Literature DB >> 21621424

Cardiac allograft hypertrophy is associated with impaired exercise tolerance after heart transplantation.

Eugenia Raichlin1, Malik A Al-Omari, Courtney L Hayes, Brooks S Edwards, Robert P Frantz, Barry A Boilson, Alfredo L Clavell, Richard J Rodeheffer, John A Schirger, Sudhir S Kushwaha, Thomas G Allison, Naveen L Pereira.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise performance, an important aspect of quality of life, remains limited after heart transplantation (HTx). This study examines the effect of cardiac allograft remodeling on functional capacity after HTx.
METHODS: The total cohort of 117 HTx recipients, based on echocardiographic determination of left ventricle mass and relative wall thickness at 1 year after HTx, was divided into 3 groups: (1) NG, normal geometry; (2) CR, concentric remodeling; and (3) CH, concentric hypertrophy. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing was performed 5.03 ± 3.08 years after HTx in all patients. Patients with acute rejection or significant graft vasculopathy were excluded.
RESULTS: At 1 year post-HTx, 30% of patients had CH, 55% had CR and 15% had NG. Exercise tolerance, measured by maximum achieved metabolic equivalents (4.62 ± 1.44 vs 5.52 ± 0.96 kcal/kg/h), normalized peak Vo(2) (52 ± 14% vs 63 ± 12%) and Ve/Vco(2) (41 ± 17 vs 34 ± 6), was impaired in the CH group compared with the NG group. A peak Vo(2) ≤14 ml/kg/min was found in 6%, 22% and 48% of patients in the NG, CR and CH groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The CH pattern was associated with a 7.4-fold increase in relative risk for a peak Vo(2) ≤14 ml/kg/min compared with NG patients (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 51.9, p = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, a 1-year CH pattern was independently associated with a reduced normalized peak Vo(2) (p = 0.018) and an elevated Ve/Vco(2) (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of CH at 1 year after HTx is independently associated with decreased normalized peak Vo(2) and increased ventilatory response in stable heart transplant recipients. The identification of CH, a potentially reversible mechanism of impairment in exercise capacity after HTx, may have major clinical implications.
Copyright © 2011 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621424      PMCID: PMC3501386          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  53 in total

1.  Mechanisms of exercise intolerance: insights from tissue Doppler imaging.

Authors:  Stanislaw J Skaluba; Sheldon E Litwin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-02-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings.

Authors:  R B Devereux; D R Alonso; E M Lutas; G J Gottlieb; E Campo; I Sachs; N Reichek
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Hemodynamic profiles at rest and during supine exercise after orthotopic cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  P W Pflugfelder; F N McKenzie; W J Kostuk
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  D Levy; R J Garrison; D D Savage; W B Kannel; W P Castelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Regression of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy by losartan compared with atenolol: the Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) trial.

Authors:  Richard B Devereux; Björn Dahlöf; Eva Gerdts; Kurt Boman; Markku S Nieminen; Vasilios Papademetriou; Jens Rokkedal; Katherine E Harris; Jonathan M Edelman; Kristian Wachtell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-23       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Relationship between exercise systolic blood pressure and left ventricular geometry in overweight, mildly hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Lee M Pierson; Simon L Bacon; Andrew Sherwood; Alan L Hinderliter; Michael Babyak; Elizabeth C D Gullette; Robert Waugh; James A Blumenthal
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Exercise capacity for survivors of cardiac transplantation or sustained medical therapy for stable heart failure.

Authors:  L W Stevenson; K Sietsema; J H Tillisch; V Lem; J Walden; J A Kobashigawa; J Moriguchi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncomplicated essential hypertension.

Authors:  M J Koren; R B Devereux; P N Casale; D D Savage; J H Laragh
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Coronary vascular reserve in left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to chronic aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  A D Pichard; H Smith; J Holt; J Meller; R Gorlin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Cardiorespiratory responses of cardiac transplant patients to graded, symptom-limited exercise.

Authors:  W M Savin; W L Haskell; J S Schroeder; E B Stinson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  LVAD implant as a bridge to heart transplantation is associated with allosensitization as measured by single antigen bead assay.

Authors:  Nisha Shankar; Richard Daly; Jennifer Geske; Sudhir K Kushwaha; Michael Timmons; Lyle Joyce; John Stulak; Manish Gandhi; Walter Kremers; Soon Park; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Changes in cardiopulmonary exercise testing parameters following continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation and heart transplantation.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Thomas G Allison; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.712

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.