PURPOSE: After a report from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in 2002, a precipitous decline in menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) use in the United States was linked to a decline in breast cancer incidence rates. Given that MHT use is also associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, we tested whether ovarian cancer incidence rates changed after 2002. METHODS: Using the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries database (1995 to 2008; N = 171,142 incident ovarian cancers), we applied standard analytic approaches and age-period-cohort (APC) models to estimate ovarian cancer incidence rate changes before (1995 to 2002) and after (2003 to 2008) the WHI report. RESULTS: Among women age ≥ 50 years, age-standardized ovarian cancer incidence declined by 0.8% per year (95% CI, -1.8% to -0.5% per year) before the WHI announcement; after the WHI report, the rate declined by 2.4% per year (95% CI, -2.5% to -2.2% per year). APC models confirmed an accelerated decline in ovarian cancer incidence after the WHI report, adjusted for age and birth cohort effects. This sudden change was notable among women most likely to have used MHT (ie, women age 50 to 69 years, white women, and residents of regions with highest MHT prescription frequency). The largest changes were found for the endometrioid histologic subtype. CONCLUSION: After a marked reduction in MHT use around 2002, ovarian cancer incidence rates demonstrated an accelerated decline, with the largest changes for endometrioid carcinomas. This strong temporal association, although not proving a causal role of hormones in ovarian carcinogenesis, suggests that future analytic research supporting cancer control efforts should clarify the role of hormonal exposures on the development and behavior of subtypes of ovarian cancer.
PURPOSE: After a report from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) in 2002, a precipitous decline in menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT) use in the United States was linked to a decline in breast cancer incidence rates. Given that MHT use is also associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, we tested whether ovarian cancer incidence rates changed after 2002. METHODS: Using the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries database (1995 to 2008; N = 171,142 incident ovarian cancers), we applied standard analytic approaches and age-period-cohort (APC) models to estimate ovarian cancer incidence rate changes before (1995 to 2002) and after (2003 to 2008) the WHI report. RESULTS: Among women age ≥ 50 years, age-standardized ovarian cancer incidence declined by 0.8% per year (95% CI, -1.8% to -0.5% per year) before the WHI announcement; after the WHI report, the rate declined by 2.4% per year (95% CI, -2.5% to -2.2% per year). APC models confirmed an accelerated decline in ovarian cancer incidence after the WHI report, adjusted for age and birth cohort effects. This sudden change was notable among women most likely to have used MHT (ie, women age 50 to 69 years, white women, and residents of regions with highest MHT prescription frequency). The largest changes were found for the endometrioid histologic subtype. CONCLUSION: After a marked reduction in MHT use around 2002, ovarian cancer incidence rates demonstrated an accelerated decline, with the largest changes for endometrioid carcinomas. This strong temporal association, although not proving a causal role of hormones in ovarian carcinogenesis, suggests that future analytic research supporting cancer control efforts should clarify the role of hormonal exposures on the development and behavior of subtypes of ovarian cancer.
Authors: Janet S Hildebrand; Susan M Gapstur; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Lauren R Teras; Michael J Thun; Alpa V Patel Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Limin X Clegg; Eric J Feuer; Douglas N Midthune; Michael P Fay; Benjamin F Hankey Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-10-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Victor G Vogel; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Walter M Cronin; Reena S Cecchini; James N Atkins; Therese B Bevers; Louis Fehrenbacher; Eduardo R Pajon; James L Wade; André Robidoux; Richard G Margolese; Joan James; Carolyn D Runowicz; Patricia A Ganz; Steven E Reis; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Leslie G Ford; V Craig Jordan; Norman Wolmark Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2010-04-19
Authors: Diana S M Buist; Katherine M Newton; Diana L Miglioretti; Kevin Beverly; Maureen T Connelly; Susan Andrade; Cynthia L Hartsfield; Feifei Wei; K Arnold Chan; Larry Kessler Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Peter M Ravdin; Kathleen A Cronin; Nadia Howlader; Christine D Berg; Rowan T Chlebowski; Eric J Feuer; Brenda K Edwards; Donald A Berry Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-04-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Britton Trabert; Louise A Brinton; Garnet L Anderson; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Roni T Falk; Howard D Strickler; Sarunas Sliesoraitis; Lewis H Kuller; Margery L Gass; Barbara J Fuhrman; Xia Xu; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: J Ribes; L Esteban; R Clèries; J Galceran; R Marcos-Gragera; R Gispert; A Ameijide; M L Vilardell; J Borras; A Puigdefabregas; M Buxó; A Freitas; A Izquierdo; J M Borras Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Suzanne C Dixon-Suen; Penelope M Webb; Louise F Wilson; Karen Tuesley; Louise M Stewart; Susan J Jordan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Jennifer A Doherty; Allan Jensen; Linda E Kelemen; Celeste L Pearce; Elizabeth Poole; Joellen M Schildkraut; Kathryn L Terry; Shelley S Tworoger; Penelope M Webb; Nicolas Wentzensen Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 13.506