Literature DB >> 21626086

Forensic validation of the PowerPlex® ESI 16 STR Multiplex and comparison of performance with AmpFlSTR® SGM Plus®.

Valerie C Tucker1, Amanda J Kirkham, Andrew J Hopwood.   

Abstract

We describe the forensic validation of Promega's PowerPlex® European Standard Investigator 16 (ESI 16) multiplex kit and compare results generated with the AmpFlSTR® SGM Plus® (SGM+) multiplex. ESI 16 combines the loci contained within the SGM+ multiplex with five additional loci: D2S441, D10S1248, D22S1045, D1S1656, and D12S391. A relative reduction in amplicon size of the SGM+ loci facilitates an increased robustness and amplification success of these amplicons with degraded DNA samples. Tests performed herein supplement ESI 16 data published previously with sensitivity, profile quality, mock casework, inhibitor and mixture study data collected in our laboratories in alignment with our internal technical and quality guidelines and those issued by the Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM), the DNA Advisory Board (DAB) and the DNA working group (DNAWG) of the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI). Full profiles were routinely generated from a fully heterozygous single source DNA template using 62.5 pg for ESI 16 and 500 pg for SGM+. This increase in sensitivity has a consequent effect on mixture analyses and the detection of minor mixture components. The improved PCR chemistry confers enhanced tolerance to high levels of laboratory prepared inhibitors compared with SGM+ results. In summary, our results demonstrate that the ESI 16 multiplex kit is more robust and sensitive compared with SGM+ and will be a suitable replacement system for the analysis of forensic DNA samples providing compliance with the European standard set of STR loci.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626086     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-011-0582-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  13 in total

1.  An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA.

Authors:  P Gill; J Whitaker; C Flaxman; N Brown; J Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2000-07-24       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.

Authors:  Cydne L Holt; Martin Buoncristiani; Jeanette M Wallin; Theresa Nguyen; Katherine D Lazaruk; P S Walsh
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Evaluation and validation of the ABI 3700, ABI 3100, and the MegaBACE 1000 capillary array electrophoresis instruments for use with short tandem repeat microsatellite typing in a forensic environment.

Authors:  Pieris Koumi; Helen E Green; Susan Hartley; Darren Jordan; Sharon Lahec; Richard J Livett; Kam W Tsang; David M Ward
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  The evolution of DNA databases--recommendations for new European STR loci.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Lyn Fereday; Niels Morling; Peter M Schneider
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  New multiplexes for Europe-amendments and clarification of strategic development.

Authors:  Peter Gill; Lyn Fereday; Niels Morling; Peter M Schneider
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Developmental validation of reduced-size STR Miniplex primer sets.

Authors:  Kerry L Opel; Denise T Chung; Jirí Drábek; John M Butler; Bruce R McCord
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.832

7.  Short tandem repeat typing of bodies from a mass disaster: high success rate and characteristic amplification patterns in highly degraded samples.

Authors:  J P Whitaker; T M Clayton; A J Urquhart; E S Millican; T J Downes; C P Kimpton; P Gill
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.993

8.  Magnitude-dependent variation in peak height balance at heterozygous STR loci.

Authors:  Jason R Gilder; Keith Inman; William Shields; Dan E Krane
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas.

Authors:  P Gill; R Sparkes; R Pinchin; T Clayton; J Whitaker; J Buckleton
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1998-01-09       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  A new method of STR interpretation using inferential logic--development of a criminal intelligence database.

Authors:  P Gill; A Urquhart; E Millican; N Oldroyd; S Watson; R Sparkes; C P Kimpton
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.686

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  New Perspectives for Whole Genome Amplification in Forensic STR Analysis.

Authors:  Richard Jäger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 6.208

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.