The cascade of molecular events involved in mammalian sex determination has been shown to involve the SRY gene, but specific downstream events have eluded researchers for decades. The current study identifies one of the first direct downstream targets of the male sex determining factor SRY as the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor TCF21. SRY was found to bind to the Tcf21 promoter and activate gene expression. Mutagenesis of SRY/SOX9 response elements in the Tcf21 promoter eliminated the actions of SRY. SRY was found to directly associate with the Tcf21 promoter SRY/SOX9 response elements in vivo during fetal rat testis development. TCF21 was found to promote an in vitro sex reversal of embryonic ovarian cells to induce precursor Sertoli cell differentiation. TCF21 and SRY had similar effects on the in vitro sex reversal gonadal cell transcriptomes. Therefore, SRY acts directly on the Tcf21 promoter to in part initiate a cascade of events associated with Sertoli cell differentiation and embryonic testis development.
The cascade of molecular events involved in mammalian sex determination has been shown to involve the SRY gene, but specific downstream events have eluded researchers for decades. The current study identifies one of the first direct downstream targets of the male sex determining factor SRY as the basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor TCF21. SRY was found to bind to the Tcf21 promoter and activate gene expression. Mutagenesis of SRY/SOX9 response elements in the Tcf21 promoter eliminated the actions of SRY. SRY was found to directly associate with the Tcf21 promoter SRY/SOX9 response elements in vivo during fetal rat testis development. TCF21 was found to promote an in vitro sex reversal of embryonic ovarian cells to induce precursor Sertoli cell differentiation. TCF21 and SRY had similar effects on the in vitro sex reversal gonadal cell transcriptomes. Therefore, SRY acts directly on the Tcf21 promoter to in part initiate a cascade of events associated with Sertoli cell differentiation and embryonic testis development.
Mammalian embryos have bipotential gonads which can develop into either a testis or
an ovary depending on paternal and maternal chromosomal contributions. Paternal
transmission of a Y chromosome triggers testicular differentiation, whereas the
contribution of paternal X chromosome results in ovarian differentiation. The
bipotential gonad contains a pool of undifferentiated somatic cell precursors that
during development differentiate into either testicular (Sertoli, Leydig, and
peritubular myoid) or ovarian (theca and granulosa) somatic cells in response to
extrinsic and intrinsic factors. The gene for the transcription factor
Sry is located on the Y chromosome and is sufficient to induce
testis fate in the bipotential gonad [1], [2], [3]. The nuclear orphan receptor
steroidogeneic factor 1 SF1 and SRY cooperatively upregulate an immediate downstream
gene Sox9 through an interaction on its testis-specific enhancer
[4].
Subsequently, SOX9 regulates the differentiation of precursor cells into the Sertoli
cells. SOX9 expressed by Sertoli cells cooperates with FGF9 and prostaglandins [5], [6] to promote
testis development. Somatic cells undergo dramatic molecular interactions during
gonadal sex differentiation to ultimately influence the differentiation of germ
cells. Several sex-specific genes have been shown to interact during the
differentiation of gonads. For example, SRY, SOX9, FGF9, and prostaglandins have an
important role in the differentiation of Sertoli cells and testis. In contrast,
RSPO1, WNT4, beta-catenin, and FOXL2 antagonize SOX9 and FGF9 to promote ovarian
differentiation [4], [7], [8]. Despite extensive efforts made to uncover the molecular
mechanisms underlying sex determination in mammals, the downstream target genes of
SRY remain poorly understood.The process of sex determination starts with differentiation of somatic cells. Since
SRY binds to HMG box sequences on the DNA, the cell fate associated genes containing
HMG box binding sites in their promoter are considered potential downstream target
candidates. Numerous cell type-restricted basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH)
transcription factors have been identified and shown to control cell fate
specification, differentiation and morphogenesis during development [9], [10], [11]. Some bHLH
genes function early in embryonic development and influence a wide variety of
tissues, while others act later in development and are required in the adult cells
to maintain cellular differentiation. In our previous microarray analysis, a bHLH
gene Tcf21 (also called, bHLHa23,
Pod1, capsulin, epicardin) was found to be highly expressed in
the gonads coinciding with the expression of SRY and SOX9 [12]. A genome wide phylogenetic
classification of the entire bHLH gene family has recently developed a uniform
nomenclature with Tcf21 named as bHLHa23 and put
it in perspective to other species [11], [13]. Tcf21 null mutants exhibit
male-to-female sex reversal with some germs cells entering meiosis [14]. An analysis of
human, mice and ratTcf21 promoters showed at least three global
SRY-binding sites within a 2 kb promoter region. Therefore we hypothesize that SRY
interacts with Tcf21 to promote somatic cell differentiation during
male gonadal sex determination. Observations demonstrate Tcf21 is a
downstream target gene for SRY action and promotes Sertoli cell development.
Results
Expression of Tcf21 gene and localization of the TCF21
protein in the rat embryonic testis
Tcf21expression has been detected quite early in development in
the embryonic mesoderm, showing a similar pattern to Wt1 and
Gata4
[15]. In a
microarray analysis with rat gonadal RNA [12], relatively higher levels
of Tcf21 transcripts were found at the embryonic day 13 (E13)
stage of testis development, after which levels are maintained during this stage
of development (Fig. 1). At
embryonic day 13, which is equivalent to the 13 to 18 tail somites stage, TCF21
was localized to somatic cells adjacent to germ cells (Fig. 2A). At E14, TCF21 immunopositive cells
were found in the Sertoli cells and at E16 in the interstitium including Leydig
cells (Fig. 2, B&D). As
a positive control, AMH was used and localized to Sertoli cells (Figure 2C). The differential
localization of TCF21 protein at different times of sex determination suggests
differential functions at different periods of testis development. Expression
patterns of TCF21 in the E13 and E14 testes indicate a transient role in Sertoli
cell differentiation, whereas expression at E16 in the interstitium suggests a
role during later Leydig cell differentiation [14], [16].
Figure 1
Embryonic gene expression in E13, E14 and E16 testis.
Relative expression of Tcf21, Sry,
Amh, Tcf12 transcript levels
obtained in microarray analysis in the testis of male rat at various
stages of embryonic gonadal development [12].
Figure 2
Immunolocalization of TCF21 protein in embryonic testis.
(A) TCF21 protein in somatic cells of the E13 testis (arrows). (B)
Localization of TCF21 protein in E14 testis. Insert shows magnified
section of E14 testis. (C) AMH localization in E14 testis. AMH was
stained with DAB, so brown color represents Sertoli cells. (D) TCF21
protein in E16 testis (green). (E) AMH localization in E16 testis.
Abbreviations: GC = Germ Cells.
SC = Sertoli Cells.
LC = Interstitial cells. Dotted circles indicate
testis cord structures. Data are representative of a minimum of three
different experiments.
Embryonic gene expression in E13, E14 and E16 testis.
Relative expression of Tcf21, Sry,
Amh, Tcf12 transcript levels
obtained in microarray analysis in the testis of male rat at various
stages of embryonic gonadal development [12].
Immunolocalization of TCF21 protein in embryonic testis.
(A) TCF21 protein in somatic cells of the E13 testis (arrows). (B)
Localization of TCF21 protein in E14 testis. Insert shows magnified
section of E14 testis. (C) AMH localization in E14 testis. AMH was
stained with DAB, so brown color represents Sertoli cells. (D) TCF21
protein in E16 testis (green). (E) AMH localization in E16 testis.
Abbreviations: GC = Germ Cells.
SC = Sertoli Cells.
LC = Interstitial cells. Dotted circles indicate
testis cord structures. Data are representative of a minimum of three
different experiments.
Characterization of the rat Tcf21 promoter
Analysis of the Tcf21 promoter revealed three putative SRY
binding sites [17] in the 2 kb upstream region from the transcription
start site. A comparison was made of the genomic region of the ratTcf21 promoter with that of mouse and human (Fig. 3A). SRY binding sites
are conserved among human, mouse and rat. There are multiple overlapping
putative SRY binding sites in mouse and rat promoters. Most of the SRY binding
sites are paired and separated by one or two nucleotides. In addition, the ratTcf21 promoter contained a binding site for SRY/SOX9 at a
−1.3 k upstream region and GATA 4 in multiple locations. Multiple E-box
binding sites are present within the −2 kb promoter regions.
Figure 3
Tcf21 promoter mutagenesis analysis.
(A) Analysis of mouse, rat and human Tcf21 promoter and
SRY binding sites. Gonadal (testis) cell culture and transfection assays
with relative luciferase activity compared to wild type (WT) promoter
presented. Bars with asterisks are significantly different from
−0.5 kb control promoter. (B) Promoter activity decreased with the
length of the promoter. (C) Deletion of SRY binding motif and relative
promoter activity. (D) Over-expression of SRY in E13 male primary cells
increase overall luciferase activity of the mutant promoter, except for
the mutant which lacks first uncoupled TAACAAA site (gray response
element). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from a minimum of
three different experiments performed in replicate. The asterisks
indicate (*) p<0.05, (**) p<0.01, (***)
p<0.001 with a Student's t-test.
Tcf21 promoter mutagenesis analysis.
(A) Analysis of mouse, rat and humanTcf21 promoter and
SRY binding sites. Gonadal (testis) cell culture and transfection assays
with relative luciferase activity compared to wild type (WT) promoter
presented. Bars with asterisks are significantly different from
−0.5 kb control promoter. (B) Promoter activity decreased with the
length of the promoter. (C) Deletion of SRY binding motif and relative
promoter activity. (D) Over-expression of SRY in E13 male primary cells
increase overall luciferase activity of the mutant promoter, except for
the mutant which lacks first uncoupled TAACAAA site (gray response
element). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM from a minimum of
three different experiments performed in replicate. The asterisks
indicate (*) p<0.05, (**) p<0.01, (***)
p<0.001 with a Student's t-test.
SRY stimulates Tcf21 promoter activity in
vitro
Primary cell cultures were derived from E13 testes, equivalent to 12–18
tail somite stage of male rat embryos, and used for promoter reporter assays.
Binding sites for SRY and SOX9 on the Tcf21 promoter were
investigated with site specific mutagenesis for their ability to regulate the
Tcf21 promoter. E13 cultures derived from testicular
primary cells or postnatal 20-day-old (P20) primary Sertoli cells were
co-transfected with an Sryexpression plasmid together with
different Tcf21 promoter fragments in a luciferase reporter
system. Similar results were obtained from both E13 testis cultures or purified
Sertoli cell cultures. The longer promoter constructs had lower luciferase
activity (Figure 3B).
Interestingly, over-expression of ratSRY (Figure 3D), mouseSRY, mouseSOX9 and humanSRY (data not shown) resulted in an increased activation of the
Tcf21 promoter (Figure 3D). Point mutations of SRY motifs
significantly perturbed promoter activity (Fig. 3C and D). Mutation of one of the three
SRY binding sites did not result in significant change in promoter activity,
while mutation of two binding sites significantly decreased the activity of the
Tcf21 promoter. Observations suggest the requirements for
having at least two SRY binding sites for activating the promoter in
vitro. Overexpression of SRY increased the activity of the
Tcf21 promoter having paired SRY binding sites (Fig. 3D).
SRY recombinant protein binds Tcf21 promoter in
vitro
The possibility that SRY binds to the defined SRY binding sites on the fragment
of the Tcf21 promoter was investigated. Reactions were set up
to bind HA tagged SRY-HA recombinant protein to the Tcf21
promoter oligonucleotides with or without mutated SRY binding sites followed by
immunoprecipitation (IP) with anti-HA antibody. Enriched fragments were analyzed
by PCR with primers flanking the binding sites (Fig. 4A). Affinity purified non-immune mouse
IgG was used as a negative control in the experiment. Anti-HA antibody pulled
down the oligonucleotide with intact SRY binding sites, but not the one with
mutated SRY binding sites (Fig.
4A).
Figure 4
SRY in vitro and in vivo binding to
Tcf21.
(A) Immunoprecipitation-based in vitro pulldown assay
was designed to test the physical binding of SRY protein with
Tcf21 promoter SRY/SOX9 response element
oligonucleotide. Recombinant SRY-HA tagged protein was bound in vitro to
250 bp Tcf21 promoter fragment containing three SRY
binding sites. An anti-HA antibody immunoprecipitated a fragment of
Tcf21 promoter containing all three SRY-binding
sites, whereas mutation of the bind site eliminated SRY binding. (B)
Antibody specificity for validating in vivo ChIP assay.
Recombinant SRY and SOX9 immunoprecipitation with anti-SRY (Santa Cruz,
CA) and anti SOX9 (Koopman) antibodies followed by western blot with
anti-HA antibody which was attached as a tag to those recombinant
proteins. The SRY antibody specifically pulled down SRY, whereas SOX9
antibody recognized both SRY and SOX9. (C and D) In
vivo carrier ChIP assay was performed using chromatin from
the embryonic testis from E13 male embryos (14–18 tail somite
stage). The anti-SRY antibody (Koopman) (C) and commercial anti-SRY
antibody (Santa Cruz, CA) (D) immunoprecipitated a fragment of
Tcf21 promoter containing SRY binding sites,
in vivo. Enriched DNA was amplified by primers
flanking SRY binding site and for non-specific enrichment PCR primers
were designed between −0.7 and −0.9 kb promoter which did
not contain any consensus binding site for HMG box proteins (no Sry
site). A control non-immune IgG (IgG) had no precipitation, while a
positive control input DNA (Input) did have Tcf21 PCR
product. A positive control GATA4 antibody (GATA4) precipitation also
pulled down a GATA4 site in Tcf21 promoter. (E)
Over-expression of TCF21 induced AMH expression in the E13 primary cells
derived from embryonic ovaries. The TCF21 or SRY over-expression (TCF21)
or (Sry) indicated, along with controls (No Primer, No DNA, Water and
Empty Plasmid), with positive PCR control of L19 gene (Positive). Data
is representative of a minimum of three different experiments.
SRY in vitro and in vivo binding to
Tcf21.
(A) Immunoprecipitation-based in vitro pulldown assay
was designed to test the physical binding of SRY protein with
Tcf21 promoter SRY/SOX9 response element
oligonucleotide. Recombinant SRY-HA tagged protein was bound in vitro to
250 bp Tcf21 promoter fragment containing three SRY
binding sites. An anti-HA antibody immunoprecipitated a fragment of
Tcf21 promoter containing all three SRY-binding
sites, whereas mutation of the bind site eliminated SRY binding. (B)
Antibody specificity for validating in vivo ChIP assay.
Recombinant SRY and SOX9 immunoprecipitation with anti-SRY (Santa Cruz,
CA) and anti SOX9 (Koopman) antibodies followed by western blot with
anti-HA antibody which was attached as a tag to those recombinant
proteins. The SRY antibody specifically pulled down SRY, whereas SOX9
antibody recognized both SRY and SOX9. (C and D) In
vivo carrier ChIP assay was performed using chromatin from
the embryonic testis from E13 male embryos (14–18 tail somite
stage). The anti-SRY antibody (Koopman) (C) and commercial anti-SRY
antibody (Santa Cruz, CA) (D) immunoprecipitated a fragment of
Tcf21 promoter containing SRY binding sites,
in vivo. Enriched DNA was amplified by primers
flanking SRY binding site and for non-specific enrichment PCR primers
were designed between −0.7 and −0.9 kb promoter which did
not contain any consensus binding site for HMG box proteins (no Sry
site). A control non-immune IgG (IgG) had no precipitation, while a
positive control input DNA (Input) did have Tcf21 PCR
product. A positive control GATA4 antibody (GATA4) precipitation also
pulled down a GATA4 site in Tcf21 promoter. (E)
Over-expression of TCF21 induced AMH expression in the E13 primary cells
derived from embryonic ovaries. The TCF21 or SRY over-expression (TCF21)
or (Sry) indicated, along with controls (No Primer, No DNA, Water and
Empty Plasmid), with positive PCR control of L19 gene (Positive). Data
is representative of a minimum of three different experiments.The specific SRY antibody developed by Dr. Peter Koopman's laboratory,
Queensland University, Brisbane, Australia was shown to bind SRY, but not SOX9
[6]. In
order to validate a commercially available anti-SRY (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz CA)
antibody for ChIP assay, in vitro immunoprecipitation was
performed using recombinant SRY and SOX9 proteins. Enrichment of target protein
was detected by western blot using antibodies against the HA tags for the
recombinant proteins. The commercial SRY antibody did pull down SRY, but did not
pull down SOX9 recombinant protein (Figure 4B). The SOX9 antibody recognized both SRY and SOX9
recombinant proteins (Figure
4B). Therefore, the SRY antibody was specific for SRY and thus used
in the ChIP assay.
SRY binds in vivo to the Tcf21 promoter during male sex
determination
There has been little progress toward identifying in vivo
downstream targets of SRY. This is in part due to technical limitations of
procedures such as in vivo ChIP assay which traditionally
requires a large amount of starting material from the embryonic testis. For
example, a conventional ChIP assay requires a large amount of chromatin which is
equivalent to pooled gonads of five to six hundred embryos [6], [18]. The techniques used in
the present study overcome these technical difficulties. The present study used
a modified in vivo ChIP assay with isolated testis samples from
20 to 25 testes at the 12 to 18 tail somite stage of rat embryo development. The
promoters of any genes that SRY directly regulates at the time of gonadal sex
determination should be pulled down from the chromatin mixture by anti-SRY
antibody. To test whether SRY associates with a fragment of
Tcf21 promoter, PCR primers were designed to amplify the
Tcf21 promoter regions flanking an SRY binding site. As a
negative control, primers were designed to a promoter region which did not
contain any HMG box sites or putative SRY binding sites. The SRY antibody
obtained from Dr. Peter Koopman, Brisbane, Australia, pulled down the fragment
of Tcf21 promoter containing the predicted SRY binding site,
but not the negative control region without its binding site (Fig. 4C). As a positive
control in the ChIP assay, anti GATA4 antibody was used. Three GATA4 response
element sites are present at different regions of the Tcf21
promoter and were used as a positive control. A ChIP assay for GATA4 was found
to immunoprecipitate and identify the in vivo Tcf21 promoter
(Fig. 4C). The anti SRY
from Dr. Peter Koopman was previously shown to be specific for mouseSRY and was
found to pull down the Tcf21 promoter from developing rat E13 gonads (Fig. 4C). A commercially
available anti SRY antibody (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA) was found to be
specific for SRY (Fig. 4B)
and also pulled down the Tcf21 promoter in the ChIP assay from developing E13
testis (Fig. 4D). Therefore,
two different anti SRY antibodies in the ChIP assay demonstrated that SRY
directly binds the Tcf21 promoter during male gonadal sex
determination. Positive controls such as TESCO which is considered a downstream
target for SRY [4], has not been characterized in the rat, so current
study did not focus on TESCO as a positive control. Instead we have initiated
genome-wide ChIP-Chip analysis of SRY targets in embryonic testis during sex
determination.
TCF21 promotes in vitro sex reversal of embryonic ovarian
cells to induce Sertoli differentiation
The above in vitro and in vivo results
demonstrate that SRY interacts with the Tcf21 promoter during
male sex determination and testis differentiation. Tcf21expression level was
similar to that of Wt1 and Gata4 at E9.5 and
E10.5 [15],
whereas during male sex determination transcripts for this gene remained
elevated in the rat. The homozygous knockout mutant for Tcf21
showed abnormal gonadogenesis, lost testis cord structures, abnormal vascular
innervations into the testis, and reduced Sox9expression in the testis [14]. These results
suggest that TCF21 is involved in male sex determination and testis
differentiation. An embryonic E13 ovary culture system was used to test whether
TCF21 can promote in vitro sex reversal and the induction of
the expression of a male marker gene of testis differentiation. Expression
plasmids for Tcf21 or Sry were over-expressed
in subcultures (less than 12) of primary cell cultures derived from E13 ratovaries. The objective was to promote an in vitro sex reversal
from an ovarian somatic cell population to a testicular somatic cell population.
TCF21 over-expression induced the expression of anti Müllerian hormone
(AMH) which is a specific marker of Sertoli cell differentiation in the
embryonic testis, but not expressed by the embryonic ovary or ovarian culture,
Figure 4E. As expected,
SRY over-expression in the embryonic ovarian cells also induced AMH expression
(Figure 4E). This
observation suggests that TCF21 promotes embryonic Sertoli cell differentiation
in a similar manner as SRY.The cell culture transcriptomes were examined to assess the in
vitro sex reversal of the embryonic ovarian cell culture to a
testis cell differentiated state on a genome wide level. Microarray analysis of
the embryonic cell cultures were investigated in the absence or presence of SRY,
TCF21 or TCF21 with its potential binding partner TCF12/REB-alpha. All bHLH
transcription factors dimerize and due to the high level of
Tcf12expression in the embryonic testis (Figure 1), the combined
actions of TCF21 and TCF12 were also assessed. TCF12 is also known as REB-alpha
which is somewhat ubiquitously expressed and a binding partner of numerous bHLH
factors [19]. Over-expression of SRY in the embryonic ovary cell
culture promoted a transcriptome more similar to the testis with approximately
800 significantly increased transcripts, Figure 5A. Interestingly, TCF21 also promoted
a transcriptome with approximately 20% overlap with that induced by Sry,
Figure 5A. The combined
actions of TCF21 and TCF12 induced a more dramatic increase in AMH expression,
data not shown, and a transcriptome with overlap with TCF21 and SRY, Figure 5. Observations support
a potential role for TCF12 as a potential partner for TCF21. A list of the genes
with the most highly increased expression induced by SRY and TCF21 are presented
in Table
S1. An extended list of the genes altered after TCF21, SRY or TCF21
and TCF12 over-expression are presented in Table S2.
Observations demonstrate TCF21 and TCF12 promote some similarities in the
in vitro sex reversal transition in the transcriptome as
SRY, supporting a role of TCF21 as a downstream target of Sry during male
gonadal sex determination.
Figure 5
Transcriptome analysis of SRY and TCF21 actions.
Venn diagram (A) with overlap of total gene sets (p<0.05) altered in
response to various expression constraints (Sry,
Tcf21, Tcf21 plus
Tcf12, Tcf12). Total genes in the
gene sets and overlap numbers are presented. These gene sets are
statistically significant increase genes, but with no further cut-off
parameters. (B) Restricted gene sets overlapped in female E13 cultures
involving gene sets with altered expression with >1.2 fold change,
p<0.05, and mean difference >10.
Transcriptome analysis of SRY and TCF21 actions.
Venn diagram (A) with overlap of total gene sets (p<0.05) altered in
response to various expression constraints (Sry,
Tcf21, Tcf21 plus
Tcf12, Tcf12). Total genes in the
gene sets and overlap numbers are presented. These gene sets are
statistically significant increase genes, but with no further cut-off
parameters. (B) Restricted gene sets overlapped in female E13 cultures
involving gene sets with altered expression with >1.2 fold change,
p<0.05, and mean difference >10.
Discussion
Since the discovery of SRY as a master male sex determining factor several efforts
have been made to identify its downstream target genes. Whether
Sox9 is the only downstream gene that carries out all functions
necessary for initiating male sex development or whether there are multiple SRY
target genes that cooperatively act to induce testis-specific somatic cell
differentiation remains to be determined. Recent developments suggest that SRY and
SF1 cooperatively activate Sox9expression through interactions
with its enhancer region, confirming Sox9 as one of the SRY target
genes [4] (Figure 6). The SRY protein has
been shown to interact in vivo with the promoter enhancer region of
the Cerebellin 4 precursor gene (Cbln4), which is present in
Sertoli cells during early embryonic development [18] (Figure 6). Although, the exact function of
Cbln4 gene in testis differentiation is not clearly understood
yet, this gene has been suggested as one of the downstream target genes of SRY.
Using a similar approach to that taken in the current study we have found SRY
directly interacts and regulates the promoter for neurotrophin 3
(Ntf3) [20], that has previously been suggested to have a critical
role in testis cord formation [21], [22] (Figure
6). A major hindrance in finding SRY target genes is the technical
limitation to in vivo chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) methods.
Using an in vivo carrier ChIP method the current study demonstrates
that SRY interacts with the bHLH family transcription factor Tcf21
during male sex determination. Observations provide insights into the mechanism of
SRY regulation of Sertoli cell differentiation and the factors regulating (e.g.
TCF21) cell differentiation during male gonadal sex determination.
Figure 6
Summary of SRY downstream genes.
Proposed downstream actions of SRY on Sox9 and
Tcf21 genes, along with Clbn4,
Ntf3, and others yet to be identified. TCF21 induction
of Sertoli cell differentiation and expression of marker genes such as
Amh indicated. Combined actions of SRY and SF1 on
Sox9 expression and actions on Fgf9
and Pgds expression indicated.
Summary of SRY downstream genes.
Proposed downstream actions of SRY on Sox9 and
Tcf21 genes, along with Clbn4,
Ntf3, and others yet to be identified. TCF21 induction
of Sertoli cell differentiation and expression of marker genes such as
Amh indicated. Combined actions of SRY and SF1 on
Sox9expression and actions on Fgf9
and Pgds expression indicated.Numerous cell type-restricted basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors
have been identified and shown to control cell fate specification, differentiation
and morphogenesis during embryonic development, while others act later in
development and are required in the adult cells to maintain cellular
differentiation. Examples include MESP in heart cell differentiation, MYOD in muscle
differentiation, and Neurogenin in neuron differentiation [23], [24], [25]. In an embryonic rat and
mouse testis microarray Tcf21 was found as one of the most highly
expressed transcription factor genes [12], Figure 1. The presence of TCF21 protein in the
somatic cells of the embryonic testis was confirmed immunohistochemically. Nuclear
localization of TCF21 was observed in the Sertoli cell in testis of the E13 and E14
testis, whereas it appeared in the interstitial cells in E16 testis suggesting it
has multiple functions during testis differentiation. Prior to male sex
determination Tcf21 mRNA is localized in the gonadal ridges and its
expression pattern was found to be similar to Wt1 and
Gata4
[15]. Gene
knockout studies suggested that Tcf21 null mutant male mice were
partially sex-reversed [14]. Combined observations suggest Tcf21 has
multiple roles in male sex determination and testis morphogenesis.Most of the genes that are highly expressed during the period of male sex
determination have SRY or SOX9 binding sites in their promoters [17]. Since the
Tcf21 promoter harbors three SRY binding sites in the −2
Kb promoter region, it was hypothesized that SRY may bind these response elements
and regulate the activity of the core promoter. Over-expression of SRY in the
primary embryonic testis cell culture increased the Tcf21 promoter
activity. This Tcf21 promoter activity was significantly reduced
when all three SRY binding sites were mutated. SRY seemed to be able to activate the
Tcf21 promoter if any two of the three binding sites were
intact. An oligonucleotide pull-down assay was used to confirm SRY directly binds to
the Tcf21 promoter SRY binding sites (Figure 4A). Although these in
vitro promoter actions and binding studies support a potential role for
SRY regulation of Tcf21, SOX9 can have similar activities and a
direct role of SRY is uncertain in vivo. An example of a gene that
has similar in vitro observations, but was found in
vivo to primarily respond to SOX9 is prostaglandin synthase (PGDS)
[6] (Figure 6). To investigate the
potential direct SRY binding to the Tcf21 promoter in
vivo a ChIP assay with chromatin samples from embryonic testis
undergoing sex determination and cellular differentiation was performed. The major
limitation in running ChIP assays with embryonic gonad samples is the amount of
chromatin required. This limitation has hindered efforts made to find downstream
target genes of SRY. The current study adopted the ChIP protocol developed by
O'Neill et al (2006) [26] and modified to meet conditions with ratSRY protein.
Observations demonstrate a ChIP with SRY antibody immunoprecipitated from embryonic
testes the Tcf21 gene promoter. Tcf21 appears to
be one of the downstream target genes of SRY. To identify other SRY target genes an
SRY ChIP is currently being subjected to ChIP-Chip whole genome promoter tiling
arrays.Tcf21 null mutants have several testis phenotypes [14] suggesting
multiple roles for TCF21 in testis organogenesis. Tcf21 was
over-expressed in primary embryonic ovarian cells derived from 15 tail somite stage
female embryos (E13) to investigate the actions of TCF21. Tcf21
over-expression induced Amh expression in the female cells and so
provided evidence of its role in the induction of testis somatic cell
differentiation (Figure 4E).
Amh is not expressed in the ovary at this time of development,
but Sertoli cells in the embryonic testis do express Amh. In
contrast, Tcf21 null mutants did not completely lack SOX9 and AMH
expression because the loss of TCF21 was likely compensated for by yet undefined
tissue specific binding partners. This phenomenon has been seen for heart muscle
differentiation in Mesp1 mutants [23], [27] and prostate differentiation
in NCoA1 mutants [28]. The over-expression of Tcf21 in the
fetal ovarian cell culture promoted an SRY-like transcriptome and cellular
differentiation similar to normal testis development. SRY and TCF21 both induced
similarities in the transcriptomes and in vitro gonadal sex
reversal in the ovarian cell culture. The group of specific genes identified will be
useful to consider in further elucidation of the cascade of gene expression in
testis differentiation. In addition to the identification of the in
vitro and in vivo association of SRY with the
Tcf21 promoter, a functional role of TCF21 in promoting
in vitro sex reversal and a SRY-like gene expression profile
was observed.A distinct function of TCF21 in testis differentiation is associated with fetal
Leydig cell differentiation. Excessive proliferation of P450SCC and SF1 expressing
cells were observed in the gonads of Tcf21 null mice [29]. TCF21expression allows fetal Leydig cells to maintain stem cell like characteristics.
These results can be explained by observations that TCF21 suppresses SF1, NOTCH1 and
hedgehog signaling which are required for differentiation of fetal Leydig cells
[16], [30]. In the rat we
observed differential immunolocalization of TCF21 during male sex determination and
testis differentiation. At the onset of sex determination when SRY is critical for
the induction of Sertoli cell fate determination, TCF21 is primarily localized to
Sertoli cells during testis cord formation (E13–E14). Later in testis
differentiation as the interstitial cells and Leydig cell differentiation is
initiated the TCF21 is primarily localized in Leydig cells (E16). Therefore, TCF21
has a transient role in the initial differentiation of Sertoli cells in response to
SRY, and then a later role in the initiation of Leydig cell differentiation. The
hypothesis is that TCF21 likely promotes a cascade of other factors, such as bHLH
proteins, to continue the subsequent differentiation.Combined in vitro and in vivo observations have
demonstrated that TCF21 is a downstream target of SRY and plays an important role in
testis differentiation (Figure
6). Our results also provide insights into the possibility for bHLH protein
involvement in Sertoli and Leydig cell differentiation. Since bHLH transcription
factors have a critical role in the differentiation of many tissues and cell types,
a role in mammalian sex determination and gonadal cell differentiation will be an
interesting future area of research. Experiments are in progress to determine the
cascade of genes following TCF21 and SRYexpression and their roles in testis
differentiation and male sex determination.
Materials and Methods
Tissue preparation and Histology
Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were kept in a temperature controlled environment and
given food and water ad libitum. Estrous cycles of female rats
were monitored by cellular morphology from vaginal smears [31]. Rats in early estrus were
paired with males overnight and mating confirmed by sperm positive smears,
denoted day 0 of pregnancy. Pregnant rats were euthanized at E13, E14, and E16
of pregnancy, and embryonic gonads were collected for histological analysis. Sex
was determined by PCR using primers specific for Sry on genomic
DNA isolated from embryo tails as previously described [32]. All procedures were
approved by the Washington State University Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC
approval # 02568-018). Tissue specimens were fixed in Bouin's solution for
1 h and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures. Serial sections of 4
µm were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using standard
procedures [33].
Immunohistochemistry
Embryonic testis sections [34] were deparaffinized, rehydrated through a graded
ethanol series, boiled 10 minutes in 10 mM sodium citrate buffer to expose the
antigens, washed with 0.1% Triton-X solution, and then blocked with
10% serum of the species secondary antibody was raised in for 30 min
prior to incubation with 0.5 µg/ml primary rabbit anti-TCF21 antibody for
18 h (ABcam). The sections were then washed with PBS and incubated with
1∶3000 diluted Alexa Fluor 488 labeled secondary antibody for 45 min (goat
anti-rabbit IgG; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR). Slides were mounted with Vecta-Shield
plus DAPI (Vector Laboratories Inc.), sealed with coverslips, and analyzed using
fluorescence confocal microscopy (Zeiss). Negative control experiments were
performed using a non-immune IgG at 0.5 µg/ml (rabbit IgG; Sigma,
St. Louis, Mo). AMH localization was performed using 5
µg/ml primary anti-MIS antibody for 18 h (R&D Systems, Minneapolis,
MN) and 1∶3000 diluted Alexa Fluor 488 labeled secondary antibody (donkey
anti-goat IgG; Invitrogen, Eugene, OR) using the protocol above. Non-fluorescent
staining was performed using DAB staining method.
Reporter Plasmid Preparation
All the primers used in plasmid preparation are listed in the Table S3.
In order to prepare Tcf21 promoter/reporter vectors, different
size fragments (−2.7 k, −1.9 k, −1.7 k, −1.6 k, and
−0.5 k) of the rat genomic DNA upstream of the coding region was amplified
(for PCR primers, see Table S3) and cloned into the pGL3-Basic
luciferase reporter vector (Promega, Madison, WI) using the SmaI and KpnI sites
of the multiple cloning region [35]. To generate mutant promoter/reporter constructs, the
SRY binding consensus sites in the promoter were mutated using complementary
oligos (Table
S3). Mutagenesis was performed using i-proof Taq polymerase (BioRad)
according to the manufacturer's directions. All constructed promoter
vectors were sequence verified. MouseSry and
Sox9expression vectors were generously gifted by Dr. Peter
Koopman (University of Queensland, Australia) to M.K.S. RatSryexpression
construct was prepared as described [20]. Briefly, a full length
ratSryexpression plasmid with a MYC tag was produced by amplifying the single
exon from rat genomic DNA and cloned into pCMV-MYCexpression vectors (Clontech,
Mountain View, CA) using the BglII and NotI restriction sites. In order to
prepare recombinant ratSRY protein, Myc-tagged ratSRY coding region was
inserted into pcDNA 3.1 vector and in vitro transcribed &
translated using a TnT T7 quick in vitro Transcription and
Translation kit (Promega).
Cell Preparation and Culture
Sertoli cell culture
All cell preparation and transfections were performed according to the
protocol developed in the laboratory as previously described [36]. All
animal procedures and protocols were approved by the Washington State
University Animal Care and Use Committee. Decapsulated testes were minced
with razor blades. Fragments were then digested with trypsin (1.5 mg/ml,
Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) to remove the interstitial cells
followed by collagenase (1 mg/ml type I, Sigma) for removal of peritubular
cells and then hyaluronidase (1 mg/ml, Sigma) for removal of germ cells.
Sertoli cells were plated under serum free conditions in 24-well Tissue
Culture Plates (Falcon Plastics, Oxnard, CA) at 1×106
cells/well. Cells were maintained in 5% CO2 atmosphere in Ham's
F-12 medium (HyClone) at 32°C [37].
E13 testis cell culture
E13 embryos (12 to 18 tail somite-stage) were collected from timed-pregnant
females as described above [34], [38]. Gonads from E13 animals were dissected and each
pair of gonads from individual animals was placed into one well of a 24 well
plate with 500 µl Ham F-12 medium until embryos could be sexed as
described above. The male gonads were then pooled and digested with trypsin
(2.5%) and collagenase (1 mg/ml type I) plus DNase (3 mg/ml) to
disassociate the cells. All the cells from the digested testes were then
cultured on 100 mm plates in Ham's F-12 with 10% bovinecalf
serum (Sigma). Cells initially multiplied well in culture and were split two
times (1∶2) as they reached confluence, at which point cell division
slowed considerably. Cells were maintained in culture, changing medium every
three days, until growth plaques were observed at approximately one month.
These growth plaques were then collected for further propagation and frozen
stocks were prepared for subsequent cell splitting such that cells could be
maintained at fewer than 12 subcultures. E13 female primary cells were also
prepared accordingly using female gonads from E13 (14 to 18 tail
somite-stage female embryos).
Transfection Procedures
Sertoli cell transfection
Sertoli cells cultured for 48 hours were transfected by the calcium phosphate
method coupled with hyper osmotic shock (10% glycerol) as previously
described [35], [36]. Briefly, 2 µg
promoter reporter plasmid with or without 1 µg expression plasmid in
150 µl transfection buffer (250 mM CaCl2 mixed 1∶1 (v∶v)
with 2× HEBES (28 mM NaCl, 50 mM HEPES, and 1.47 mM Na2HPO4 at pH
7.05)) was added to each well of a 24 well plate containing
1×106 Sertoli cells in 1 ml Ham's F-12 medium and
incubated at 32°C for 3.5 hours. Following incubation, the cells were
subjected to hyper-osmotic shock. The medium was aspirated and 1 ml of
10% glycerol in Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Invitrogen)
was added for 3 minutes. Wells were washed twice in HBSS before fresh
Ham's F-12 with 0.01% BSA was added. Following a 72 hour
incubation cells were harvested for luciferase assays. Medium was aspirated
and 100 µl of 1× cell lysis solution (Promega) was added per
well. Plates were frozen and thawed before cell lysate was collected. For
detection of luciferase reporter activity 20 µl of Sertoli cell lysate
was mixed with 100 µl of luciferase substrate (Promega) and luciferase
activity detected on a Wallac Victor II 1420 instrument.
E13 cultured testis cell transfection
Cells between sub 8 and 12 were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) [39]. Two µg
promoter reporter plasmid with or without 0.5 µg expression plasmid
was mixed with 2 µl Lipofectamine 2000 in 100 µl Opti-MEM medium
(Invitrogen) for each well of a 24 well plate. This 100 µl mix was
added to each well containing ∼90% confluent cultured E13 testis
cells in 1 ml Ham's F-12 medium without antibiotics and incubated at
32°C for 24 hours. After 24 hours medium was aspirated from cells and
replaced with 1 ml Ham's F-12 with 10% serum. Cells were
incubated 72 hours and collected for luciferase assays as described above
for Sertoli cells. For over-expression, cells were transfected in 6 well
plates with 4 µg expression construct for TCF21-pCMV-myc, ratSRY-pCMV-myc and ratTCF12-pCMV-HA. Cells were collected after 6 days and
RNA was extracted using Trizol. RNA was reverse transcribed and cDNA was
used for PCR. At least three over-expression experiments were made with both
E13 male and female cell cultures.
Immunoprecipitation Pull-Down Assay
SRY recombinant protein with HA tag was synthesized in vitro by
using Sryexpression construct and an in vitro
transcription and translation kit according to the manufacturer's
instruction (Promega) [40]. Oligonucleotides corresponding to
Tcf21 promoter with or without SRY binding site were
generated by PCR amplification with primers listed in the Table S3.
DNA-protein binding was performed in 30 ul reaction mixture containing 100 mM
KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 µM ZnSO4, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5,
4% glycerol, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mg/mL BSA, 1 µg of
poly(dIdC)/poly(dAdT), 0.5 mM DTT and protease inhibitor cocktail mini tabs
(Sigma). Binding reaction continued for an hour at room temperature. Protein-A
Sepharose beads were preswollen in the cChIP incubation buffer (50 mM Nacl, 20
mM TrisHCl pH 7.5, 20 mM Na-butyrate, and 5 mM EDTA) overnight. Before use,
beads were incubated with anti-HA antibody or with non-immune IgG as a negative
control. Following gentle centrifugation (600× g) for 5 minutes, beads
were treated with protein-oligo mixture and incubated with gentle rotation
overnight at 4 degree Celsius. In this way the antibodies, while bound to the
beads, would attach to their matching proteins and capture the oligo fragments
specifically bound to the proteins. Beads were washed three times with wash
buffer containing 50 mM, 100 mM and 150 mM NaCl. Pulled-down oligos were eluted
in a buffer containing 0.5% SDS and purified in PCR purification columns
according to manufacturer's instruction (Promega). Purified oligo DNA was
subjected to PCR with primers designed to flank that particular sequence of
Tcf21 promoter.
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay
In vivo
Carrier ChIP (cChIP) assay was adopted from O'Neill et al., (2006) [26] and
conditions were modified to meet the condition for immunoprecipitating SRY.
To run ChIP assay, male and female gonads (gonad+mesonephros) were
dissected from approximately twenty to twenty five 13 dpc (12–18 tail
somite stage) rat embryos per array and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen.
DrosophilaSL2 cells were used as a carrier.
Densely-grown cells (approximately 5×107 cells) were
pelleted and washed three times in ice-cold PBS, 5 mM sodium butyrate and
resuspended in 0.5 ml NB buffer (15 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4, 60 mM KCl, 15 mM
NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.1 mM
PMSF). Frozen testis samples were thawed, mixed with SL2 cells and
homogenized to make single cell suspension. Nuclei were pelleted,
resuspended in 20 ml NB buffer, 5% (vol/vol) sucrose, pelleted and
resuspended again in 5 ml digestion buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 0.32 M
sucrose, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mM PMSF).
Following micrococcal nuclease digestion (NEB, USA) for 10 minutes at 37
degree, the digested samples were gently spun (800×g) for 10 minutes
and supernatant set aside on ice. The pellet was resuspended in 250 ul
incubation buffer (50 mM Nacl, 20 mM TrisHCl pH 7.5, 20 mM Na-butyrate, 5
mM Na2EDTA, and 0.1 mM PMSF) and again centrifuged gently for 10 minutes.
Both the supernatants were pooled and a fraction (50 ul) out of it was kept
aside to use as input. The remaining supernatant was incubated with either
non-immune IgG or anti-SRY or anti-Gata4 antibodies at 4°C overnight.
After incubation with 100 µl of preswollen protein A-Sepharose beads
(Sigma) for 2 h at 4°C, the bead-bound immunoprecipitates were
centrifuged gently and washed five times with wash buffer (50 mM TrisHCl pH
7.5, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mM Na butyrate and 50–150 mM NaCl). The protein-DNA
complexes were incubated at room temperature with elution buffer (1%
SDS in TE) and centrifuged at 11500×g at 4°C for 10 minutes.
Elution was repeated two times and eluted DNA was pooled.
Co-immunoprecipitated DNA was purified by proteinase K digestion,
phenol/chloroform extraction, and ethanol precipitation. Final concentration
of immunoprecipitated DNA varied from 100 to 300 ng per assay. Two rounds of
PCR reactions were run for 25 cycles before evaluating samples by gel
electrophoresis. Identity of the PCR-amplified fragments was verified by
sequencing. Primers used to investigate the enrichment of
Tcf21 promoter fragments by PCR are listed in Table
S3.
Microarray Analysis
mRNA processing and hybridization were performed at Genomics Core Laboratory,
Center for Reproductive Biology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA using
standard Affymetrix reagents and protocol [41]. Briefly, mRNA was
transcribed into cDNA with random primers, from the later, cRNA was transcribed,
and from that, single-stranded sense DNA was synthesized which was fragmented
and labeled with biotin. Biotin-labeled fragmented ssDNA was then hybridized to
the Rat Gene 1.0 ST microarrays containing more than 27,000 transcripts
(Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Hybridized chips were scanned on Affymetrix
Scanner 3000. CEL files containing raw data were then pre-processed and analyzed
with Partek Genomic Suite 6.5 beta software (Partek Inc, St. Louis, MO) using
RMA, GC-content adjusted algorithm. Lists of differentially expressed genes
treatment were generated using following cut off criteria: signal ratio
Control/Treatment >1.20 or <0.83, mean difference for un-logged signals
between control and treatment >10, t-test p-values<0.05. CEL files from
this study have been deposited with the NCBI gene expression and hybridization
array data repository (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo, #GSE# GSE24666 and can be also
accessed through www.skinner.wsu.edu, and
is MIAME compliant. For genes annotation, Affymetrix annotation file
RaGene1_0stv1.na30.rn4.transcript.csv was used unless otherwise specified.
Generation of affected KEGG pathways (Kyoto Encyclopedia for Genes and Genome,
Kyoto University, Japan) used Pathway-Express, a web-based tool freely available
as part of the Onto-Tools (http://vortex.cs.wayne.edu) [42]. Previous studies have
demonstrated that microarray data are validated with quantitative PCR data [38], [43]. Due to the
presence of 11 different oligonucleotide sets for each specific gene being used
on the microarray versus only a single primer set for a gene in a quantitative
PCR, the microarray is more effective at eliminating false positive or negative
data and provides a more robust quantification of changes in gene
expression.Genes differentially expressed in F-E13 with at least 2 Treatments.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.(S2A) Differential regulation of female E13 cell culture transcriptome by ratSryexpression construct. (S2B) Differential regulation of female E13 cell
culture transcriptome by Tcf21expression construct. (S2C) Differential
regulation of female E13 cell culture transcriptome by Tcf12expression
construct. (S2D) Differential regulation of female E13 cell culture
transcriptome by Tcf21 plus Tcf12expression construct.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.List of primers used in the present study.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Yuna Kim; Akio Kobayashi; Ryohei Sekido; Leo DiNapoli; Jennifer Brennan; Marie-Christine Chaboissier; Francis Poulat; Richard R Behringer; Robin Lovell-Badge; Blanche Capel Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: J Gubbay; N Vivian; A Economou; D Jackson; P Goodfellow; R Lovell-Badge Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-09-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Andrea Ganna; Karin J H Verweij; John R B Perry; Benjamin M Neale; Brendan P Zietsch; Michel G Nivard; Robert Maier; Robbee Wedow; Alexander S Busch; Abdel Abdellaoui; Shengru Guo; J Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Paul Lichtenstein; Sebastian Lundström; Niklas Långström; Adam Auton; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Gary W Beecham; Eden R Martin; Alan R Sanders Journal: Science Date: 2019-08-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ramji K Bhandari; Ellyn N Schinke; Md M Haque; Ingrid Sadler-Riggleman; Michael K Skinner Journal: Biol Reprod Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 4.285
Authors: Maria-Paz Viveros; Adriana Mendrek; Tomáš Paus; Ana Belén López-Rodríguez; Eva Maria Marco; Rachel Yehuda; Hagit Cohen; Amy Lehrner; Edward J Wagner Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Yu-Chi Shen; Adrienne Niederriter Shami; Lindsay Moritz; Hailey Larose; Gabriel L Manske; Qianyi Ma; Xianing Zheng; Meena Sukhwani; Michael Czerwinski; Caleb Sultan; Haolin Chen; Stephen J Gurczynski; Jason R Spence; Kyle E Orwig; Michelle Tallquist; Jun Z Li; Saher Sue Hammoud Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-23 Impact factor: 14.919