BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to identify factors associated with the materials that dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) use when placing the first restoration on permanent posterior tooth surfaces. METHODS: A total of 182 DPBRN practitioner-investigators provided data regarding 5,599 posterior teeth with caries. Practitioner-investigators completed an enrollment questionnaire that included the dentist's age, sex, practice workload, practice type and number of years since graduation. When patients who had provided informed consent to participate in the investigation sought treatment for a previously unrestored carious surface, the practitioner-investigator recorded patient and tooth characteristics. RESULTS: Practitioner-investigators used amalgam more often than they used direct resin-based composite (RBC) for posterior carious lesions. Practitioner and practice characteristics (years since graduation and type of practice); patient characteristics (sex, race, age and dental insurance status); and lesion characteristics (tooth location and surface, preoperative and postoperative lesion depth) were associated with the type of restorative material used. CONCLUSIONS: Several practitioner and practice, patient and lesion characteristics were associated significantly with use of amalgam and RBC: geographical region, years since dentist's graduation, patient's dental insurance status, tooth location and surface, and preoperative and postoperative lesion depth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Despite advances in esthetic dentistry, U.S. dentists still are placing amalgam on posterior teeth with carious lesions. Amalgam was used more often than RBC in older patients, who may have had deeper carious lesions.
BACKGROUND: The authors conducted a study to identify factors associated with the materials that dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) use when placing the first restoration on permanent posterior tooth surfaces. METHODS: A total of 182 DPBRN practitioner-investigators provided data regarding 5,599 posterior teeth with caries. Practitioner-investigators completed an enrollment questionnaire that included the dentist's age, sex, practice workload, practice type and number of years since graduation. When patients who had provided informed consent to participate in the investigation sought treatment for a previously unrestored carious surface, the practitioner-investigator recorded patient and tooth characteristics. RESULTS: Practitioner-investigators used amalgam more often than they used direct resin-based composite (RBC) for posterior carious lesions. Practitioner and practice characteristics (years since graduation and type of practice); patient characteristics (sex, race, age and dental insurance status); and lesion characteristics (tooth location and surface, preoperative and postoperative lesion depth) were associated with the type of restorative material used. CONCLUSIONS: Several practitioner and practice, patient and lesion characteristics were associated significantly with use of amalgam and RBC: geographical region, years since dentist's graduation, patient's dental insurance status, tooth location and surface, and preoperative and postoperative lesion depth. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Despite advances in esthetic dentistry, U.S. dentists still are placing amalgam on posterior teeth with carious lesions. Amalgam was used more often than RBC in older patients, who may have had deeper carious lesions.
Authors: B L Chadwick; P M Dummer; F D Dunstan; A S Gilmour; R J Jones; C J Phillips; J Rees; S Richmond; J Stevens; E T Treasure Journal: Qual Health Care Date: 1999-09
Authors: Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Ulrika Funegård; Anders Lindberg; Mats Nilsson Journal: J Dent Date: 2009-05-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Marcelle M Nascimento; Valeria V Gordan; Vibeke Qvist; Mark S Litaker; D Brad Rindal; O D Williams; Jeffrey L Fellows; Lloyd K Ritchie; Ivar A Mjör; Jocelyn McClelland; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Gene E Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Tanzy M T Love; Emeir M McSorley; Maxine P Bonham; Maria S Mulhern; Alison J Yeates; Philip W Davidson; Conrad F Shamlaye; J J Strain; Sally W Thurston; Donald Harrington; Grazyna Zareba; Julie M W Wallace; Gary J Myers Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2013-07-13 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Gene E Watson; Katie Evans; Sally W Thurston; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Julie M W Wallace; Emeir M McSorley; Maxine P Bonham; Maria S Mulhern; Alison J McAfee; Philip W Davidson; Conrad F Shamlaye; J J Strain; Tanzy Love; Grazyna Zareba; Gary J Myers Journal: Neurotoxicology Date: 2012-10-12 Impact factor: 4.294
Authors: Sonia K Makhija; Gregg H Gilbert; Ellen Funkhouser; James D Bader; Valeria V Gordan; D Brad Rindal; Michael Bauer; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Vibeke Qvist Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Michael S McCracken; Valeria V Gordan; Mark S Litaker; Ellen Funkhouser; Jeffrey L Fellows; Douglass G Shamp; Vibeke Qvist; Jeffrey S Meral; Gregg H Gilbert Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: María Eugenia Cabaña-Muñoz; José María Parmigiani-Izquierdo; Luis Alberto Bravo-González; Hee-Moon Kyung; José Joaquín Merino Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 3.240