PURPOSE: To compare ablation zone, local therapeutic efficacy, and complications of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with a cluster electrode versus a single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2005 to January 2009, a total of 79 consecutive patients (57 men, 22 women; mean age, 58.6 y) with 79 HCCs (range, 2.5-4.0 cm) underwent percutaneous RF ablation with a cluster electrode (n = 37) or a single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations (n = 42). These methods were compared in terms of ablation zone size on immediate follow-up computed tomography and the rates of technique effectiveness and cumulative local tumor progression on further follow-up (range, 12.0-46.2 mo; median, 24.3 mo). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. The ablation zone in the cluster group was significantly smaller in the longitudinal dimension (43.7 mm ± 4.8 vs 46.5 mm ± 5.9; P = .03), but greater in the short axial dimension (30.7 mm ± 3.9 vs 27.3 mm ± 5.5; P = .03), compared with that in the overlapping ablation group. Technique effectiveness rates in the cluster and overlap groups were 100% and 92.9% (39 of 42), respectively (P = .24). The cumulative local tumor progression rate was significantly lower in the cluster group than in the overlapping group (1- and 3- year follow-up: 8.1 and 18.8% vs 23.8 and 42.2%, P = .04). Complications were more frequent in the cluster group than in the overlapping group (27.0% vs 7.1%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In US-guided percutaneous RF ablation of medium-sized HCCs, the cluster electrode showed better local therapeutic efficacy than the single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations, probably because of the favorable shape of the ablation zone; however, complications occurred more frequently.
PURPOSE: To compare ablation zone, local therapeutic efficacy, and complications of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation of medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with a cluster electrode versus a single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2005 to January 2009, a total of 79 consecutive patients (57 men, 22 women; mean age, 58.6 y) with 79 HCCs (range, 2.5-4.0 cm) underwent percutaneous RF ablation with a cluster electrode (n = 37) or a single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations (n = 42). These methods were compared in terms of ablation zone size on immediate follow-up computed tomography and the rates of technique effectiveness and cumulative local tumor progression on further follow-up (range, 12.0-46.2 mo; median, 24.3 mo). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. The ablation zone in the cluster group was significantly smaller in the longitudinal dimension (43.7 mm ± 4.8 vs 46.5 mm ± 5.9; P = .03), but greater in the short axial dimension (30.7 mm ± 3.9 vs 27.3 mm ± 5.5; P = .03), compared with that in the overlapping ablation group. Technique effectiveness rates in the cluster and overlap groups were 100% and 92.9% (39 of 42), respectively (P = .24). The cumulative local tumor progression rate was significantly lower in the cluster group than in the overlapping group (1- and 3- year follow-up: 8.1 and 18.8% vs 23.8 and 42.2%, P = .04). Complications were more frequent in the cluster group than in the overlapping group (27.0% vs 7.1%; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In US-guided percutaneous RF ablation of medium-sized HCCs, the cluster electrode showed better local therapeutic efficacy than the single electrode with multiple overlapping ablations, probably because of the favorable shape of the ablation zone; however, complications occurred more frequently.
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Muneeb Ahmed; Luigi Solbiati; Christopher L Brace; David J Breen; Matthew R Callstrom; J William Charboneau; Min-Hua Chen; Byung Ihn Choi; Thierry de Baère; Gerald D Dodd; Damian E Dupuy; Debra A Gervais; David Gianfelice; Alice R Gillams; Fred T Lee; Edward Leen; Riccardo Lencioni; Peter J Littrup; Tito Livraghi; David S Lu; John P McGahan; Maria Franca Meloni; Boris Nikolic; Philippe L Pereira; Ping Liang; Hyunchul Rhim; Steven C Rose; Riad Salem; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Stephen B Solomon; Michael C Soulen; Masatoshi Tanaka; Thomas J Vogl; Bradford J Wood; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 3.464