Literature DB >> 12628568

Biomechanical analysis of the effect of changing patient-handling technique.

B Schibye1, A Faber Hansen, C T Hye-Knudsen, M Essendrop, M Böcher, J Skotte.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the changes in the mechanical load on the low-back when shifting from a self-chosen to a recommended patient-handling technique. Nine female health care workers without formal education in patient-handling carried out 8 different tasks involving moving, turning and lifting situations. By means of a dynamic 3D biomechanical model of the lower part of the body, peak torque, compression and shear forces at the L4/L5 joint were compared using the two different patient-handling techniques. In 5 of the 8 tasks, a significant reduction was observed in spinal loading. Application of the recommended technique decreased the compression value significantly for all tasks with a mean value above 3000 N. For the two tasks with the highest compression values when using the self-chosen technique (4223, 4446 N), the loading was reduced with 36% and 25%, respectively. If the principles behind the recommended technique are implemented and maintained, a decrease in the risk of low-back disorders during patient-handling should thus be expected. Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12628568     DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00003-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  7 in total

1.  Effects of educational intervention on joint angles of the trunk and lower extremity and on muscle activities during patient-handling tasks.

Authors:  Toru Akebi; Masaiwa Inoue; Noriaki Harada
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Two linear regression models predicting cumulative dynamic L5/S1 joint moment during a range of lifting tasks based on static postures.

Authors:  Xu Xu; Chien-Chi Chang; Ming-Lun Lu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Characteristic values of the lumbar load of manual patient handling for the application in workers' compensation procedures.

Authors:  Claus Jordan; Alwin Luttmann; Andreas Theilmeier; Stefan Kuhn; Norbert Wortmann; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.646

4.  Quantifying relationships between selected work-related risk factors and back pain: a systematic review of objective biomechanical measures and cost-related health outcomes.

Authors:  Nancy A Nelson; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.656

5.  Effect of Repositioning Aids and Patient Weight on Biomechanical Stresses When Repositioning Patients in Bed.

Authors:  Neal Wiggermann; Jie Zhou; Nancy McGann
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Relationship between surface electromyography of the spinae erector muscles and subjectively adjusted step length in the supporting standing-up motion.

Authors:  Kodai Kitagawa; Tsuyoshi Uezono; Takayuki Nagasaki; Sota Nakano; Chikamune Wada
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2019-11-26

7.  Patient Transfers and Risk of Back Injury: Protocol for a Prospective Cohort Study With Technical Measurements of Exposure.

Authors:  Jonas Vinstrup; Pascal Madeleine; Markus Due Jakobsen; Kenneth Jay; Lars Louis Andersen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-11-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.