Literature DB >> 21611188

Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals attentional feedback to area V1 during serial visual search.

Laura Dugué1, Philippe Marque, Rufin VanRullen.   

Abstract

Visual search tasks have been used to understand how, where and when attention influences visual processing. Current theories suggest the involvement of a high-level "saliency map" that selects a candidate location to focus attentional resources. For a parallel (or "pop-out") task, the first chosen location is systematically the target, but for a serial (or "difficult") task, the system may cycle on a few distractors before finally focusing on the target. This implies that attentional effects upon early visual areas, involving feedback from higher areas, should be visible at longer latencies during serial search. A previous study from Juan & Walsh (2003) had used Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to support this conclusion; however, only a few post-stimulus delays were compared, and no control TMS location was used. Here we applied TMS double-pulses (sub-threshold) to induce a transient inhibition of area V1 at every post-stimulus delay between 100 ms and 500 ms (50 ms steps). The search array was presented either at the location affected by the TMS pulses (previously identified by applying several pulses at supra-threshold intensity to induce phosphene perception), or in the opposite hemifield, which served as a retinotopically-defined control location. Two search tasks were used: a parallel (+ among Ls) and a serial one (T among Ls). TMS specifically impaired the serial, but not the parallel search. We highlight an involvement of V1 in serial search 300 ms after the onset; conversely, V1 did not contribute to parallel search at delays beyond 100 ms. This study supports the idea that serial search differs from parallel search by the presence of additional cycles of a select-and-focus iterative loop between V1 and higher-level areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21611188      PMCID: PMC3096634          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  27 in total

1.  Focal attention in visual search.

Authors:  H C Nothdurft
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat.

Authors:  Antoni Valero-Cabré; Bertram R Payne; Jarrett Rushmore; Stephen G Lomber; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search.

Authors:  Roger Kalla; Neil G Muggleton; Chi-Hung Juan; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Neil G Muggleton; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Feature binding, attention and object perception.

Authors:  A Treisman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Crossed reduction of human motor cortex excitability by 1-Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  E M Wassermann; F R Wedegaertner; U Ziemann; M S George; R Chen
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996.

Authors:  E M Wassermann
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-01

8.  The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search.

Authors:  M Carrasco; Y Yeshurun
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual latencies in areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey.

Authors:  L G Nowak; M H Munk; P Girard; J Bullier
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.

Authors:  J Palmer; C T Ames; D T Lindsey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  8 in total

1.  The flickering wheel illusion: when α rhythms make a static wheel flicker.

Authors:  Rodika Sokoliuk; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Extinguishing Exogenous Attention via Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Periodic attention operates faster during more complex visual search.

Authors:  Garance Merholz; Laetitia Grabot; Rufin VanRullen; Laura Dugué
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Attention Reorients Periodically.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Mariel Roberts; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Intrinsic Perceptual and Attentional Rhythms.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Contribution of FEF to Attentional Periodicity during Visual Search: A TMS Study.

Authors:  Laura Dugué; Alexy-Assaf Beck; Philippe Marque; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-24

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) facilitates overall visual search response times but does not interact with visual search task factors.

Authors:  Kyongje Sung; Barry Gordon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  α Phase-Amplitude Tradeoffs Predict Visual Perception.

Authors:  Camille Fakche; Rufin VanRullen; Philippe Marque; Laura Dugué
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2022-02-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.