Yu Xia; Paul Budworth; Jingping Zhong; Trini Miguel; Uta Paszkowski; Shiping Zhang; Michelle Colbert; Wei-lin Sun; Lili Chen; Bret Cooper; Sylvia Park; Todd Charles Wood; Long Mao; Peter Quail; Rod Wing; Ralph Dean; Yeisoo Yu; Andrey Zharkikh; Richard Shen; Sudhir Sahasrabudhe; Alun Thomas; Rob Cannings; Alexander Gutin; Dmitry Pruss; Julia Reid; Sean Tavtigian; Jeff Mitchell; Glenn Eldredge; Terri Scholl; Rose Mary Miller; Satish Bhatnagar; Nils Adey; Todd Rubano; Nadeem Tusneem; Rosann Robinson; Jane Feldhaus; Teresita Macalma; Arnold Oliphant; Steven Briggs
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Recent duplications dominate NBS-encoding gene expansion in two woody species.

Authors:  Sihai Yang; Xiaohui Zhang; Jia-Xing Yue; Dacheng Tian; Jian-Qun Chen
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses.

Authors:  Andrew H Paterson; John E Bowers; Rémy Bruggmann; Inna Dubchak; Jane Grimwood; Heidrun Gundlach; Georg Haberer; Uffe Hellsten; Therese Mitros; Alexander Poliakov; Jeremy Schmutz; Manuel Spannagl; Haibao Tang; Xiyin Wang; Thomas Wicker; Arvind K Bharti; Jarrod Chapman; F Alex Feltus; Udo Gowik; Igor V Grigoriev; Eric Lyons; Christopher A Maher; Mihaela Martis; Apurva Narechania; Robert P Otillar; Bryan W Penning; Asaf A Salamov; Yu Wang; Lifang Zhang; Nicholas C Carpita; Michael Freeling; Alan R Gingle; C Thomas Hash; Beat Keller; Patricia Klein; Stephen Kresovich; Maureen C McCann; Ray Ming; Daniel G Peterson; Doreen Ware; Peter Westhoff; Klaus F X Mayer; Joachim Messing; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genome-wide identification of NBS genes in japonica rice reveals significant expansion of divergent non-TIR NBS-LRR genes.

Authors:  T Zhou; Y Wang; J-Q Chen; H Araki; Z Jing; K Jiang; J Shen; D Tian
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.291

View more
  15 in total

1.  Loci and candidate gene identification for resistance to Phytophthora sojae via association analysis in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr].

Authors:  Lihong Li; Na Guo; Jingping Niu; Zili Wang; Xiaoxia Cui; Jutao Sun; Tuanjie Zhao; Han Xing
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 2.  Plant STAND P-loop NTPases: a current perspective of genome distribution, evolution, and function : Plant STAND P-loop NTPases: genomic organization, evolution, and molecular mechanism models contribute broadly to plant pathogen defense.

Authors:  Preeti Arya; Vishal Acharya
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.291

3.  Genome-wide identification, characterization, and evolutionary analysis of NBS-encoding resistance genes in barley.

Authors:  Yosra Habachi-Houimli; Yosra Khalfallah; Maha Mezghani-Khemakhem; Hanem Makni; Mohamed Makni; Dhia Bouktila
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Novel disease resistance gene paralogs created by CRISPR/Cas9 in soy.

Authors:  Ervin D Nagy; Julia L Stevens; Neil Yu; Chris S Hubmeier; Nona LaFaver; Megan Gillespie; Brian Gardunia; Qianshun Cheng; Steven Johnson; Audrey L Vaughn; Miguel E Vega-Sanchez; Mingqui Deng; Linda Rymarquis; Richard J Lawrence; Graeme S Garvey; Robert T Gaeta
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Genome-Wide Distribution, Organisation and Functional Characterization of Disease Resistance and Defence Response Genes across Rice Species.

Authors:  Sangeeta Singh; Suresh Chand; N K Singh; Tilak Raj Sharma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The plasticity of NBS resistance genes in sorghum is driven by multiple evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Emma Mace; Shuaishuai Tai; David Innes; Ian Godwin; Wushu Hu; Bradley Campbell; Edward Gilding; Alan Cruickshank; Peter Prentis; Jun Wang; David Jordan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Systematic analysis and comparison of nucleotide-binding site disease resistance genes in a diploid cotton Gossypium raimondii.

Authors:  Hengling Wei; Wei Li; Xiwei Sun; Shuijin Zhu; Jun Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Disease Resistance Gene Analogs (RGAs) in Plants.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Sekhwal; Pingchuan Li; Irene Lam; Xiue Wang; Sylvie Cloutier; Frank M You
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  TNL genes in peach: insights into the post-LRR domain.

Authors:  Cyril Van Ghelder; Daniel Esmenjaud
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Identification of Immune Related LRR-Containing Genes in Maize (Zea mays L.) by Genome-Wide Sequence Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Song; Baoqiang Wang; Xinghua Li; Jianfen Wei; Ling Chen; Dongmin Zhang; Wenying Zhang; Ronggai Li
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.