Wei Yang1, Kun Yan1, Gong-Xiong Wu1, Wei Wu1, Ying Fu1, Jung-Chieh Lee1, Zhong-Yi Zhang1, Song Wang1, Min-Hua Chen1. 1. Wei Yang, Kun Yan, Wei Wu, Ying Fu, Jung-Chieh Lee, Zhong-Yi Zhang, Song Wang, Min-Hua Chen, Department of Ultrasound, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the treatment strategies and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in difficult locations and to compare the results with non-difficult HCC. METHODS: From 2004 to 2012, a total of 470 HCC patients underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA. Among these HCC patients, 382 with tumors located ≤ 5 mm from a major vessel/bile duct (n = 87), from peripheral important structures (n = 232) or from the liver capsule (n = 63) were regarded as difficult cases. There were 331 male patients and 51 female patients, with an average age of 55.3 ± 10.1 years old. A total of 235 and 147 patients had Child-Pugh class A and class B liver function, respectively. The average tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.2 cm. Individual treatment strategies were developed to treat these difficult cases. During the same period, 88 HCC patients with tumors that were not in difficult locations served as the control group. In the control group, 74 patients were male, and 14 patients were female, with an average age of 57.4 ± 11.8 years old. Of these, 62 patients and 26 patients had Child-Pugh class A and class B liver function, respectively. Regular follow-up after RFA was performed to assess treatment efficacy. Survival results were generated from Kaplan-Meier estimates, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Early tumor necrosis rate in the difficult group was similar to that in the control group (97.6% vs 94.3%, P = 0.080). The complication rate in the difficult group was significantly higher than that in the control group (4.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.041). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 116 mo, with an average of 28 ± 22.4 mo. Local progression rate in the difficult group was significantly higher than that in the control group (12.7% vs 7.1%, P = 0.046). However, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall survival rates in the difficult group were not significantly different from those in the control group (84.3%, 54.4%, 41.2%, and 29.9% vs 92.5%, 60.3%, 43.2%, and 32.8%, respectively, P = 0.371). Additionally, a multivariate analysis revealed that tumor location was not a significant risk factor for survival. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in long-term overall survival between the two groups even though the local progression rate was higher in the difficult group.
AIM: To investigate the treatment strategies and long-term outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in difficult locations and to compare the results with non-difficult HCC. METHODS: From 2004 to 2012, a total of 470 HCC patients underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA. Among these HCC patients, 382 with tumors located ≤ 5 mm from a major vessel/bile duct (n = 87), from peripheral important structures (n = 232) or from the liver capsule (n = 63) were regarded as difficult cases. There were 331 male patients and 51 female patients, with an average age of 55.3 ± 10.1 years old. A total of 235 and 147 patients had Child-Pugh class A and class B liver function, respectively. The average tumor size was 3.4 ± 1.2 cm. Individual treatment strategies were developed to treat these difficult cases. During the same period, 88 HCC patients with tumors that were not in difficult locations served as the control group. In the control group, 74 patients were male, and 14 patients were female, with an average age of 57.4 ± 11.8 years old. Of these, 62 patients and 26 patients had Child-Pugh class A and class B liver function, respectively. Regular follow-up after RFA was performed to assess treatment efficacy. Survival results were generated from Kaplan-Meier estimates, and multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. RESULTS: Early tumor necrosis rate in the difficult group was similar to that in the control group (97.6% vs 94.3%, P = 0.080). The complication rate in the difficult group was significantly higher than that in the control group (4.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.041). The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 116 mo, with an average of 28 ± 22.4 mo. Local progression rate in the difficult group was significantly higher than that in the control group (12.7% vs 7.1%, P = 0.046). However, the 1-, 3-, 5-, and 7-year overall survival rates in the difficult group were not significantly different from those in the control group (84.3%, 54.4%, 41.2%, and 29.9% vs 92.5%, 60.3%, 43.2%, and 32.8%, respectively, P = 0.371). Additionally, a multivariate analysis revealed that tumor location was not a significant risk factor for survival. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in long-term overall survival between the two groups even though the local progression rate was higher in the difficult group.
Authors: C A Lewis; T E Allen; D R Burke; J F Cardella; S J Citron; P E Cole; A T Drooz; E A Drucker; Z J Haskal; L G Martin; A Van Moore; C D Neithamer; S B Oglevie; K S Rholl; A C Roberts; D Sacks; O Sanchez; A Venbrux; C W Bakal Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 1997 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: L Solbiati; T Ierace; S N Goldberg; S Sironi; T Livraghi; R Fiocca; G Servadio; G Rizzatto; P R Mueller; A Del Maschio; G S Gazelle Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kun Yan; Min Hua Chen; Wei Yang; Yan Bin Wang; Wen Gao; Chun Yi Hao; Bao Cai Xing; Xin Fu Huang Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2007-08-31 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Tito Livraghi; Luigi Solbiati; M Franca Meloni; G Scott Gazelle; Elkan F Halpern; S Nahum Goldberg Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Yun Shin Chun; Ronnie T P Poon; Myron E Schwartz; Francis Y Yao; J Wallis Marsh; Sherrie Bhoori; Sung-Gyu Lee Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Matteo Renzulli; Nicolò Brandi; Anna Pecorelli; Luigi Vincenzo Pastore; Alessandro Granito; Giuseppe Martinese; Francesco Tovoli; Mario Simonetti; Elton Dajti; Antonio Colecchia; Rita Golfieri Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-29
Authors: Akeanong Worakitsitisatorn; David S Lu; Min Woo Lee; Nazanin H Asvadi; Amin Moshksar; Alexander D Yuen; Justin McWilliams; Steven S Raman Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Sung Il Park; Il Jung Kim; Shin Jae Lee; Min Woo Shin; Won Sun Shin; Yong Eun Chung; Gyoung Min Kim; Man Deuk Kim; Jong Yun Won; Do Yun Lee; Jin Sub Choi; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Robert Damm; Ingo Zörkler; Bela Rogits; Peter Hass; Jazan Omari; Maciej Powerski; Sigrfried Kropf; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Jens Ricke; Max Seidensticker Journal: J Contemp Brachytherapy Date: 2018-12-28