Literature DB >> 21621891

Medial frontal event-related potentials and reward prediction: do responses matter?

Laura E Martin1, Geoffrey F Potts.   

Abstract

Medial frontal event-related potentials (ERPs) following rewarding feedback index outcome evaluation. The majority of studies examining the feedback related medial frontal negativity (MFN) employ active tasks during which participants' responses impact their feedback, however, the MFN has been elicited during passive tasks. Many of the studies examining the MFN show enhanced effects when an error in reward prediction occurs (i.e. expected rewards are not delivered). To clarify the roles of reward prediction error and active responding in producing the MFN, the current study employed a reward prediction design with active and passive task blocks. Following the presentation of a reward predictor, participants (active task) or the computer (passive task) indicated whether participants would receive the outcome associated with a stimulus presented on the left or right of the reward predictor. The MFN was largest when the trial outcome was worse than predicted and this effect was enhanced when the participant, rather than the computer, made the choice. These results show that both reward prediction error and active choice impact the neural system of outcome monitoring with the largest MFN when the individual's decision led to the negative outcome.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621891      PMCID: PMC3159831          DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  22 in total

1.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Clay B Holroyd; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Parsing decision making processes in prefrontal cortex: response inhibition, overcoming learned avoidance, and reversal learning.

Authors:  Steven G Greening; Elizabeth C Finger; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural response to action and reward prediction errors: Comparing the error-related negativity to behavioral errors and the feedback-related negativity to reward prediction violations.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Laura E Martin; Siri-Maria Kamp; Emanuel Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Knowing good from bad: differential activation of human cortical areas by positive and negative outcomes.

Authors:  Sander Nieuwenhuis; Heleen A Slagter; Niels J Alting von Geusau; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Medial frontal cortex activity and loss-related responses to errors.

Authors:  Stephan F Taylor; Brian Martis; Kate D Fitzgerald; Robert C Welsh; James L Abelson; Israel Liberzon; Joseph A Himle; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Brain responses to outcomes of one's own and other's performance in a gambling task.

Authors:  Rongjun Yu; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Michael G H Coles
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Reward sensitivity in impulsivity.

Authors:  Laura E Martin; Geoffrey F Potts
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-06-28       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Learning from experience: event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice.

Authors:  Matthew M Walsh; John R Anderson
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  The importance of agency in human reward processing.

Authors:  Cameron D Hassall; Greg Hajcak; Olave E Krigolson
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Patrick Mussel; Linda Ohrlein; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Binary sensitivity of theta activity for gain and loss when monitoring parametric prediction errors.

Authors:  Denise J C Janssen; Edita Poljac; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Dimitrios J Palidis; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural reward and punishment sensitivity in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Potts; Erika L Bloom; David E Evans; David J Drobes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Neuroimaging studies of factors related to exercise: rationale and design of a 9 month trial.

Authors:  Stephen D Herrmann; Laura E Martin; Florence J Breslin; Jeffery J Honas; Erik A Willis; Rebecca J Lepping; Cheryl A Gibson; Christie A Befort; Kate Lambourne; Jeffrey M Burns; Bryan K Smith; Debra K Sullivan; Richard A Washburn; Hung-Wen Yeh; Joseph E Donnelly; Cary R Savage
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.226

9.  Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.

Authors:  Roman Osinsky; Jennifer Seeger; Patrick Mussel; Johannes Hewig
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Individual differences in reward prediction error: contrasting relations between feedback-related negativity and trait measures of reward sensitivity, impulsivity and extraversion.

Authors:  Andrew J Cooper; Eilish Duke; Alan D Pickering; Luke D Smillie
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.