Literature DB >> 23771599

Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population.

F de Bruin1, M Reijnierse, V Farhang-Razi, J L Bloem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly diagnosed clinically. Controversy exists about the significance of radiographic findings. Our goal is to determine the prevalence of radiographic FAI types and parameters in a hospital population clinically not suspected of having FAI. In addition we assessed whether pain, age and gender are associated with higher prevalences.
METHODS: Three hundred ten patients were included in this retrospective study. After applying the exclusion criteria, 262 patients (522 hips) remained. Two observers scored for radiographic parameters. A generalised estimation equation, Pearson's χ(2) test and logistic regression model were used.
RESULTS: Radiographic signs of FAI were absent in only 58 hips (11.1 %). In the 40 hips (7.7 %) with cam impingement, males were more affected (P < 0.001). In the 330 hips (63.2 %) with pincer impingement, females were more often affected (P < 0.001). In the 82 hips (15.7 %) with signs of mixed type impingement, male hips were significantly (P < 0.001) more often affected. Age had some effect on the prevalence of coxa vara, acetabular index and acetabular retroversion. No correlation with pain was found.
CONCLUSIONS: In this hospital population, signs occurred at a high rate. Radiographic parameters attributed to FAI are non-specific. Especially radiographic signs attributed to pincer type impingement have a high prevalence. KEY POINTS: • Femoroacetabular impingement is associated with an abnormal configuration of the hip joint. • The prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement parameters was high in our study population. • The diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement should be made clinically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23771599     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2912-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  D Tönnis; A Heinecke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Statistical consideration for bilateral cases in orthopaedic research.

Authors:  Moon Seok Park; Sung Ju Kim; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi; Sang Hyeong Lee; Kyoung Min Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Current concepts in the management of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  J R Crawford; R N Villar
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-11

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Coxa profunda: is the deep acetabulum overcovered?

Authors:  Lucas A Anderson; Ashley L Kapron; Stephen K Aoki; Christopher L Peters
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Radiographic measurements of dysplastic adult hips.

Authors:  S Delaunay; R G Dussault; P A Kaplan; B A Alford
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Kalesha Hack; Gina Di Primio; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stephan Reichenbach; Peter Jüni; Stefan Werlen; Eveline Nüesch; Christian W Pfirrmann; Sven Trelle; Alex Odermatt; Willy Hofstetter; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; R Brian Maxwell; Todd L Johnston; Mara Schenker; Karen K Briggs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-05-12       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in a young population with hip complaints is high.

Authors:  Leah M Ochoa; Laura Dawson; Jeanne C Patzkowski; Joseph R Hsu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Gennaro Fiorentino; Alberto Fontanarosa; Riccardo Cepparulo; Alberto Guardoli; Luca Berni; Gianluca Coviello; Aldo Guardoli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-11-03

2.  Femoroacetabular impingement: normal values of the quantitative morphometric parameters in asymptomatic hips.

Authors:  Marianne Lepage-Saucier; Cécile Thiéry; Ahmed Larbi; Frédéric E Lecouvet; Bruno C Vande Berg; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Authors:  Vasco V Mascarenhas; Paulo Rego; Pedro Dantas; Augusto Gaspar; Francisco Soldado; José G Consciência
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Etiology of Femoroacetabular Impingement in Athletes: A Review of Recent Findings.

Authors:  Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Open and Arthroscopic Surgical Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Rachel M Frank; Luis Pulido
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-12-02

6.  A quantitative non-invasive assessment of femoroacetabular impingement with CT-based dynamic simulation--cadaveric validation study.

Authors:  Maarten A Röling; Monique I Visser; Edwin H G Oei; Peter Pilot; Gert-Jan Kleinrensink; Rolf M Bloem
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  INFLUENCE OF AGE ON PARAMETERS FOR FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT AND HIP DYSPLASIA IN X-RAYS.

Authors:  Ulf-Krister Hofmann; Ingmar Ipach; Ina-Christine Rondak; Roland Syha; Marco Götze; Falk Mittag
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 8.  Radiographic Diagnosis of Pincer-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chanseok Rhee; Tina Le Francois; J W Thomas Byrd; Mark Glazebrook; Ivan Wong
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-31

9.  Prevalence of Morphological Variations Associated With Femoroacetabular Impingement According to Age and Sex: A Study of 1878 Asymptomatic Hips in Nonprofessional Athletes.

Authors:  Rodolfo Morales-Avalos; Adriana Tapia-Náñez; Mario Simental-Mendía; Guillermo Elizondo-Riojas; Michelle Morcos-Sandino; Marc Tey-Pons; Víctor M Peña-Martínez; Francisco J Barrera; Santos Guzman-Lopez; Rodrigo E Elizondo-Omaña; Félix Vílchez-Cavazos
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.