Literature DB >> 24122346

Trends in stage-specific incidence rates for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States: 1988 to 2006.

Matthew E Nielsen1, Angela B Smith, Anne-Marie Meyer, Tzy-Mey Kuo, Seth Tyree, William Y Kim, Matthew I Milowsky, Raj S Pruthi, Robert C Millikan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer is notable for a striking heterogeneity of disease-specific risks. Among the approximately 75% of incident cases found to be superficial to the muscularis propria at the time of presentation (non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer), the risk of progression to the lethal phenotype of muscle-invasive disease is strongly associated with stage and grade of disease. Given the suggestion of an increasing percentage of low-risk cases in hospital-based registry data in recent years, the authors hypothesized that population-based data may reveal changes in the stage distribution of early-stage cases.
METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data were used to examine trends for the stage-specific incidence of bladder cancer between 1988 and 2006, adjusted for age, race, and sex, using Joinpoint and nonparametric tests.
RESULTS: The adjusted incidence rate of papillary noninvasive (Ta) predominantly low grade (77%) disease was found to increase from 5.52 to 9.09 per 100,000 population (P < .0001), with an average annual percentage change of +3.3. Over the same period, concomitant, albeit smaller, decreases were observed for flat in situ (Tis) and lamina propria-invasive (T1) disease (2.57 to 1.19 and 6.65 to 4.61 per 100,000 population [both P < .0001]; average annual percent change of -5.0 and -1.6, respectively). The trend was most dramatic among patients in the oldest age strata, suggesting a previously unappreciated cohort phenomenon.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings of the current study should motivate further epidemiological investigations of differential associations of genetic and environmental factors with different bladder cancer phenotypes as well as further scrutiny of clinical practice guideline recommendations for the growing subgroup of predominantly older patients with lower-risk disease.
© 2013 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bladder cancer; carcinogenesis; epidemiology; incidence; stage migration

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24122346      PMCID: PMC3964001          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  29 in total

1.  Prospective study of FGFR3 mutations as a prognostic factor in nonmuscle invasive urothelial bladder carcinomas.

Authors:  Silvia Hernández; Elena López-Knowles; Josep Lloreta; Manolis Kogevinas; Alex Amorós; Adonina Tardón; Alfredo Carrato; Consol Serra; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Age-period-cohort models in cancer surveillance research: ready for prime time?

Authors:  Philip S Rosenberg; William F Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Occupation and cancer of the lower urinary tract.

Authors:  P Cole; R Hoover; G H Friedell
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Smoking and cancer of the lower urinary tract.

Authors:  P Cole; R R Monson; H Haning; G H Friedell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1971-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Comparing standardized rates of events.

Authors:  K C Carriere; L L Roos
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Cigarette smoking and subtypes of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Xuejuan Jiang; J Esteban Castelao; Jian-Min Yuan; Mariana C Stern; David V Conti; Victoria K Cortessis; Malcolm C Pike; Manuela Gago-Dominguez
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Evaluation and follow-up strategies for superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  S Machele Donat
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.241

9.  FGFR3 and P53 characterize alternative genetic pathways in the pathogenesis of urothelial cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Bas W G van Rhijn; Theo H van der Kwast; André N Vis; Wim J Kirkels; Egbert R Boevé; Adriaan C Jöbsis; Ellen C Zwarthoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Medicare payments from diagnosis to death for elderly cancer patients by stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  G F Riley; A L Potosky; J D Lubitz; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  58 in total

1.  Overall and recurrence-free survival among black and white bladder cancer patients in an equal-access health system.

Authors:  Jill K Schinkel; Stephanie Shao; Shelia H Zahm; Katherine A McGlynn; Craig D Shriver; Kangmin Zhu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Contemporary gender-specific outcomes in Germany after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Marianne Schmid; Shahrokh F Shariat; Armin Soave; Oliver Engel; Margit Fisch; Michael Rink
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Developing proteomic biomarkers for bladder cancer: towards clinical application.

Authors:  Maria Frantzi; Agnieszka Latosinska; Leif Flühe; Marie C Hupe; Elena Critselis; Mario W Kramer; Axel S Merseburger; Harald Mischak; Antonia Vlahou
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Expectant Management of Low-Risk Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary L Smith; Mark S Soloway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Increasing use of positron emission tomography among medicare beneficiaries undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Avinash Maganty; Robert M Turner; Jonathan G Yabes; Dwight E Heron; Jeffrey R Gingrich; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.520

6.  Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer cystoscopic surveillance: from overuse to underuse and non-adherence impact.

Authors:  Leonardo O Reis
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-12

7.  Second-line systemic therapies for metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a population-based cohort analysis.

Authors:  E S Tsang; C Forbes; K N Chi; B J Eigl; S Parimi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Performance Measurement and Quality Improvement Initiatives for Bladder Cancer Care.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Determinants of Survival for Adolescents and Young Adults with Urothelial Bladder Cancer: Results from the California Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Joshua Lara; Ann Brunson; Theresa H M Keegan; Marcio Malogolowkin; Chong-Xian Pan; Stanley Yap; Ralph deVere White
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Recent advances in the use of therapeutic cancer vaccines in genitourinary malignancies.

Authors:  Ira Surolia; James Gulley; Ravi A Madan
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.