Literature DB >> 21613284

Different behavioural responses to anthropogenic noise by two closely related passerine birds.

Clinton D Francis1, Catherine P Ortega, Alexander Cruz.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise, now common to many landscapes, can impair acoustic communication for many species, yet some birds compensate for masking by noise by altering their songs. The phylogenetic distribution of these noise-dependent signal adjustments is uncertain, and it is not known whether closely related species respond similarly to noise. Here, we investigated the influence of noise on habitat occupancy rates and vocal frequency in two congeneric vireos with similar song features. Noise exposure did not influence occupancy rates for either species, yet song features of both changed, albeit in different ways. With increases in noise levels, plumbeous vireos (Vireo plumbeus) sang shorter songs with higher minimum frequencies. By contrast, grey vireos (Vireo vicinior) sang longer songs with higher maximum frequencies. These findings support the notion that vocal plasticity may help some species occupy noisy areas, but because there were no commonalities among the signal changes exhibited by these closely related birds, it may be difficult to predict how diverse species may modify their signals in an increasingly noisy world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613284      PMCID: PMC3210660          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

Review 1.  Bird song, ecology and speciation.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Thomas B Smith
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Vocal frequency change reflects different responses to anthropogenic noise in two suboscine tyrant flycatchers.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; Kevin R Crooks; Kurt M Fristrup
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Cities change the songs of birds.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Ardie den Boer-Visser
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Behavioral plasticity allows short-term adjustment to a novel environment.

Authors:  Karin Gross; Gilberto Pasinelli; Hansjoerg P Kunc
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive?

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 9.  Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation.

Authors:  Hans Slabbekoorn; Erwin A P Ripmeester
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Katrin Voss; Ireen Köllmer; Dietmar Todt
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total
  8 in total

1.  Is sociality required for the evolution of communicative complexity? Evidence weighed against alternative hypotheses in diverse taxonomic groups.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Joan Garcia-Porta
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Noise pollution alters ecological services: enhanced pollination and disrupted seed dispersal.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Nathan J Kleist; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Experimentally broadcast ocean surf and river noise alters birdsong.

Authors:  Veronica A Reed; Cory A Toth; Ryan N Wardle; Dylan G E Gomes; Jesse R Barber; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.061

4.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Nadia Pieretti; Sue Anne Zollinger; Nicole Geberzahn; Jesko Partecke; Ana Catarina Miranda; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Rapid recovery following short-term acoustic disturbance in two fish species.

Authors:  Rick Bruintjes; Julia Purser; Kirsty A Everley; Stephanie Mangan; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  No evidence of repeated song divergence across multiple urban and non-urban populations of dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis) in Southern California.

Authors:  Felisha Wong; Eleanor S Diamant; Marlene Walters; Pamela J Yeh
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.653

8.  Increased noise levels have different impacts on the anti-predator behaviour of two sympatric fish species.

Authors:  Irene K Voellmy; Julia Purser; Stephen D Simpson; Andrew N Radford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.