Literature DB >> 21626959

On the use of the MLC dosimetric leaf gap as a quality control tool for accurate dynamic IMRT delivery.

Xiangyang Mei1, Ian Nygren, J Eduardo Villarreal-Barajas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MLC leaf gap consistency is critical for the accurate delivery of dynamic IMRT plans. It is estimated that a systematic MLC leaf gap change of 0.6 mm will result in a 2% change to the equivalent uniform dose to a clinical target volume for a typical head and neck sliding window (SW) IMRT plan. The aim of this work is to use the measured dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) to verify the dosimetric reproducibility of dynamically delivered SW IMRT plans. This study focuses on Varian linacs equipped with the 120 Millennium MLC and the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS), but can be extended to other linac/MLC/TPS combination.
METHODS: An ionization chamber, a diode array, and an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) were used to assess the DLG in zero (central axis), one, and two dimensions, respectively. The DLG for zero and two dimensions was derived from measurements of SW fields of decreasing width (2, 1.5, 1, and 0.5 cm). The DLG in one dimension was measured directly from a single SW sweeping across a linear diode array. This one-dimensional DLG measurement was based on the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the dose rate versus time spectrum.
RESULTS: The DLG derived from ion chamber measurements at central axis agrees to within 0.1 mm, with the DLG measured directly from the FWHM of dose rate versus time spectrum. The measured DLG depends on the control points used for the MLC SW fields. When two control points were used, the DLG measured at central axis showed an increase of 0.6 mm with respect to the same measurements performed using three or more control points. The two-dimensional distribution of DLG obtained using the EPID identified leaf gap errors as small as +/- 0.2 mm in isolated areas away from central axis.
CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive measurements of the DLG in 0D, 1D, and 2D provide an accurate assessment of DLG value required during TPS commissioning. These DLG measurements can also be used as a quality control tool to quantify changes of the MLC calibration and leaf gap consistency, which is critical for the accurate delivery of dynamically delivered SW IMRT plans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626959     DOI: 10.1118/1.3567148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Validation of Dosimetric Leaf Gap (DLG) prior to its implementation in Treatment Planning System (TPS): TrueBeam™ millennium 120 leaf MLC.

Authors:  Ravindra Shende; Ganesh Patel
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-10-21

2.  On using the dosimetric leaf gap to model the rounded leaf ends in VMAT/RapidArc plans.

Authors:  Stanislaw Szpala; Fred Cao; Kirpal Kohli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Nithiyanantham; Ganesh K Mani; Vikraman Subramani; Lutz Mueller; Karrthick K Palaniappan; Tejinder Kataria
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jinkoo Kim; James S Han; An Ting Hsia; Shidong Li; Zhigang Xu; Samuel Ryu
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-02-20

5.  Unlocking a closed system: dosimetric commissioning of a ring gantry linear accelerator in a multivendor environment.

Authors:  Amarjit Saini; Chris Tichacek; William Johansson; Gage Redler; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo G Moros; Muqeem Qayyum; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A strategy to determine off-axis dosimetric leaf gap using OSLD and EPID.

Authors:  Janahiraman Divyalakshmi; K Mohamathu Rafic; Ebenezer Suman Babu; Timothy Peace Balasingh; Amalan Sebastin; Christopher J Sujith; L Jose Solomon Raj
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-12-30

7.  Determination of dosimetric leaf gap using amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device and its influence on intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery.

Authors:  S Timothy Peace Balasingh; I Rabi Raja Singh; K Mohamathu Rafic; S Ebenezer Suman Babu; B Paul Ravindran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

8.  An EPID-based system for gantry-resolved MLC quality assurance for VMAT.

Authors:  Benjamin J Zwan; Michael P Barnes; Todsaporn Fuangord; Cameron J Stanton; Daryl J O'Connor; Paul J Keall; Peter B Greer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Determining the optimal dosimetric leaf gap setting for rounded leaf-end multileaf collimator systems by simple test fields.

Authors:  Weiguang Yao; Jonathan B Farr
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  MLC parameters from static fields to VMAT plans: an evaluation in a RT-dedicated MC environment (PRIMO).

Authors:  Lucia Paganini; Giacomo Reggiori; Antonella Stravato; Valentina Palumbo; Pietro Mancosu; Francesca Lobefalo; Anna Gaudino; Antonella Fogliata; Marta Scorsetti; Stefano Tomatis
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.