Literature DB >> 21612859

Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.

Seong Cheol Kim1, Cheryn Song, Wansuk Kim, Taejin Kang, Jinsung Park, In Gab Jeong, Sangmi Lee, Yong Mee Cho, Hanjong Ahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early studies reported comparative results of functional outcomes between robot-assisted (RARP) and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP). However, well-controlled single-surgeon prospective studies comparing the outcomes are rare.
OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcomes after RARP and RRP performed by a single surgeon, and to identify factors predictive of early return of continence and potency. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 763 consecutive patients undergoing RP between 2007 and 2010 were prospectively included and serially followed postoperatively for comparative analysis. INTERVENTION: RARP was performed in 528 patients, and 235 underwent RRP. MEASUREMENTS: Continence was defined as being completely pad free. Potency was defined as having erection sufficient for intercourse with or without a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. Continence and potency recovery were checked serially by interview and questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards method analyses was performed to determine predictive factors for early recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After the initial 132 cases, patients who underwent RARP demonstrated faster recovery of urinary continence compared to RRP patients. Potency recovery was more rapid in the RARP group at all evaluation time points, beginning from the initial cases. In multivariate analysis, younger age and longer preoperative membranous urethral length seen by prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated statistical significance as independent prognostic factors for continence recovery; younger age, surgical method (RARP vs RRP), and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery. The limitations of the present study were that it was nonrandomized and used interview to evaluate potency recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients after RARP demonstrated superior functional recovery. Moreover, membranous urethral length on preoperative MRI and patient age were factors independently predictive of continence recovery, while patient age and higher preoperative serum testosterone were independent prognostic factors for potency recovery.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612859     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  35 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative Membranous Urethral Length Measurement and Continence Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sean F Mungovan; Jaspreet S Sandhu; Oguz Akin; Neil A Smart; Petra L Graham; Manish I Patel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Development and validation of nomograms to predict the recovery of urinary continence after radical prostatectomy: comparisons between immediate, early, and late continence.

Authors:  Seong Jin Jeong; Jae Seung Yeon; Jeong Keun Lee; Woo Heon Cha; Jin Woo Jeong; Byung Ki Lee; Sang Cheol Lee; Chang Wook Jeong; Jeong Hyun Kim; Sung Kyu Hong; Seok-Soo Byun; Sang Eun Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  [Minimally invasive vs. open surgical procedures in the treatment of prostate cancer].

Authors:  M Wirth; M Fröhner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  G Hatiboglu; D Teber; D Tichy; S Pahernik; B Hadaschik; J Nyarangi-Dix; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Factors predicting outcomes of penile rehabilitation with udenafil 50 mg following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  T-H Kim; Y-S Ha; S H Choi; E S Yoo; B W Kim; S-J Yun; W-J Kim; Y S Kwon; T G Kwon
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience.

Authors:  Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira; Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães; Thiago Camelo Mourão; Ricardo de Lima Favaretto; Thiago Borges Marques Santana; Ademar Lopes; Stenio de Cassio Zequi
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  Evaluation of Incontinence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Using the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Short Form and Noting the Number of Safety Pads Needed by Japanese Patients.

Authors:  Katsuya Hikita; Masashi Honda; Bunya Kawamoto; Panagiota Tsounapi; Kuniyasu Muraoka; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 1.641

Review 9.  Prevalence of post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction and a review of the recommended therapeutic modalities.

Authors:  Thiago Fernandes Negris Lima; Joshua Bitran; Fabio Stefano Frech; Ranjith Ramasamy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.896

10.  Biochemical outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with follow-up more than 5-years.

Authors:  Kwang Hyun Kim; Sey Kiat Lim; Tae-Young Shin; Byung Ha Chung; Sung Joon Hong; Koon Ho Rha
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.