Literature DB >> 21610223

Age-period-cohort models in cancer surveillance research: ready for prime time?

Philip S Rosenberg, William F Anderson.   

Abstract

Standard descriptive methods for the analysis of cancer surveillance data include canonical plots based on the lexis diagram, directly age-standardized rates (ASR), estimated annual percentage change (EAPC), and joinpoint regression. The age-period-cohort (APC) model has been used less often. Here, we argue that it merits much broader use. First, we describe close connections between estimable functions of the model parameters and standard quantities such as the ASR, EAPC, and joinpoints. Estimable functions have the added value of being fully adjusted for period and cohort effects, and generally more precise. Second, the APC model provides the descriptive epidemiologist with powerful new tools, including rigorous statistical methods for comparative analyses, and the ability to project the future burden of cancer. We illustrate these principles by using invasive female breast cancer incidence in the United States, but these concepts apply equally well to other cancer sites for incidence or mortality. ©2011 AACR

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21610223      PMCID: PMC3132831          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  51 in total

1.  Simultaneous modelling of time trends and regional variation in mortality rates.

Authors:  C Robertson; R Ecob
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates.

Authors:  H J Kim; M P Fay; E J Feuer; D N Midthune
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 3.  Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture.

Authors:  D M Parkin; F I Bray; S S Devesa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Implications of birth cohort patterns in interpreting trends in breast cancer rates.

Authors:  R E Tarone; K C Chu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-09-16       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I: Age-period and age-cohort models.

Authors:  D Clayton; E Schifflers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models.

Authors:  D Clayton; E Schifflers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Nonparametric evaluation of birth cohort trends in disease rates.

Authors:  R E Tarone; K C Chu
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2000

10.  Examination of temporal trends in the incidence of childhood leukaemias and lymphomas provides aetiological clues.

Authors:  R J McNally; D P Cairns; O B Eden; A M Kelsey; G M Taylor; J M Birch
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  44 in total

1.  Ovarian cancer incidence trends in relation to changing patterns of menopausal hormone therapy use in the United States.

Authors:  Hannah P Yang; William F Anderson; Philip S Rosenberg; Britton Trabert; Gretchen L Gierach; Nicolas Wentzensen; Kathleen A Cronin; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Trends in stage-specific incidence rates for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States: 1988 to 2006.

Authors:  Matthew E Nielsen; Angela B Smith; Anne-Marie Meyer; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Seth Tyree; William Y Kim; Matthew I Milowsky; Raj S Pruthi; Robert C Millikan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Evolution of the Oropharynx Cancer Epidemic in the United States: Moderation of Increasing Incidence in Younger Individuals and Shift in the Burden to Older Individuals.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Ana F Best; Zachary S Zumsteg; Maura L Gillison; Philip S Rosenberg; Anil K Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Future of testicular germ cell tumor incidence in the United States: Forecast through 2026.

Authors:  Armen A Ghazarian; Scott P Kelly; Sean F Altekruse; Philip S Rosenberg; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Modeling Drinking Behavior Progression in Youth with Cross-sectional Data: Solving an Under-identified Probabilistic Discrete Event System.

Authors:  Xingdi Hu; Xinguang Chen; Robert L Cook; Ding-Geng Chen; Chukwuemeka Okafor
Journal:  Curr HIV Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.581

6.  Increasing lung cancer death rates among young women in southern and midwestern States.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Jiemin Ma; Philip S Rosenberg; Rebecca Siegel; William F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A web tool for age-period-cohort analysis of cancer incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; David P Check; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Common Model Inputs Used in CISNET Collaborative Breast Cancer Modeling.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Aimee M Near; Diana L Miglioretti; Diego Munoz; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Ronald Gangnon; Allison W Kurian; Harald Weedon-Fekjaer; Kathleen A Cronin; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Breast cancer in Portugal: Temporal trends and age-specific incidence by geographic regions.

Authors:  Gonçalo Forjaz de Lacerda; Scott P Kelly; Joana Bastos; Clara Castro; Alexandra Mayer; Angela B Mariotto; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Are incidence rates of adult leukemia in the United States significantly associated with birth cohort?

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; Katherine L Wilson; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.