Literature DB >> 21635321

Tracking the continuity of language comprehension: computer mouse trajectories suggest parallel syntactic processing.

Thomas A Farmer1, Sarah A Cargill, Nicholas C Hindy, Rick Dale, Michael J Spivey.   

Abstract

Although several theories of online syntactic processing assume the parallel activation of multiple syntactic representations, evidence supporting simultaneous activation has been inconclusive. Here, the continuous and non-ballistic properties of computer mouse movements are exploited, by recording their streaming x, y coordinates to procure evidence regarding parallel versus serial processing. Participants heard structurally ambiguous sentences while viewing scenes with properties either supporting or not supporting the difficult modifier interpretation. The curvatures of the elicited trajectories revealed both an effect of visual context and graded competition between simultaneously active syntactic representations. The results are discussed in the context of 3 major groups of theories within the domain of sentence processing. 2007 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21635321     DOI: 10.1080/03640210701530797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  15 in total

1.  The action dynamics of overcoming the truth.

Authors:  Nicholas D Duran; Rick Dale; Danielle S McNamara
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha Mohamed; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Semantic support and parallel parsing in Chinese.

Authors:  Yufen Hsieh; Julie E Boland
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

Review 4.  Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Katie A Smith; Jeff Moher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Cognitive control in action: Tracking the dynamics of rule switching in 5- to 8-year-olds and adults.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Jeff Moher; Joo-Hyun Song; David M Sobel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-04-18

7.  Computer-mouse tracking reveals TMS disruptions of prefrontal function during semantic retrieval.

Authors:  Nicholas C Hindy; Roy Hamilton; Andrea S Houghtling; H Branch Coslett; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Reach tracking reveals dissociable processes underlying cognitive control.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Jeff Moher; David M Sobel; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-04-02

9.  A method for estimating the time of initiating correct categorization in mouse-tracking.

Authors:  David S March; Lowell Gaertner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04-12

10.  Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Rick Dale; Thomas A Farmer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.