Literature DB >> 6218741

Coronary vascular reserve in left ventricular hypertrophy secondary to chronic aortic regurgitation.

A D Pichard, H Smith, J Holt, J Meller, R Gorlin.   

Abstract

Coronary vascular reserve was studied in 11 patients with severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR). Nineteen patients with the chest pain syndrome and normal findings on cardiac catheterization served as control subjects. Resting coronary sinus flow and contrast-agent-induced hyperemia were measured by continuous thermodilution. Left ventricular (LV) dimensions and mass were obtained echocardiographically. All patients had normal coronary arteries. Resting coronary flow was increased and coronary reserve was decreased in patients with AR compared with the control subjects: 310 +/- 38 versus 121 +/- 13 ml/min and 56 +/- 9 versus 86 +/- 7.5%, respectively. The decrease in coronary vascular reserve correlated with the increase in LV mass (r = -0.86, p = 0.001) and LV wall thickness (r = -0.83, p = 0.002) and with the decrease in LV volume/mass ratio (r = 0.761, p = 0.007). There was no significant correlation between the decrease in coronary vascular reserve and LV volume (r = 0.255), LV peak wall stress (r = 0.292), LV systolic pressure (r = -0.495), aortic or LV diastolic pressure (r = 0.322 and -0.318, respectively), or aortic-LV diastolic gradient, nor with the voltage on the electrocardiogram (limb leads r = -0.60, precordial leads r = -0.118). Thus, coronary vascular reserve is decreased in proportion to the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with chronic AR. Patients with angina pectoris tended to have a lower coronary vascular reserve than those without angina (median 26 versus 76%, difference not significant). LV wall thickness and not LV volume is the critical component of left ventricular mass related to coronary reserve. No significant correlation between the decrease in coronary vascular reserve and the presence of angina pectoris was demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6218741     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80057-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy; what are appropriate therapeutic objectives?

Authors:  D J Sheridan; M P Kingsbury; N A Flores
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Differences in coronary blood flow in aortic regurgitation and systemic arterial hypertension have implications for diastolic blood pressure targets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon W Rabkin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Coronary flow reserve is supranormal in endurance athletes: an adenosine transthoracic echocardiographic study.

Authors:  D J Hildick-Smith; P J Johnson; C R Wisbey; E M Winter; L M Shapiro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Cardiac allograft hypertrophy is associated with impaired exercise tolerance after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Eugenia Raichlin; Malik A Al-Omari; Courtney L Hayes; Brooks S Edwards; Robert P Frantz; Barry A Boilson; Alfredo L Clavell; Richard J Rodeheffer; John A Schirger; Sudhir S Kushwaha; Thomas G Allison; Naveen L Pereira
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Coronary flow reserve in mitral stenosis before and after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.

Authors:  Ragab A Mahfouz; Mohammad Gouda; Waleed Elawdy; Ashraf Dewedar
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Complete reversibility of physiological coronary vascular abnormalities in hypertrophied hearts produced by pressure overload in the rat.

Authors:  S Isoyama; N Ito; M Kuroha; T Takishima
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 14.808

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.