Literature DB >> 21620776

Fusion rates of a morselized local bone graft in polyetheretherketone cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion by quantitative analysis using consecutive three-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Jae Hyup Lee1, Ji-Ho Lee, Jae-Woo Park, Hye Soo Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using harvested local bone inserted into a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage is a commonly used procedure, but the accurate fusion rate of a cage, cage to bone contact area ratio, and the changes in fusion rate with time after surgery are unknown.
PURPOSE: The aim was to conduct a quantitative analysis of the fusion rates and the cage to bone contact area ratios at each period of time using a PEEK cage in PLIF using a consecutive three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a prospective study using a consecutive 3D thin-section CT scan. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty patients aged between 37 and 73 years set to undergo elective PLIF with PEEK cages and pedicle screw fixation were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The assessments included the Korean Oswestry Disability Index (K-ODI), Short Form (SF)-36 questionnaire, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score, and dynamic plane radiographs, preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months after surgery.
METHODS: Three-dimensional CT scans were performed at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Three-dimensional CT assessments of the following were performed: fusion rate of the cage, cage to bone contact area ratio, and fusion rate of the interbody bone graft besides the cage.
RESULTS: The 6-month fusion rate of the segment was 86.7%, which increased to 90.0% at 12 months. The fusion area ratio between the cage area and end plate showed a significant increase from 52.0% at 6 months to 58.5% at 12 months. Regarding the fusion area ratio between the cage and end plate, the ratio between the lower surface of the cage was significantly higher than that of the upper surface. In addition, the K-ODI, SF-36, and VAS values were similar at 6 and 12 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The fusion rate of the PEEK cage used in PLIF measured at 12 months was higher than that measured at 6 months. Therefore, an assessment on the complete fusion of local bone at 12 months after surgery is more accurate.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620776     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.04.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  15 in total

1.  Differences in the interbody bone graft area and fusion rate between minimally invasive and traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective short-term image analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Yao; Hsi-Hsien Lin; Po-Hsin Chou; Shih-Tien Wang; Ming-Chau Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Fusion rate and influence of surgery-related factors in lumbar interbody arthrodesis for degenerative spine diseases: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  M Formica; D Vallerga; A Zanirato; L Cavagnaro; M Basso; S Divano; L Mosconi; E Quarto; G Siri; L Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2020-01-01

3.  Comparison Between 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages: 1-Year Outcome After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Do-Yeon Kim; O-Hyuk Kwon; Jeong-Yoon Park
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

4.  The use of beta-tricalcium phosphate and bone marrow aspirate as a bone graft substitute in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Ricarda Lechner; Michaela Gstöttner; Conrad Kobel; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Trabecular metal spacers as standalone or with pedicle screw augmentation, in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Erik Van de Kelft; Johan Van Goethem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation.

Authors:  Osamu Nemoto; Takashi Asazuma; Yoshiyuki Yato; Hideaki Imabayashi; Hiroki Yasuoka; Akira Fujikawa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Impact of Early Intervertebral Osseous Union After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Hiroki Ushirozako; Tomohiko Hasegawa; Shigeto Ebata; Tetsuro Ohba; Hiroki Oba; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Satoshi Shimizu; Yu Yamato; Koichiro Ide; Yosuke Shibata; Toshiyuki Ojima; Jun Takahashi; Hirotaka Haro; Yukihiro Matsuyama
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus contralateral translaminar facet screw fixation in lumbar degenerative diseases.

Authors:  Fubing Liu; Chun Jiang; Yuanwu Cao; Xiaoxing Jiang; Zhenzhou Feng
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Effects of lordotic angle of a cage on sagittal alignment and clinical outcome in one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation.

Authors:  Ji-Ho Lee; Dong-Oh Lee; Jae Hyup Lee; Hee Jong Shim
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Surgical results of lumbar interbody fusion using calcium phosphate cement.

Authors:  Motohiro Hirasawa; Hideo Mure; Hiroyuki Toi; Shinji Nagahiro
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.