Literature DB >> 12064672

TWGDAM validation of AmpFlSTR PCR amplification kits for forensic DNA casework.

Cydne L Holt1, Martin Buoncristiani, Jeanette M Wallin, Theresa Nguyen, Katherine D Lazaruk, P S Walsh.   

Abstract

Laboratory procedures used in short tandem repeat (STR) analysis were subjected to various scenarios that assessed reliability and identified potential limitations. These validation studies were designed as recommended by the Technical Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (TWGDAM) and the DNA Advisory Board (DAB) (17,18). Various DNA samples were amplified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using AmpFlSTR PCR Amplification Kits (i.e., AmpFlSTR Green I, Profiler, Profiler Plus, and COfiler kits), detected with ABI Prism instrumentation, and analyzed using GeneScan and Genotyper software. Data acquired in these studies reinforced an existing body of knowledge and expertise regarding application and interpretation of STR typing in the forensic science community. Consistent STR genotypes were detected in various body tissues and fluids. Inter-laboratory comparisons produced concordant genotype results. Quantitative interpretational aids for DNA mixtures were characterized. Ability of the typing systems to type potentially compromised samples reliably was evaluated. Nonprobative case evidentiary DNA was successfully amplified, genotyped, and interpreted. Potential limitations or cautionary factors in the interpretation of minimal fluorescence intensity were demonstrated. Differential amplification between loci was observed when PCR was inhibited; preferential amplification typically was not. Single AmpFlSTR locus amplification did not offer consistent benefit over AmpFlSTR multiplexing, even in cases of DNA degradation or PCR inhibition. During rigorous evaluation, AmpFlSTR PCR Amplification Kits reproducibly yielded sensitive and locus-specific results, as required in routine forensic analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12064672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Forensic Sci        ISSN: 0022-1198            Impact factor:   1.832


  7 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of interference due to stutter in estimating chimerism following hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bharat Thyagarajan; Shawn Young; Stacy Floodman; Randolph Peterson; Xinjing Wang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Forensic validation of the PowerPlex® ESI 16 STR Multiplex and comparison of performance with AmpFlSTR® SGM Plus®.

Authors:  Valerie C Tucker; Amanda J Kirkham; Andrew J Hopwood
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Magnitude-dependent variation in peak height balance at heterozygous STR loci.

Authors:  Jason R Gilder; Keith Inman; William Shields; Dan E Krane
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Validity of low copy number typing and applications to forensic science.

Authors:  Bruce Budowle; Arthur J Eisenberg; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method.

Authors:  Kelly S Grisedale; Angela van Daal
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2012-07-02

6.  Forensic trace DNA: a review.

Authors:  Roland Ah van Oorschot; Kaye N Ballantyne; R John Mitchell
Journal:  Investig Genet       Date:  2010-12-01

7.  Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion.

Authors:  Frederick R Bieber; John S Buckleton; Bruce Budowle; John M Butler; Michael D Coble
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.797

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.