Literature DB >> 21622495

Young adults' interpretations of tobacco brands: implications for tobacco control.

Philip Gendall1, Janet Hoek, George Thomson, Richard Edwards, Gina Pene, Heather Gifford, Gill Pirikahu, Judith McCool.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Marketers have long recognized the power and importance of branding, which creates aspirational attributes that increase products' attractiveness. Although brand imagery has traditionally been communicated via mass media, packaging's importance in promoting desirable brand-attribute associations has increased. Knowledge of how groups prone to smoking experimentation interpret tobacco branding would inform the debate over plain packaging currently occurring in many countries.
METHODS: We conducted 12 group discussions and four in-depth interviews with 66 young adult smokers and nonsmokers of varying ethnicities from two larger New Zealand cities and one provincial city. Participants evaluated 10 familiar and unfamiliar tobacco brands using brand personality attributes and discussed the associations they had made.
RESULTS: Participants ascribed very different images to different brands when exposed to the packaging alone, regardless of whether they had seen or heard of the brands before. Perceptual mapping of brands and image attributes highlighted how brand positions varied from older, more traditional, and male oriented to younger, feminine, and "cool."
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasize the continuing importance of tobacco branding as a promotion tool, even when communicated only by packaging. The ease with which packaging alone enabled young people to identify brand attributes and the desirable associations these connoted illustrate how tobacco packaging functions as advertising. The results support measures such as plain packaging of tobacco products to reduce exposure to these overt behavioral cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622495     DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  20 in total

1.  Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the U.S.A.

Authors:  Cati G Brown-Johnson; Lucinda J England; Stanton A Glantz; Pamela M Ling
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  ST product characteristics and relationships with perceptions and behaviors among rural adolescent males: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth T Couch; Ellen F Darius; Margaret M Walsh; Benjamin W Chaffee
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2017-12-01

3.  Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.

Authors:  Seema Mutti; David Hammond; Jessica L Reid; Christine M White; James F Thrasher
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 4.  Tobacco packaging design for reducing tobacco use.

Authors:  Ann McNeill; Shannon Gravely; Sara C Hitchman; Linda Bauld; David Hammond; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers' responses to novel tobacco warnings.

Authors:  Janet Hoek; Anna Hoek-Sims; Philip Gendall
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' ratings of plain and branded cigarette packaging: an experimental study.

Authors:  Ashleigh Guillaumier; Billie Bonevski; Chris Paul; Sarah Durkin; Catherine D'Este
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Young smokers and non-smokers perceptions of typical users of plain vs. branded cigarette packs: a between-subjects experimental survey.

Authors:  Ingeborg Lund; Janne Scheffels
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.

Authors:  Christine M White; David Hammond; James F Thrasher; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Flemish adolescents' perceptions of cigarette plain packaging: a qualitative study with focus group discussions.

Authors:  Guido Van Hal; Sofie Van Roosbroeck; Bart Vriesacker; Matheus Arts; Sarah Hoeck; Jessica Fraeyman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A cross-sectional analysis of how young adults perceive tobacco brands: implications for FCTC signatories.

Authors:  Philip Gendall; Janet Hoek; Richard Edwards; Judith McCool
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.