Literature DB >> 21632952

The benefit of object interactions arises in the lateral occipital cortex independent of attentional modulation from the intraparietal sulcus: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Jiye G Kim1, Irving Biederman, Chi-Hung Juan.   

Abstract

Our visual experience is generally not of isolated objects, but of scenes, where multiple objects are interacting. Such interactions (e.g., a watering can positioned to pour water toward a plant) have been shown to facilitate object identification compared with when the objects are depicted as not interacting (e.g., a watering can positioned away from the plant) (Green and Hummel, 2004, 2006). What is the neural basis for this advantage? Recent fMRI studies have identified the lateral occipital cortex (LO) as a potential neural origin of this behavioral benefit, as LO showed greater responses to object pairs depicted as interacting compared with when they are not (Kim and Biederman, 2010; Roberts and Humphreys, 2010). However, it is possible that LO was modulated by an attention-sensitive region, the intraparietal sulcus (IPS), which sometimes showed a similar pattern of responses as that of LO in the Kim and Biederman (2010) investigation. To test this hypothesis, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to human subjects' LO and IPS while they detected a target object that was or was not interacting with another object to form a scene. TMS delivered to LO but not IPS abolished the facilitation in identifying interacting objects compared with noninteracting depictions observed in the absence of TMS, suggesting that it is LO and not IPS that is critical for the coding of object interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21632952      PMCID: PMC6622871          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6450-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

Review 1.  Visual attention: insights from brain imaging.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; E Wojciulik
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention.

Authors:  E Wojciulik; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation.

Authors:  S Kastner; M A Pinsk; P De Weerd; R Desimone; L G Ungerleider
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study.

Authors:  L M Stewart; V Walsh; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection.

Authors:  M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys; Sarah Edwards; Tracy Baker; Katherine Willson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Psychological defects produced by temporal lobe excision.

Authors:  B MILNER
Journal:  Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1958

8.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention.

Authors:  A Martínez; L Anllo-Vento; M I Sereno; L R Frank; R B Buxton; D J Dubowitz; E C Wong; H Hinrichs; H J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Jody Culham; G Keith Humphrey; A David Milner; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The processing of visual shape in the cerebral cortex of human and nonhuman primates: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Katrien Denys; Wim Vanduffel; Denis Fize; Koen Nelissen; Hendrik Peuskens; David Van Essen; Guy A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  6 in total

1.  Object grouping based on real-world regularities facilitates perception by reducing competitive interactions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Timo Stein; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cortical networks of dynamic scene category representation in the human brain.

Authors:  Emin Çelik; Umit Keles; İbrahim Kiremitçi; Jack L Gallant; Tolga Çukur
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 4.644

3.  Neural representations of contextual guidance in visual search of real-world scenes.

Authors:  Tim J Preston; Fei Guo; Koel Das; Barry Giesbrecht; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  High-Frequency Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation Enhances Perception of Facial Identity.

Authors:  Aleksandra Romanska; Constantin Rezlescu; Tirta Susilo; Bradley Duchaine; Michael J Banissy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Different Cortical Mechanisms for Spatial vs. Feature-Based Attentional Selection in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö; J D Crawford
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 6.  Attending to the possibilities of action.

Authors:  Glyn W Humphreys; Sanjay Kumar; Eun Young Yoon; Melanie Wulff; Katherine L Roberts; M Jane Riddoch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.