Literature DB >> 14663838

Living with achondroplasia: attitudes toward population screening and correlation with quality of life.

Sarah E Gollust1, Richard E Thompson, Holly C Gooding, Barbara B Biesecker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Since the discovery of the gene that causes achondroplasia, population-wide prenatal screening for this condition has become a possibility. This study sought to assess attitudes toward screening for achondroplasia and correlation with quality of life in a population of individuals affected with achondroplasia and first-degree relatives.
METHODS: Surveys were collected from 189 individuals affected with achondroplasia and 136 average-statured first-degree relatives.
RESULTS: While 87% of all respondents would support the use of prenatal screening by affected parents at risk of having a fetus with the homozygous, lethal form of achondroplasia, 29% would support general population prenatal screening for achondroplasia. Attitudes supporting general population screening were more likely to be held by those people with less education, who were affected with achondroplasia, who supported abortion, and who believed that achondroplasia is a serious condition without any accompanying advantages (p<0.01). Those respondents who felt positively toward offering the prenatal test for individuals at risk for homozygous achondroplasia were more likely to have lower mean quality of life scores and to support abortion in general (p<0.05).
CONCLUSION: These data suggest that opinions about prenatal screening are heterogeneous within this study population and are related to individuals' experiences and perceptions of the condition. Future research is needed to assess attitudes toward population screening and quality of life in communities of individuals affected with genetic conditions, both to support policy decisions and to inform the education and counseling provided in the prenatal setting. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663838     DOI: 10.1002/pd.743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  12 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life in rare genetic conditions: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Julie S Cohen; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  High Levels of Interest in Reproductive Genetic Information in Parents of Children and Adults With Hirschsprung Disease.

Authors:  Courtney D Berrios; Aravinda Chakravarti; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Human genome editing and the identity politics of genetic disability.

Authors:  Felicity Boardman
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-09-06

5.  Factors associated with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in adults with short stature skeletal dysplasias.

Authors:  Nitasha Dhiman; Alia Albaghdadi; Cheryl K Zogg; Meesha Sharma; Julie E Hoover-Fong; Michael C Ain; Adil H Haider
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Decisions about testing and termination of pregnancy for different fetal conditions: a qualitative study of European White and Pakistani mothers of affected children.

Authors:  Shenaz Ahmed; Jenny Hewison; Josephine M Green; Howard S Cuckle; Janet Hirst; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Imagined futures: how experiential knowledge of disability affects parents' decision making about fetal abnormality.

Authors:  Emma F France; Louise Locock; Kate Hunt; Sue Ziebland; Kate Field; Sally Wyke
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-30       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  Impact of three genetic musculoskeletal diseases: a comparative synthesis of achondroplasia, Duchenne muscular dystrophy and osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Maman Joyce Dogba; Frank Rauch; Erin Douglas; Christophe Bedos
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  How do genetically disabled adults view selective reproduction? Impairment, identity, and genetic screening.

Authors:  Felicity K Boardman; Rachel Hale
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions toward gene editing technology.

Authors:  Lily Hoffman-Andrews; Ronit Mazzoni; Michelle Pacione; Rosemarie Garland-Thomson; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 2.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.