Literature DB >> 21612928

Psychological impact of recall on women with BRCA mutations undergoing MRI surveillance.

Tirtza N Spiegel1, Mary Jane Esplen, Kimberley A Hill, Jiahui Wong, Petrina A Causer, Ellen Warner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The addition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to mammography for surveillance of women with BRCA mutations significantly increases sensitivity but lowers specificity. This study aimed to examine whether MRI surveillance, and particularly recall, is associated with increased anxiety, depression, or breast cancer worry/distress.
METHODS: Women with BRCA mutations in an MRI surveillance study were invited to complete: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Lerman's Breast Cancer Worry Scale, Breast Cancer Worry Interference Scale, and a quality of life rating at 3 time points: 1-2 weeks before (T1), 4-6 weeks after (T2) and 6 months after their annual surveillance (T3). Repeated measures analyses were performed over the 3 time points for recalled and non-recalled women.
RESULTS: 55 women (30 BRCA1, 25 BRCA2) completed study instruments at T1 and T2, and 48 at T3. Eighteen women (32%) were recalled for additional imaging. At T1, 27 women (49%) were above HADS threshold for "possible cases" for anxiety (score≥8). Recalled (but not non-recalled) women had a significant increase of HADS anxiety at T2 which dropped to below baseline by T3. No group differences were observed in terms of change over time in other quantitative psychological measures.
CONCLUSIONS: While breast MRI surveillance did not have a detrimental psychological impact on women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, recalling these very high-risk women for further imaging after a false positive MRI scan temporarily increased their global anxiety.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612928     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  11 in total

1.  Scan-associated distress in lung cancer: Quantifying the impact of "scanxiety".

Authors:  Joshua M Bauml; Andrea Troxel; C Neill Epperson; Roger B Cohen; Kathryn Schmitz; Carrie Stricker; Lawrence N Shulman; Angela Bradbury; Jun J Mao; Corey J Langer
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Yonglan Zheng; Hiroyuki Abe; Kristen Whitaker; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Tom Walsh; David Schacht; Kirti Kulkarni; Deepa Sheth; Marion S Verp; Angela R Bradbury; Jane Churpek; Elias Obeid; Jeffrey Mueller; Galina Khramtsova; Fang Liu; Akila Raoul; Hongyuan Cao; Iris L Romero; Susan Hong; Robert Livingston; Nora Jaskowiak; Xiaoming Wang; Marcio Debiasi; Colin C Pritchard; Mary-Claire King; Gregory Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Dezheng Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  COVID-19 Experiences Predicting High Anxiety and Depression Among a Sample of BRCA1/BRCA2-positive Women in the US.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  Res Sq       Date:  2021-08-09

4.  Physician trust moderates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and cancer worry interference among women with Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torbit; Jenna J Albiani; Melyssa Aronson; Spring Holter; Kara Semotiuk; Zane Cohen; Tae L Hart
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-01-13

5.  Psychological consequences of MRI-based screening among women with strong family histories of breast cancer.

Authors:  Matthew Castelo; Zachary Brown; Josephine A D'Abbondanza; Nastasia V Wasilewski; Andrea Eisen; Derek Muradali; Bettina E Hansen; Eva Grunfeld; Adena S Scheer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Rebekah Kwa; Sarah Ephraums; Mathilda Wilding; Lavvina Thiyagarajan; Jane Fleming; Katrina Moore; Yemima Berman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.446

7.  Repeated nipple fluid aspiration: compliance and feasibility results from a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  J S de Groot; C B Moelans; S G Elias; A Hennink; B Verolme; K P M Suijkerbuijk; A Jager; C Seynaeve; P Bos; A J Witkamp; M G E M Ausems; P J van Diest; E van der Wall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Kathryn P Lowry; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; J Shannon Swan; Tina Motazedi; Elkan F Halpern; Anna N A Tosteson; G Scott Gazelle; Karen Donelan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  COVID-19 experiences predicting high anxiety and depression among a sample of BRCA1/BRCA2-positive women in the US.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Implementation and evaluation of a nurse-led decision-coaching program for healthy breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2) mutation carriers: a study protocol for the randomized controlled EDCP-BRCA study.

Authors:  A Isselhard; M Töpper; B Berger-Höger; A Steckelberg; H Fischer; F Vitinius; K Beifus; J Köberlein-Neu; R Wiedemann; K Rhiem; R Schmutzler; S Stock
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.