Literature DB >> 14506065

Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.

Thomas W James1, Jody Culham, G Keith Humphrey, A David Milner, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

D.F., a patient with severe visual form agnosia, has been the subject of extensive research during the past decade. The fact that she could process visual input accurately for the purposes of guiding action despite being unable to perform visual discriminations on the same visual input inspired a novel interpretation of the functions of the two main cortical visual pathways or 'streams'. Within this theoretical context, the authors proposed that D.F. had suffered severe bilateral damage to her occipitotemporal visual system (the 'ventral stream'), while retaining the use of her occipitoparietal visual system (the 'dorsal stream'). The present paper reports a direct test of this idea, which was initially derived from purely behavioural data, before the advent of modern functional neuroimaging. We used functional MRI to examine activation in her ventral and dorsal streams during object recognition and object-directed grasping tasks. We found that D.F. showed no difference in activation when presented with line drawings of common objects compared with scrambled line drawings in the lateral occipital cortex (LO) of the ventral stream, an area that responded differentially to these stimuli in healthy individuals. Moreover, high-resolution anatomical MRI showed that her lesion corresponded bilaterally with the location of LO in healthy participants. The lack of activation with line drawings in D.F. mirrors her poor performance in identifying the objects depicted in the drawings. With coloured and greyscale pictures, stimuli that she can identify more often, D.F. did show some ventral-stream activation. These activations were, however, more widely distributed than those seen in control participants and did not include LO. In contrast to the absent or abnormal activation observed during these perceptual tasks, D.F. showed robust activation in the expected dorsal stream regions during object grasping, despite considerable atrophy in some regions of the parietal lobes. In particular, an area in the anterior intraparietal sulcus was activated more for grasping an object than for just reaching to that object, for both D.F. and controls. In conclusion, we have been able to confirm directly that D.F.'s visual form agnosia is associated with extensive damage to the ventral stream, and that her spared visuomotor skills are associated with visual processing in the dorsal stream.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14506065     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awg248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  107 in total

1.  Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vision for action in the macaque medial posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Patrizia Fattori; Rossella Breveglieri; Vassilis Raos; Annalisa Bosco; Claudio Galletti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Dorsal and ventral streams across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Anna Sedda; Federica Scarpina
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Where do objects become scenes?

Authors:  Jiye G Kim; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Distinct cognitive mechanisms involved in the processing of single objects and object ensembles.

Authors:  Jonathan S Cant; Sol Z Sun; Yaoda Xu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Grasping a 2D object: terminal haptic feedback supports an absolute visuo-haptic calibration.

Authors:  Stephanie Hosang; Jillian Chan; Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Psychophysical and neuroimaging responses to moving stimuli in a patient with the Riddoch phenomenon due to bilateral visual cortex lesions.

Authors:  Michael J Arcaro; Lore Thaler; Derek J Quinlan; Simona Monaco; Sarah Khan; Kenneth F Valyear; Rainer Goebel; Gordon N Dutton; Melvyn A Goodale; Sabine Kastner; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.