Literature DB >> 21637105

Physicians' communication of Down syndrome screening test results: the influence of physician numeracy.

Britta L Anderson1, Natalie A Obrecht, Gretchen B Chapman, Deborah A Driscoll, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated three questions: (1) How do obstetrician-gynecologists communicate positive and negative test results? (2) When reporting screening test results, do obstetrician-gynecologists use quantitative or qualitative information? and (3) Is physician numeracy (i.e., the ability to use and understand numbers) associated with use of quantitative or qualitative information?
METHOD: Obstetrician-gynecologists (N = 203; 55.6% response rate) who were members of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists completed a survey about their communication of Down syndrome screening test results, an Objective Numeracy Scale, and the Subjective Numeracy Scale.
RESULTS: Higher scores on the Subjective Numeracy Scale and younger age predicted obstetrician-gynecologists' use of numbers to explain testing results. The Objective Numeracy Scale did not predict use of numbers. Gender was correlated with scores on the Subjective Numeracy Scale (r = 0.2) and the Subjective Numeracy Scale-Ability Subscale (r = 0.3), with men scoring higher than women when controlling for age. Open-ended questions revealed that communication strategies vary, with approximately one in three obstetrician-gynecologists providing numerical information, and frequency format being the commonly used numerical format.
CONCLUSION: Although physicians are often overlooked in the problem of low health literacy, it is important that we continue to investigate the impact of physician numeracy on patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21637105     DOI: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821a370f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

1.  Self-Regulation Principles Underlying Risk Perception and Decision Making within the Context of Genomic Testing.

Authors:  Linda D Cameron; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Ellen Peters; Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2017-05-05

2.  Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Nathan F Dieckmann; Christina Holt; Caitlin Gutheil; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department Among Patients With Limited Health Literacy: Beyond Slower and Louder.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Candace D McNaughton; Danielle M McCarthy; Erica Shelton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Angela Young-Brinn; Donna Fowler; Corita Grudszen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Numbers matter to informed patient choices: a randomized design across age and numeracy levels.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; P Sol Hart; Martin Tusler; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 5.  New perspectives for motivating better decisions in older adults.

Authors:  JoNell Strough; Wändi Bruine de Bruin; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-22

6.  Role of Psychosocial Factors and Health Literacy in Pregnant Women's Intention to Use a Decision Aid for Down Syndrome Screening: A Theory-Based Web Survey.

Authors:  Agathe Delanoë; Johanie Lépine; Stéphane Turcotte; Maria Esther Leiva Portocarrero; Hubert Robitaille; Anik Mc Giguère; Brenda J Wilson; Holly O Witteman; Isabelle Lévesque; Laurence Guillaumie; France Légaré
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Measuring Practicing Clinicians' Information Literacy. An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Katherine Barboza; Ashley E Jensen; Katelyn J Bennett; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.342

8.  Use of Visual Decision Aids in Physician-Patient Communication: A Pilot Investigation.

Authors:  Mary Beth Mercer; Susannah L Rose; Cassandra Talerico; Brian J Wells; Mahesh Manne; Nirav Vakharia; Stacey Jolly; Alex Milinovich; Janine Bauman; Michael W Kattan
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2017-12-14

9.  Limitations of the S-TOFHLA in measuring poor numeracy: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ashley J Housten; Lisa M Lowenstein; Diana S Hoover; Viola B Leal; Geetanjali R Kamath; Robert J Volk
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katerina Andreadis; Ethan Chan; Minha Park; Natalie C Benda; Mohit M Sharma; Michelle Demetres; Diana Delgado; Elizabeth Sigworth; Qingxia Chen; Andrew Liu; Lisa Grossman Liu; Marianne Sharko; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Jessica S Ancker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.