Literature DB >> 21609426

A quantitative association study of SLC25A12 and restricted repetitive behavior traits in autism spectrum disorders.

Soo-Jeong Kim1, Raquel M Silva, Cindi G Flores, Suma Jacob, Stephen Guter, Gregory Valcante, Annette M Zaytoun, Edwin H Cook, Judith A Badner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: SLC25A12 was previously identified by a linkage-directed association analysis in autism. In this study, we investigated the relationship between three SLC25A12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (rs2056202, rs908670 and rs2292813) and restricted repetitive behavior (RRB) traits in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), based on a positive correlation between the G allele of rs2056202 and an RRB subdomain score on the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R).
METHODS: We used the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R) as a quantitative RRB measure, and conducted linear regression analyses for individual SNPs and a previously identified haplotype (rs2056202-rs2292813). We examined associations in our University of Illinois at Chicago-University of Florida (UIC-UF) sample (179 unrelated individuals with an ASD), and then attempted to replicate our findings in the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC) sample (720 ASD families).
RESULTS: In the UIC-UF sample, three RBS-R scores (ritualistic, sameness, sum) had positive associations with the A allele of rs2292813 (p = 0.006-0.012) and with the rs2056202-rs2292813 haplotype (omnibus test, p = 0.025-0.040). The SSC sample had positive associations between the A allele of rs2056202 and four RBS-R scores (stereotyped, sameness, restricted, sum) (p = 0.006-0.010), between the A allele of rs908670 and three RBS-R scores (stereotyped, self-injurious, sum) (p = 0.003-0.015), and between the rs2056202-rs2292813 haplotype and six RBS-R scores (stereotyped, self-injurious, compulsive, sameness, restricted, sum)(omnibus test, p = 0.002-0.028). Taken together, the A alleles of rs2056202 and rs2292813 were consistently and positively associated with RRB traits in both the UIC-UF and SSC samples, but the most significant SNP with phenotype association varied in each dataset.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed an association between SLC25A12 and RRB traits in ASDs, but the direction of the association was different from that in the initial study. This could be due to the examined SLC25A12 SNPs being in linkage disequilibrium with another risk allele, and/or genetic/phenotypic heterogeneity of the ASD samples across studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21609426      PMCID: PMC3123633          DOI: 10.1186/2040-2392-2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Autism            Impact factor:   7.509


Background

Autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are characterized by qualitative impairments in reciprocal social interaction and communication, and by the presence of restricted repetitive behavior (RRB) [1]. ASDs are highly heritable complex genetic disorders with rare variants, oligogenic inheritance, and interactions between susceptibility alleles [2-8]. The heterogeneity of ASDs makes it difficult to identify risk alleles, but also supports the validity of a model that requires more than one genetic variant to contribute to the full syndrome of autism [9,10]. SLC25A12 (solute carrier family 25 member 12; OMIM *603667) on chromosome 2q24 encodes aralar, a mitochondrial aspartate-glutamate carrier isoform 1 (AGC1) protein. SLC25A12 spans about 110 kb. SLC25A12 was initially identified as an autism-susceptibility gene through a linkage-directed association study and replication [11-14]. For instance, two independent groups reported overtransmission of the G alleles of two SLC25A12 SNPs in intron 3 (rs2056202) and intron 16 (rs2292813) in autism families [12,13]. Other groups also reported overtransmission of the G allele of either rs2056202 [11] or rs2292813 [14], or undertransmission of the A-A haplotype of rs2056202-rs2292813 [14] in autism families. Most recently, the G allele of rs908670, another SLC25A12 SNP in intron 8, showed an evidence for overtransmission in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) by the Autism Genome Project (AGP) Consortium (p = 0.0006 in combined AGP, Autism Genetic Resource Exchange (AGRE), and Study on Addiction: Genetics and Environment (SAGE) samples) [15]. However, not all studies have found evidence for association between SLC25A12 and autism [16-19]. This conflicting data may be explained by differences in phenotypic characteristics and/or genetic heterogeneity across study samples. Interestingly, Silverman et al. (2008) examined the correlation between SLC25A12 and phenotypic data obtained from the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), and found a positive correlation between the G allele of rs2056202 and an RRB-related subdomain, the 'routines and rituals' score [20]. This subdomain consists of two ADI-R items: 'verbal rituals' and 'compulsion/ritualistic behavior'. However, apart from the Silverman study, no other studies have examined the association between SLC25A12 and quantitative RRB traits. In the present study, we hypothesized that SLC25A12 may confer risk for quantitative RRB traits in ASDs. We tested this hypothesis by examining associations between three SLC25A12 SNPs (rs2056202, rs908670 and rs2292813) and the Repetitive Behavior Scale-Revised (RBS-R), a quantitative measure of RRB. We examined associations first in our University of Illinois at Chicago-University of Florida (UIC-UF) sample (179 unrelated people with an ASD), and then attempted to replicate our findings in the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC) sample (720 ASD families). Because the SSC sample has parental genotype data available for these SNPs, we also examined transmission disequilibrium using family-based association tests.

Methods

Subjects and assessment

UIC-UF sample

This study was approved by the UIC and UF Institutional review boards (IRBs). All participants were provided with a description of the study before informed consent was obtained. The study participants (179 unrelated people with an ASD) were recruited mainly from two geographical regions (UIC sample from the Chicago, Illinois area; UF sample from north central Florida). All UIC participants were assessed with the ADI-R [21] and the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) [22]. For this report, we required all subjects to meet ASD or autism classification on both ADI-R and ADOS, along with a best-estimate diagnosis of an ASD (i.e., autistic disorder, Asperger disorder, or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified) by the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) [1]. We excluded probands with an insufficient DNA sample for genotyping, and/or who lacked RBS-R data. In total, 88 probands (75 male, 13 female; mean age 8.3 ± 4.8 years) were identified as meeting the above criteria as of the data freeze on 1 December 2009, coinciding with data submission to National Database for Autism Research. In this group, 64.8% of participants were white; 6.8% were on concurrent psychotropic medications (these subjects were excluded from the neurochemical analyses of Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE) but were included for this report); and 72.7% were classified as 'strictly defined autism', as they met the autism classification on both ADI-R and ADOS. There were seven missing RBS-R data points (completion rate of 99.8%). These missing data points were treated as 'missing' for both affected subscale and sum scores. For the UF sample, the inclusion criteria were chronological age between 6 and 18 years, clinical diagnosis of an ASD, sufficient DNA sample available for genotyping, and an absence of any specific genetic diagnosis. Because the UF sample was recruited primarily from a mail survey study, an independent validation of the clinical diagnoses was not conducted, therefore, we used the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) [23] and excluded anyone with an SCQ total score less than 15 in this report, as a validation study had suggested that the SCQ discriminated well between patients with ASD and those with non-ASD, with a sensitivity of 0.85 and a specificity of 0.75 [24]. The UF sample consisted of 91 subjects with an ASD (75 male, 16 female; mean age 10.8 ± 3.6 years); 74.7% were white and 63.7% were on concurrent psychotropic medications. There were no missing RBS-R data points in the UF sample.

SSC sample

The phenotype and genotype data were obtained through the Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (SFARI) Base [25] with approval from the UF IRB and SSC. In total, 737 probands had available genotype data released on 27 July 2010; we excluded seventeen probands for this report; three probands who were twins of designated probands, and fourteen probands whose phenotypic data were not yet available from the SFARI collection version 10 released on 1 November 2010. Therefore, the SSC sample used in this report included 720 children (age 6.9 ± 2.8 years) who met the criteria for ASD or autism on both the ADI-R and ADOS (563 with 'strictly defined autism') and their biological parents (720 trio families). There were 620 male and 100 female children, and 81% of the children were white. There were 56 missing RBS-R data points (completion rate 99.8%), which were treated as 'missing' for both affected subscale and sum scores.

RRB assessment

We used the RBS-R as our primary RRB measure. The RBS-R is an empirically derived, standardized and psychometrically sound rating scale, targeting a variety of abnormal repetitive behaviors [26,27]. The RBS-R includes forty-three individual items grouped into six empirically derived subscales: stereotyped behavior, self-injurious behavior, compulsive behavior, ritualistic behavior, sameness behavior, restricted behavior, and a sum score. A recent factor analysis by Lam and Aman (2007) produced a five-factor solution; stereotyped behavior, self-injurious behavior, compulsive behavior, ritualistic/sameness behavior and restricted interests [28].

SNP genotyping

Three SLC25A12 SNPs (rs2056202, rs908670, rs2292813) were selected for this study, because rs2056202 and rs2292813 were the original two SNPs associated with ASDs, and rs908670 was the most strongly associated SNP within SLC25A12 in the AGP GWAS [15]. The SNPs were genotyped using a commercial assay (TaqMan® SNP Genotyping Assay; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) for the UIC-UF sample. For the SSC sample, the genotype data for these SNPs were available from the Illumina® 1M/1Mduo Genechip data (https://sfari.org/sfari-base).

Statistical analyses

The associations between quantitative RRB measures (RBS-R subscale and sum scores) and specific SNPs or haplotypes were tested using linear regression analyses, as implemented in PLINK (http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/). The '--hap-omnibus' option was used to jointly estimate all haplotype effects at that position. The potential confounding factors including age, gender, population (white versus non-white) and recruitment site (UIC versus UF for the UIC-UF sample), were treated as covariates. For the SSC sample, we used the DFAM and QFAM tests implemented in PLINK to examine the family-based association for qualitative traits (ASDs) and quantitative traits (RRB). In addition, for the SSC sample only, we added full scale IQ (FSIQ) into the linear regression model as an additional covariate to examine the effect of FSIQ. The '--mperm 10,000' option was used to generate a single-point p value (EMP1) to correct for non-normal trait distributions, and a permutation p value to correct for multiple SNPs/haplotypes (but not multiple phenotypes) in this study. Furthermore, we transformed the mean and standard deviation of RBS-R subscale and sum scores to '0' and '1' to obtain a 'standardized' β (a regression coefficient) allowing β to be comparable across different samples and phenotypes. The criterion for significance was set at a permutation p value of <0.05. We also denoted any finding with a permutation p value of >0.05 but <0.1 as a trend in this report. The IBM® SPSS® Statistics software (version 19; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for descriptive analyses to compare the characteristics across the three samples (UIC versus UF versus SSC), including age, gender, population (white versus non-white), three adaptive behavior domains (communication, daily living, socialization) and composite scores on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale-II (VABS-II) [29], the RBS-R subscales and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) [30] factor scores (Table 1).
Table 1

Descriptive analyses of sample characteristics across the sites of recruitmenta

UIC(n = 88)UF(n = 91)SSC(n = 720)P value (χ2/ANOVA)bPost hoc (Scheffé)
Age in yearsa8.3 ± 4.810.8 ± 3.66.9 ± 2.8< 0.001UF>>c
Gender, M:F75:1375:16620:100NS
Race, white:other57:3168:23583:1370.001
Communication76.2 ± 13.968.0 ± 17.079.4 ± 13.9< 0.001SSC>>d
Daily living75.1 ± 12.571.6 ± 17.978.6 ± 13.8< 0.001SSC>>
Socialization67.5 ± 10.362.4 ± 16.072.7 ± 12.7< 0.001SSC>>
Adaptive behavior composite71.7 ± 11.066.1 ± 14.775.1 ± 11.8< 0.001SSC>>
RBS-R
Stereotyped behavior6.2 ± 4.15.4 ± 3.34.1 ± 3.2< 0.001SSC<<e
Self-injurious behavior3.4 ± 4.84.1 ± 4.52.0 ± 2.8< 0.001SSC<<
Compulsive behavior6.9 ± 5.56.1 ± 5.14.1 ± 3.8< 0.001SSC<<
Ritualistic behavior7.2 ± 5.46.2 ± 4.35.2 ± 3.9< 0.001SSC<<
Sameness behavior11.1 ± 8.010.9 ± 7.17.8 ± 6.0< 0.001SSC<<
Restricted behavior5.6 ± 3.34.8 ± 3.33.6 ± 2.7< 0.001SSC<<
Sum37.4 ± 21.836.5 ± 19.626.9 ± 17.1< 0.001SSC<<
ABC
Irritability16.0 ± 11.116.2 ± 10.210.9 ± 8.5< 0.001SSC<<
Lethargy14.0 ± 9.013.5 ± 8.69.5 ± 6.9< 0.001SSC<<
Stereotypy6.5 ± 4.96.8 ± 5.04.6 ± 4.0< 0.001SSC<<
Hyperactivity21.0 ± 12.521.2 ± 11.316.0 ± 10.2< 0.001SSC<<
Inappropriate speech4.6 ± 3.44.3 ± 3.13.7 ± 2.9< 0.01SSC<
Sum62.1 ± 32.962.0 ± 28.544.7 ± 24.6< 0.001SSC<<

aData are mean ± SD unless otherwise stated.

bχ2/ANOVA: frequency data (gender, race) were analyzed by χ2 statistics, whereas the remaining scale data were analyzed by ANOVA statistics,

cUF>>: higher mean age in the UF sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or SSC.

dSSC>>: higher mean scores in the SSC sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or UF.

eSSC<<: lower mean scores in the SSC sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or UF.

Descriptive analyses of sample characteristics across the sites of recruitmenta aData are mean ± SD unless otherwise stated. bχ2/ANOVA: frequency data (gender, race) were analyzed by χ2 statistics, whereas the remaining scale data were analyzed by ANOVA statistics, cUF>>: higher mean age in the UF sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or SSC. dSSC>>: higher mean scores in the SSC sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or UF. eSSC<<: lower mean scores in the SSC sample compared with those of UIC-ACE or UF. The effect of each individual covariate on RBS-R was examined using linear regression analyses in PLINK, while controlling for the effects of the other covariates and tested SNPs. The significance was set at an uncorrected p value of <0.05. The mean RBS-R subscale and sum scores for individual genotypes of the three SNPs were calculated using the PLINK option of '--qt-mean' (Table 2). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and Mendelian errors were examined using the PLINK options of '--hwe' and '--me'. Quanto software (version 1.1; University of Southern California, CA, USA; quanto@icarus2.usc.edu) was used for a power calculation assuming an additive mode of inheritance and type 1 error rate of 0.05 [31].
Table 2

The individual SNP genotypes versus RBS-R subscale and sum mean scores

UIC-UF sample (n = 179 probands)
SNPrs2056202rs2056202rs2056202rs908670rs908670rs908670rs2292813rs2292813rs2292813

GenotypeaA/AA/GG/GG/GG/AA/AA/AA/GG/G

Nb666106157686352124

Stereotyped behavior5.5 ± 3.46.6 ± 45.3 ± 3.57.1 ± 4.65.5 ± 3.75.8 ± 3.64.3 ± 3.26.9 ± 3.95.4 ± 3.6
Self-injurious behavior2.2 ± 1.94.8 ± 5.63.1 ± 3.94.2 ± 6.43.1 ± 4.24.3 ± 4.82.3 ± 1.55.1 ± 5.73.2 ± 4.2
Compulsive behavior6.5 ± 6.26.7 ± 5.36.4 ± 5.39.5 ± 7.96 ± 4.76.2 ± 54.3 ± 47.4 ± 5.66.1 ± 5.2
Ritualistic behavior4.8 ± 3.78.3 ± 5.5c5.9 ± 4.26.1 ± 4.86.4 ± 4.87 ± 53.3 ± 3.58.8 ± 5.3d5.9 ± 4.4
Sameness behavior10.2 ± 8.312.9 ± 8.69.9 ± 6.610.5 ± 7.510.4 ± 7.111.5 ± 7.810 ± 11.413.8 ± 8.7d9.9 ± 6.7
Restricted behavior3.7 ± 3.65.8 ± 3.44.9 ± 3.15.1 ± 3.65.1 ± 3.55.4 ± 3.13.3 ± 3.26.3 ± 3.44.8 ± 3.2
Sum32.8 ± 21.945.8 ± 26.535.4 ± 19.642.6 ± 24.536 ± 21.841.2 ± 23.227.7 ± 22.748.5 ± 26d35.5 ± 20.2

SSC sample (n = 720 probands)

SNPrs2056202rs2056202rs2056202rs908670rs908670rs908670rs2292813rs2292813rs2292813

GenotypeaA/AA/GG/GG/GG/AA/AA/AA/GG/G

Nb211765236728436710127583

Stereotyped behavior6 ± 3.6d4.4 ± 3.24 ± 3.13.3 ± 2.84.1 ± 34.4 ± 3.3d5.6 ± 3.84.2 ± 2.94.1 ± 3.2
Self-injurious behavior3.8 ± 4.5d2.1 ± 2.91.9 ± 2.61.4 ± 21.8 ± 2.42.3 ± 3.1d2.8 ± 32 ± 2.62 ± 2.8
Compulsive behavior5.5 ± 4.84.3 ± 3.94 ± 3.73.3 ± 34.1 ± 44.3 ± 3.85.7 ± 5.13.9 ± 3.64.1 ± 3.8
Ritualistic behavior6.4 ± 4.95.6 ± 45.1 ± 3.84.8 ± 3.75.3 ± 3.75.3 ± 46.1 ± 5.55.4 ± 3.85.2 ± 3.8
Sameness behavior10.1 ± 7.5d8.6 ± 6.27.5 ± 5.96.9 ± 5.87.9 ± 6.18 ± 6.110 ± 8.78.5 ± 6.17.6 ± 6
Restricted behavior5.2 ± 3.1d3.9 ± 3.13.4 ± 2.62.9 ± 2.53.6 ± 2.73.6 ± 2.86 ± 2.4c3.8 ± 3.13.5 ± 2.6
Sum35.5 ± 21.7d28.8 ± 18.225.9 ± 16.322.7 ± 14.926.9 ± 16.527.8 ± 17.836.2 ± 21.227.4 ± 1726.6 ± 17

aThe SNP genotypes are based on positive strand.

bTotal number of probands with genotype data available.

Permutation p values: cp < 0.1; dp < 0.05.

The individual SNP genotypes versus RBS-R subscale and sum mean scores aThe SNP genotypes are based on positive strand. bTotal number of probands with genotype data available. Permutation p values: cp < 0.1; dp < 0.05.

Post hoc analyses

We also conducted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to examine the four ADI-R scores highlighted in the Silverman study [20] (i.e., age at phrase speech, overall level of language, circumscribed interests, and routines and rituals) by rs2056202 and rs2292813 genotype groups in both the UIC (n = 88 probands) and SSC (n = 720 probands) samples, using the General Linear Model, as implemented in the IBM® SPSS® Statistics software, with gender and age treated as covariates. These analyses were performed mainly because the direction of associated alleles in our study differed from the Silverman study [20]. Because the 'age at phrase speech' item included non-scale codes (e.g., 994, 996 and 997), we treated these codes as 'missing'. The numbers of non-scale codes were 16 in the UIC sample and 50 in the SSC sample. The three genotype groups were reduced to two (A/+ versus G/G) due to the low frequency of the A/A genotype.

Results

There were seven missing SNP genotypes [UIC-UF sample: rs2056202 (n = 1), rs908670 (n = 2) and rs2292813 (n = 0); SCC sample: rs2056202 (n = 1), rs2292813 (n = 1) and rs908670 (n = 2)]. The linkage disequilibrium (R2) was 0.07 between rs2056202 and rs908670, 0.70 between rs2056202 and rs2292813 and 0.05 between rs908670 and rs2292813. The minor allele frequencies (MAF) were 0.22 (UIC-UF) and 0.15 (SSC) for the A allele of rs2056202, 0.30 (UIC-UF) and 0.29 (SSC) for the G allele of rs908670, and 0.16 (UIC-UF) and 0.10 (SSC) for the A allele of rs2292813. The range of allele frequencies of the A alleles of rs2056202 and rs2292813 have been reported to be 0.09 to 0.20 in previous studies [13,14,16,18,20]. The distributions of the genotypes were consistent with HWE, and the SSC family data were free of Mendelian errors. Descriptive analyses of sample characteristics (Table 1) showed that the levels of adaptive behaviors were much higher in the SSC sample, followed by the UIC and UF samples. In addition, the SSC participants had lower levels of maladaptive behaviors measured on the RBS-R and ABC, whereas there were no significant differences in the mean scores of RBS-R and ABC between the UIC and UF samples. Interestingly, the mean scores of the RBS-R appeared to be related to the individual SNP genotypes (Table 2); for instance, subjects with A/G genotypes rs2056202 and rs2292813 had higher RBS-R scores than those with A/A or G/G genotypes in the UIC-UF sample. However, there were too few subjects with A/A genotypes of rs2056202 or rs2292813 for a valid interpretation. In the SSC sample, a trend toward reduction in RBS-R subscale and sum scores was seen across three genotype groups (A/A > A/G > G/G). The linear regression analyses for individual SNPs revealed significant positive associations between the A allele of rs2292813 and three RBS-R scores (ritualistic, sameness, sum; permutation p = 0.017, 0.018, 0.034, respectively) in the UIC-UF sample. The SSC sample had significant positive associations between the A allele of rs2056202 and four RBS-R scores (stereotyped, sameness, restricted, sum; permutation p = 0.026, 0.021, 0.016, 0.027, respectively) and significant positive associations between the A allele of rs908670 and two RBS-R subscales (stereotyped, self-injurious; permutation p = 0.040, 0.009, respectively) (Table 3). For the SSC sample only, FSIQ was added into the linear regression model as a covariate along with age, gender and population (Table 4); the association results remained similar to the results shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Linear regression analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs after controlling for age, gender and population

SampleUIC-UF sample (n = 179 probands)SSC sample (n = 720 probands)
SNPrs2056202 (na = 178)rs908670 (n = 177)rs2292813 (n = 179)rs2056202 (n = 720)rs908670 (n = 718)rs2292813 (n = 720)

Risk allele (frequency)A (0.219)G (0.299)A (0.162)A (0.151)G (0.291)A (0.102)

Stereotyped behavior

βb0.2010.1260.2620.187-0.1380.055
Statc1.5011.0751.7752.591-2.4400.639
EMP1d0.1380.2870.0770.0080.0150.524
Permutation p0.3030.5630.1780.026e0.040e0.851

Self-injurious behavior

βb0.196-0.0720.2760.164-0.1680.009
Statc1.413-0.5911.8072.258-2.9660.110
EMP1d0.1620.5520.0690.0260.0030.910
Permutation p0.3510.8700.1680.059f0.009e0.999

Compulsive behavior

βb0.0240.1990.1380.123-0.0930.004
Statc0.1741.6670.9011.669-1.6210.049
EMP1d0.8650.0970.3750.0970.1100.960
Permutation p0.9960.2270.6920.2240.2471.000

Ritualistic behavior

βb0.298-0.0960.4140.120-0.0290.043
Statc2.173-0.7972.7611.652-0.5110.502
EMP1d0.0290.4200.0070.0990.6170.621
Permutation p0.073f0.7470.017e0.2330.9150.919

Sameness behavior

βb0.284-0.0810.4200.194-0.0620.156
Statc2.036-0.6782.7572.679-1.0871.820
EMP1d0.0390.4970.0060.0080.2810.069
Permutation p0.1030.8270.018e0.021e0.5560.169

Restricted behavior

βb0.096-0.0470.2790.203-0.0680.166
Statc0.703-0.3911.8402.823-1.2081.952
EMP1d0.4800.6910.0700.0060.2300.054
Permutation p0.8070.9530.1600.016e0.4750.127

Sum

βb0.260-0.0460.3900.188-0.1100.085
Statc1.848-0.3792.5482.553-1.9170.977
EMP1d0.0660.7010.0120.0100.0520.331
Permutation p0.1630.9610.034e0.027e0.1310.627

aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available.

bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation).

cCoefficient t-statistics.

dUncorrected single-point p value.

Permutation p value: ep < 0.05; fp < 0.1.

Table 4

Linear regression analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs after controlling for age, gender, population and FSIQ in the SSC sample

SampleSSC sample (n = 720 probands)
SNPrs2056202 (na = 714)rs908670 (n = 712)rs2292813 (n = 714)

Risk allele (frequency)A (0.151)G (0.291)A (0.102)

Stereotyped behavior

βb0.655-0.4440.211
Statc2.883-2.4990.783
EMP1d0.0050.0120.441
Permutation p0.012e0.033e0.763

Self-injurious behavior

βb0.484-0.4680.044
Statc2.408-2.9900.183
EMP1d0.0160.0030.857
Permutation p0.044e0.008e0.995

Compulsive behavior

βb0.531-0.3560.055
Statc1.915-1.6510.169
EMP1d0.0570.0960.872
Permutation P0.1320.2300.996

Ritualistic behavior

βb0.491-0.1140.183
Statc1.749-0.5190.551
EMP1d0.0770.6060.573
Permutation p0.1860.9040.889

Sameness behavior

βb1.222-0.3770.975
Statc2.797-1.0951.880
EMP1d0.0050.2800.061
Permutation p0.014e0.5480.151

Restricted behavior

βb0.579-0.1880.469
Statc2.953-1.2232.019
EMP1d0.0030.2200.042
Permutation p0.008e0.4620.107

Sum

βb3.485-1.8891.615
Statc2.784-1.9371.096
EMP1d0.0050.0570.276
Permutation p0.015e0.1350.546

aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available.

bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation).

cCoefficient t-statistics.

dUncorrected single-point p value.

Permutation p value: eP< 0.05.

Linear regression analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs after controlling for age, gender and population aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available. bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation). cCoefficient t-statistics. dUncorrected single-point p value. Permutation p value: ep < 0.05; fp < 0.1. Linear regression analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs after controlling for age, gender, population and FSIQ in the SSC sample aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available. bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation). cCoefficient t-statistics. dUncorrected single-point p value. Permutation p value: eP< 0.05. The haplotype analyses were conducted for the previously identified haplotype (rs2056202-rs2292813) (Table 5). In the UIC-UF sample, the haplotype omnibus test revealed significant associations with three RBS-R scores (ritualistic, sameness, sum; permutation p = 0.028, 0.025, 0.040, respectively). Individual haplotype analyses were consistent with the omnibus test, with positive correlations between the A-A haplotype and three RBS-R scores (ritualistic, sameness, sum; permutation p = 0.020, 0.017, 0.029, respectively), and a trend toward negative correlations between the G-G haplotype and ritualistic behavior (permutation p = 0.078). In the SSC sample, the haplotype omnibus test showed significant associations with six RBS-R scores (stereotyped, self-injurious, ritualistic, sameness, restricted, sum; permutation p = 0.002, 0.003, 0.021, 0.028, 0.019, 0.009, respectively). Individual haplotype analyses revealed positive correlations between the A-G haplotype and four RBS-R scores (stereotyped, self-injurious, compulsive, sum; permutation p = 0.002, 0.002, 0.020, 0.012, respectively) and negative associations between the G-G haplotype and four RBS-R scores (stereotyped, sameness, restricted, sum; permutation p = 0.022, 0.023, 0.014, 0.031, respectively). As a comparison, three-SNP-haplotype analyses (rs2056202-rs908670-rs2292813) were also conducted (Table 6), which showed similar trends to those from the two-SNP-haplotype analyses shown in Table 5.
Table 5

Haplotype analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and rs2056202-rs2292813 haplotype

UIC-UF sample (n = 179 probands)SSC sample (n = 720 probands)
Haplotype (frequency)A-A (0.163)A-G (0.056)G-G (0.781)OmnibusA-A (0.107)A-G (0.045)G-G (0.849)Omnibus

Stereotyped behavior

βa0.271-0.062-0.201N/A0.0540.408-0.186N/A
Statb3.4000.0782.2503.3800.39411.7006.65012.500
EMP1c0.0620.7870.1340.1840.5310.0000.0090.002
Permutation p0.1460.9550.2850.1840.8020.002d0.022d0.002d

Self-injurious behavior

βa0.285-0.102-0.196N/A0.0100.431-0.165N/A
Statb3.5000.2032.0003.5000.01413.0005.14013.100
EMP1c0.0640.6440.1550.1730.9140.0010.0220.003
Permutation p0.1390.8870.3190.1730.9930.002d0.054e0.003d

Compulsive behavior

βa0.132-0.222-0.024N/A0.0050.324-0.123N/A
Statb0.7340.9620.0301.4400.0037.2202.8107.300
EMP1c0.3890.3290.8600.4870.9570.0070.0950.021
Permutation p0.6590.5810.9830.4870.9980.020d0.2090.021d

Ritualistic behavior

βa0.406-0.096-0.298N/A0.0420.242-0.119N/A
Statb7.3400.1814.7207.3000.2374.0802.6804.500
EMP1c0.0070.6660.0320.0280.6260.0430.1040.110
Permutation p0.020d0.9030.078e0.028d0.8780.1040.2220.110

Sameness behavior

βa0.420-0.156-0.284N/A0.1550.223-0.193N/A
Statb7.5500.4654.1407.5503.2703.4707.1007.350
EMP1c0.0080.5100.0430.0250.0730.0650.0100.028
Permutation p0.017d0.7800.1030.025d0.1640.1480.023d0.028d

Restricted behavior

βa0.293-0.383-0.096N/A0.1660.228-0.202N/A
Statb3.8403.0000.4935.8403.7903.6807.9308.160
EMP1c0.0490.0880.4820.0540.0530.0560.0060.019
Permutation p0.1180.1940.7590.054e0.1210.1280.014d0.019d

Sum

βa0.392-0.171-0.260N/A0.0840.349-0.188N/A
Statb6.5300.5413.4106.5800.9418.1306.4709.630
EMP1c0.0110.4650.0690.0400.3250.0060.0120.009
Permutation p0.029d0.7350.1540.040d0.5770.012d0.031d0.009d

aStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation).

bWald test was used to compare tested haplotype with the remaining haplotypes.

cUncorrected single-point P value.

Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1. N/A: not applicable

Table 6

Haplotype analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and rs2056202-rs908670-rs2292813 haplotype

UIC-UF sample (n = 179 probands)SSC sample (n = 720 probands)
Haplotype (frequency)ATA (0.162)GCG (0.299)ATG (0.056)GTG (0.483)OmnibusATA (0.107)GCG (0.281)ATG (0.045)GTG (0.568)Omnibus

Stereotyped behavior

βb0.2610.126-0.061-0.212N/A0.171-0.4411.3000.064N/A
Statc3.1501.1600.0754.3005.4700.3946.01011.7000.15416.100
EMP1d0.0780.2710.7820.0360.1380.5240.0130.0010.7000.001
Permutation p0.2360.6560.9910.1300.1380.9070.049d0.003d0.9720.001d

Self-injurious behavior

βb0.276-0.069-0.102-0.058N/A0.028-0.4641.1900.151N/A
Statc3.2600.3270.2010.2853.2900.0148.73013.0001.12019.600
EMP1d0.0760.5610.6490.5960.3510.9070.0050.0010.2890.001
Permutation p0.2280.9270.9640.9410.3510.9990.015d0.002d0.6650.001d

Compulsive behavior

βb0.1380.200-0.222-0.175N/A0.016-0.3521.2300.058N/A
Statc0.8112.7600.9632.7004.6400.0022.6407.2200.0878.940
EMP1d0.3620.0990.3280.1030.2020.9590.0990.0070.7650.030
Permutation p0.7720.3000.7260.3100.2021.0000.3070.026d0.9890.030d

Ritualistic behavior

βb0.414-0.095-0.096-0.105N/A0.167-0.1140.936-0.139N/A
Statc7.6200.6270.1810.9747.5900.2520.2694.1100.4894.560
EMP1d0.0060.4270.6750.3240.0540.6190.5990.0460.4890.211
Permutation p0.024d0.8360.9690.7190.054e0.9520.9470.1420.8790.211

Sameness behavior

βb0.420-0.080-0.156-0.105N/A0.945-0.3781.350-0.280N/A
Statc7.6000.4360.4680.9427.5703.3101.2003.4900.8107.630
EMP1d0.0070.5130.5020.3360.0600.0710.2630.0590.3680.056
Permutation p0.027d0.8990.8900.7360.060e0.2120.6450.1920.7690.056e

Restricted behavior

βb0.279-0.046-0.383-0.015N/A0.454-0.1860.624-0.125N/A
Statc3.3800.1432.9200.0195.4303.8101.4603.7000.8018.470
EMP1d0.0660.7050.0850.8930.1470.0510.2250.0550.3680.038
Permutation p0.2130.9770.2700.9990.1470.1640.5630.1760.7700.038d

Sum

βb0.389-0.045-0.171-0.118N/A1.450-1.8905.960-0.046N/A
Statc6.4900.1370.5431.1706.5200.9553.7008.1500.00311.500
EMP1d0.0120.7060.4570.2760.0940.3290.0560.0060.9590.009
Permutation p0.044d0.9810.8610.6560.094e0.7230.1750.019d1.0000.009d

aStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation).

bWald test was used to compare tested haplotype with the remaining haplotypes.

cUncorrected single-point P value.

Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1. N/A: not applicable.

Haplotype analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and rs2056202-rs2292813 haplotype aStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation). bWald test was used to compare tested haplotype with the remaining haplotypes. cUncorrected single-point P value. Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1. N/A: not applicable Haplotype analyses for association between quantitative RRB traits and rs2056202-rs908670-rs2292813 haplotype aStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation). bWald test was used to compare tested haplotype with the remaining haplotypes. cUncorrected single-point P value. Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1. N/A: not applicable. We also examined transmission disequilibrium (TD) of the three SLC25A12 SNPs in the SSC sample using the DFAM test as implemented in PLINK, because previous studies [11-14] suggested overtransmission of the G allele(s) of rs2056202 and/or rs2292813; however, we did not find any evidence of overtransmission of either allele (Table 7). In previous studies [11-14], the transmission rates of the G alleles of rs2056202 and rs2292813 were estimated at approximately 59 to 65% for rs2056202 and 57 to 65% for rs2292813. We examined if the SSC sample had enough power to detect TD, assuming an additive model for a qualitative trait and type 1 error rate of 0.05, using Quanto software. The SSC sample (720 trios) had 80% power to detect a locus with a relative risk of 1.4, which roughly translates to a transmission rate of 58%. Hence, the SSC sample had adequate power to detect an effect size similar to that detected in previous studies. On the other hand, the QFAM test for the quantitative RRB traits revealed positive associations between the A alleles of all three SNPs and the RBS-R scores (Table 8), which was consistent with linear regression analyses results.
Table 7

DFAM analyses for family-based association tests for ASD and SLC25A12 SNPs in the SSC sample (n = 720 trio families)

SNPA1aA2bObscExpdχ2P
rs2056202AG19019001
rs908670GA3523371.5310.216
rs2292813AG134140.50.6190.431

aMinor allele.

bMajor allele.

cObserved frequency.

dExpected frequency.

Table 8

QFAM analyses for family-based association tests for quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs in the SSC sample (n = 720 trio families)

rs2056202 (na = 720)rs908670 (n = 718)rs2292813 (n = 720)
Risk allele (frequency)A (0.152)G (0.281)A (0.107)

Stereotyped behavior

βb0.208-0.1400.087
EMP1c0.0040.0140.309
Permutation p0.004d0.014d0.316

Self-injurious behavior

βb0.186-0.1710.029
EMP1c0.0100.0030.738
Permutation p0.016d0.001d0.742

Compulsive behavior

βb0.131-0.0950.012
EMP1c0.0700.0980.885
Permutation p0.072e0.083e0.883

Ritualistic behavior

βb0.141-0.0360.063
EMP1c0.0490.5320.461
Permutation p0.053e0.5340.471

Sameness behavior

βb0.197-0.0640.154
EMP1c0.0060.2650.073
Permutation p0.008d0.2700.078e

Restricted behavior

βb0.233-0.0780.200
EMP1c0.0010.1720.019
Permutation p0.001d0.1620.020d

Sum

βb0.211-0.1150.105
EMP1c0.0040.0460.224
Permutation p0.005d0.047d0.220

aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available.

bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation).

cUncorrected single-point P value.

Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1.

DFAM analyses for family-based association tests for ASD and SLC25A12 SNPs in the SSC sample (n = 720 trio families) aMinor allele. bMajor allele. cObserved frequency. dExpected frequency. QFAM analyses for family-based association tests for quantitative RRB traits and SLC25A12 SNPs in the SSC sample (n = 720 trio families) aNumber of subjects with non-missing genotype data available. bStandardized regression coefficient (negative value indicates negative correlation). cUncorrected single-point P value. Permutation p value: dp < 0.05; ep < 0.1. Table 9 shows our post hoc analyses, the attempted replication of the Silverman study [20] for the examination of four ADI-R scores by rs2056202 and rs2292813 genotype groups in the samples from UIC (n = 88 probands) and SSC (n = 720 probands). The results from the Silverman study are included in the table for a comparison. Neither UIC nor SSC sample replicated the findings of the Silverman study; however, the SSC sample showed a trend toward more severe 'overall level of language' score (p < 0.05) in the G/G genotype groups of both rs2056202 and rs2292813. We estimated that the Silverman study had a standardized β of 0.42 for 'routines and rituals' and rs2056202 (adjusted mean difference of 0.51 and standard deviation of 1.2). We calculated our study power to see whether our samples had an adequate power to replicate Silverman's finding, using Quanto with an assumption of an additive model of a quantitative locus and type 1 error rate of 0.05. We estimated that the UIC-UF sample could detect a standardized β of 0.43 (R2 = 0.05) and the SSC sample a standardized β of 0.19 (R2 = 0.01), thus, we did have adequate power to replicate Silverman's study.
Table 9

Four ADI-R Trait scores highlighted by Silverman [20], grouped by the presence or absence of at least one A allele for rs2056202 and rs2292813.a,b

Age at phrase speechc, monthsLevel of languageCircumscribed interestsRoutines and rituals
UIC sample (n = 88 probands)

rs2056202

1+A allele (n = 50)40.0 ± 3.30.28 ± 0.091.80 ± 0.231.44 ± 0.25
G/G (n = 120)40.5 ± 2.40.21 ± 0.071.72 ± 0.181.81 ± 0.20
StatisticsF(1,70) = 0.02, p = 0.903F(1,86) = 0.38, p = 0.542F(1,86) = 0.08, p = 0.783F(1,86) = 1.36, p = 0.248

rs2292813

1+A allele (n = 50)39.2 ± 3.70.27 ± 0.111.72 ± 0.261.44 ± 0.29
G/G (n = 120)40.8 ± 2.30.23 ± 0.071.76 ± 0.161.76 ± 0.18
StatisticsF(1,70) = 0.17, p = 0.679F(1,86) = 0.10, p = 0.753F(1,86) = 0.02, P = 0.883F(1,86) = 0.91, p = 0.344

SSC sample (n = 720 probands)

rs2056202

1+A allele (n = 50)37.5 ± 1.40.03 ± 0.021.84 ± 0.081.68 ± 0.10
G/G (n = 120)38.3 ± 0.90.10 ± 0.011.87 ± 0.051.63 ± 0.06
StatisticsF(1,668) = 0.29, p = 0.590F(1,718) = 6.71, p = 0.010eF(1,718) = 0.12, p = 0.735F(1,718) = 0.15, p = 0.701

rs2292813

1+A allele (n = 50)38.0 ± 1.70.03 ± 0.031.71 ± 0.101.67 ± 0.12
G/G (n = 120)38.1 ± 0.80.09 ± 0.011.90 ± 0.051.64 ± 0.06
StatisticsF(1,668) = 0.01, p = 0.943F(1,718) = 4.42, p = 0.036eF(1,718) = 2.97, p = 0.085fF(1,718) = 0.06, p = 0.812

Silverman studyd (n = 170 probands)

rs2056202

1+A allele (n = 50)45 ± 20.90 ± 0.121.31 ± 0.110.79 ± 0.17
G/G (n = 120)44 ± 40.63 ± 0.081.54 ± 1.211.30 ± 0.11
StatisticsF(1,166) = 0.05, p = 0.83F(1,166) = 3.25, p = 0.07fF(1,166) = 1.36, p = 0.25F(1,166) = 6.49, p = 0.0117e

aGender and age were used as covariates and estimated marginal means ± standard errorsE are reported.

bAll p values are uncorrected for multiple comparisons.

c993-999 codes were treated as missing for Age at phrase speech.

dSilverman (2008) study data are shown for comparison.

P value: ep< 0.05; fp< 0.1.

Four ADI-R Trait scores highlighted by Silverman [20], grouped by the presence or absence of at least one A allele for rs2056202 and rs2292813.a,b aGender and age were used as covariates and estimated marginal means ± standard errorsE are reported. bAll p values are uncorrected for multiple comparisons. c993-999 codes were treated as missing for Age at phrase speech. dSilverman (2008) study data are shown for comparison. P value: ep< 0.05; fp< 0.1. Analyses of the effect of an individual covariate on the RBS-R revealed negative correlations between age and stereotyped behavior (β = -0.004 to -0.005; p < 0.005 to 0.0001), and between female gender and restricted behavior (β = -0.228 to -0.242; p < 0.05). In addition, positive correlations were shown between age and sameness behavior (β = 0.002; p < 0.01), between female gender and self-injurious behavior (β = 0.217; p < 0.05), and between population other than white, and self-injurious, ritualistic, and restricted behaviors (β = -0.188 to 0.329; p < 0.05 to 0.005). Additionally, we found that FSIQ was a significant covariate for several RBS-R subscale scores in the SSC sample, which included stereotyped behavior (p = 0.00001 to 0.00003), self-injurious behavior (p = 0.019 to 0.027), compulsive behavior (p = 0.0002 to 0.0004) and RBS-R sum score (p = 0.0009 to 0.0017).

Discussion

SCL25A12 was implicated in ASD through a linkage-directed association study [12] and more than one independent replication association study [11,13,14], support from a recent GWAS [15], and its role in central nervous system development [32-35]. However, not all association studies between SLC25A12 and ASDs have been positive [17-19], indicating the need for further investigation of the basis of this inconsistency. In the present study, we examined SLC25A12 as a quantitative trait locus for RRB in people with ASDs, based on a positive correlation between the G allele of rs2056202 and an ADI-R 'routines and rituals' subdomain score [20]. We initially found evidence for positive associations between the A allele of rs2292813 and RBS-R scores (ritualistic, sameness, sum) and between the A-A haplotype of rs2056202-rs2292813 and the same RBS-R scores in our UIC-UF sample. Although our finding of association between SLC25A12 and quantitative RRB traits (ritualistic, sameness behaviors) in the UIC-UF sample appeared to be comparable with the previous association finding [20], the direction of the associated allele was different (the A alleles of rs2056202 and rs2292813 in our samples versus the G allele of rs2056202 in the Silverman study). This 'flip-flop' phenomenon brought up an important question about whether this study provides a confirmation of an association between SLC25A12 and RRB versus a false positive finding [36]. To clarify this issue, we examined the association in a much larger sample consisting of 720 trio families available from the SFARI database. Although the significantly associated SNPs-RRB varied between these two samples (i.e., rs2292813 in the UIC-UF sample, rs2056202/rs908670 in the SSC sample), both datasets showed consistently positive associations with the A alleles of rs2056202 and rs2292813, as evidenced by the positive β values in Table 3 and Table 4. The β values for the A-A and the G-G haplotypes were also consistent across the UIC-UF and SSC samples in the haplotype analyses (positive for the A-A haplotype and negative for the G-G haplotype in Table 5). The A-G haplotype was somewhat puzzling initially, as the A-G haplotype was found to have a negative β in the UIC-UF sample but a positive β in the SSC sample. Interestingly, in the UIC-UF sample, the positively associated 'A' allele of rs2292813 was present only on the A-A haplotype, whereas the negatively associated 'G' allele of rs2292813 was present on both A-G and G-G haplotypes, creating a negative β value for the A-G haplotype. In the SSC sample, by contrast, the more positively associated A allele of rs2056202 was present on the A-A haplotype about 70% of the time, and on the A-G haplotype about 30% of the time, creating a positive β value for the A-G haplotype. Therefore, the individual haplotype associations were consistent with the allelic associations; that is, positive association with the A allele of rs2292813 in the UIC-UF sample, and positive association with the A allele of rs2056202 in the SSC sample. In addition, the significantly associated SNPs and phenotypes may vary between datasets even in a true association [37]. For example, varying patterns of LD across samples could lead to the susceptibility variant to be associated with different variants in different samples. Taken together, these results argue against the probability of a false positive in these (UIC-UF and SSC) samples, despite the direction of the association being different from the Silverman study. In this study, we also attempted to replicate the Silverman study directly, using the UIC and SSC samples, because it was not clear whether differences in the phenotype used (RBS-R in our study versus ADI-R in the Silverman study) or in the analytic methods (linear regression in our study versus ANCOVA in the Silverman study) might be contributing to the opposite direction of associated allele. Even with the same phenotypes and comparable analytic methods used; however, our samples did not replicate the Silverman findings. This suggests that genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of ASD samples may at least partly account for the differences across the studies. For instance, we estimated that 51% of the A/+ group, 57% of the G/G group and 55% of the entire Silverman sample had an overall level of language score of 0. These numbers contrast with 82% of the UIC group and 93% of the SSC group having a score of 0 in the overall level of language. In addition, 'overall level of language' would have affected the ADI-R score of 'verbal rituals' and the subdomain score of 'routines and rituals,' which may have influenced the association findings. Furthermore, it is possible that we overestimated our study power based on an estimate of effect size from the Silverman study. This is often referred as 'winner's curse' when the true effect size may have been much smaller than an estimate from the primary study [38]. Another point to consider is that the ADI-R is not as quantitative as the RBS-R. Therefore, scores may have not provided sufficient variability to observe the same association. Several family-based association studies previously identified the G alleles of rs2056202 or rs2292813 as risk alleles for autism [11-14]. Although it sounds confusing, these results should not be confused with our study result (the A alleles of rs2056202 or rs2292813 associated with RRB), because our study did not examine associations with autism, but with RRB. Although not straightforward, the association is not expected to be the same even if they seem to be related (i.e., RRB and autism), when it is not the same phenotype. In other words, there is variability of RRB in subjects diagnosed with ASDs. If there were not, then it would not be possible to detect an association with degree of RRB within an autism sample. If an allele is associated with increasing RRB within an autism sample, then whether that allele will show an association with autism depends on the distribution of RRB in the sample. The association with autism may be with the same allele, the opposite allele or neither allele in a sample in which RRB tends to be high, low or mixed within the autism sample, respectively. In this study, we did not find evidence for TD between ASDs and SLC25A12 in the SSC sample. Because the SSC sample was estimated to have adequate power to detect a locus with a relative risk of 1.4, this result further emphasizes the genetic heterogeneity of ASD (making the effect size smaller or non-existent in the SSC sample). Of note, the SSC sample data were contributed from multiple groups in various regions, increasing the genetic heterogeneity even more in this specific sample. In addition, we would need to consider that the true effect size may have been much smaller than 1.4, an estimate from the previous studies. We also confirmed the effect of age on stereotyped behavior (i.e., older subjects with less severe stereotyped behavior), which is consistent with previous studies [39,40]. In addition, we found gender and population effects on the RBS-R subscale scores in the SSC sample. Moreover, we did not find any effect of study site in the UIC-UF sample, which is particularly interesting because the UIC and UF samples are different in terms of recruitment and assessment protocols, geographic locations, and the rate of concurrent psychotropic medications.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed an association between SLC25A12 and RRB. Genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity may account for the flip-flop phenomenon of associated alleles between our study and the Silverman study, and for the absence of association between SLC25A12 and ASDs in the SSC trio sample. In addition, SLC25A12 may not be the risk allele itself but may be in LD with a real risk allele for RRB and/or ASDs. As anticipated based on the replication design, this study did not fully tag the gene, but was designed to replicate previous findings. Therefore, we identified seven tagging SLC25A12 SNPs with pair-wise r2< 80% and MAF>10% from the International Hapmap project (http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Future research efforts should include searching for risk alleles nearby using denser genetic markers including (but not limited to) all tagging SNPs, and dense resequencing of the interval to find genetic variants possibly more directly related to phenotype.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

SJK carried out sample recruitment, phenotypic data collection, data processing, genotyping and data analyses, and drafted the manuscript. RMS participated in the sample processing and genotyping. CGF participated in the sample recruitment and data processing at the UF. SJ participated in the sample recruitment and data processing at the UIC. SG participated in the sample recruitment and phenotypic data collection at the UIC. GV participated in the sample recruitment and phenotypic data collection at the UF. AMZ participated in the biomaterial processing and validation of data entry. EHC conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and helped to draft the manuscript. JAB designed the data analyses plan, supervised statistical analyses and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  36 in total

1.  Autism: searching for coherence.

Authors:  Daniel Geschwind
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Mitochondrial aspartate/glutamate carrier SLC25A12 gene is associated with autism.

Authors:  Joni A Turunen; Karola Rehnström; Helena Kilpinen; Mikko Kuokkanen; Elli Kempas; Tero Ylisaukko-Oja
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Lack of association between autism and SLC25A12.

Authors:  Raquel Rabionet; Jacob L McCauley; James M Jaworski; Allison E Ashley-Koch; Eden R Martin; James S Sutcliffe; Jonathan L Haines; G Robert DeLong; Ruth K Abramson; Harry H Wright; Michael L Cuccaro; John R Gilbert; Margaret A Pericak-Vance
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Latent-class analysis of recurrence risks for complex phenotypes with selection and measurement error: a twin and family history study of autism.

Authors:  A Pickles; P Bolton; H Macdonald; A Bailey; A Le Couteur; C H Sim; M Rutter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Diagnostic uses of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales.

Authors:  S S Sparrow; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  1985-06

6.  The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism.

Authors:  C Lord; S Risi; L Lambrecht; E H Cook; B L Leventhal; P C DiLavore; A Pickles; M Rutter
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2000-06

Review 7.  Autism as a paradigmatic complex genetic disorder.

Authors:  Jeremy Veenstra-Vanderweele; Susan L Christian; Edwin H Cook
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

8.  Slc25a12 disruption alters myelination and neurofilaments: a model for a hypomyelination syndrome and childhood neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Takeshi Sakurai; Nicolas Ramoz; Marta Barreto; Mihaela Gazdoiu; Nagahide Takahashi; Michael Gertner; Nathan Dorr; Miguel A Gama Sosa; Rita De Gasperi; Gissel Perez; James Schmeidler; Vivian Mitropoulou; H Carl Le; Mihaela Lupu; Patrick R Hof; Gregory A Elder; Joseph D Buxbaum
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  AGC1 deficiency associated with global cerebral hypomyelination.

Authors:  Rolf Wibom; Francesco M Lasorsa; Virpi Töhönen; Michela Barbaro; Fredrik H Sterky; Thomas Kucinski; Karin Naess; Monica Jonsson; Ciro L Pierri; Ferdinando Palmieri; Anna Wedell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Early features of autism: Repetitive behaviours in young children.

Authors:  Erin L Mooney; Kylie M Gray; Bruce J Tonge
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.785

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial Aspartate/Glutamate Carrier SLC25A12 and Autism Spectrum Disorder: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuta Aoki; Samuele Cortese
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 2.  The neural circuitry of restricted repetitive behavior: Magnetic resonance imaging in neurodevelopmental disorders and animal models.

Authors:  B J Wilkes; M H Lewis
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  One thing leads to another: the cascade of obligations when researchers report genetic research results to study participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Li Li; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  No association of the norepinephrine transporter gene (SLC6A2) and cognitive and behavioural phenotypes of patients with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Subin Park; Jong-Eun Park; Soo-Churl Cho; Bung-Nyun Kim; Min-Sup Shin; Jae-Won Kim; In Hee Cho; Soon Ae Kim; Mira Park; Tae-Won Park; Jung-Woo Son; Un-Sun Chung; Hee Jeong Yoo
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.270

5.  Genomic selection signatures in autism spectrum disorder identifies cognitive genomic tradeoff and its relevance in paradoxical phenotypes of deficits versus potentialities.

Authors:  Anil Prakash; Moinak Banerjee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Loci nominally associated with autism from genome-wide analysis show enrichment of brain expression quantitative trait loci but not lymphoblastoid cell line expression quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Lea K Davis; Eric R Gamazon; Emily Kistner-Griffin; Judith A Badner; Chunyu Liu; Edwin H Cook; James S Sutcliffe; Nancy J Cox
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 7.509

7.  Single nucleotide polymorphism rs6716901 in SLC25A12 gene is associated with Asperger syndrome.

Authors:  Jaroslava Durdiaková; Varun Warrier; Simon Baron-Cohen; Bhismadev Chakrabarti
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 7.509

Review 8.  Channelopathy pathogenesis in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Galina Schmunk; J Jay Gargus
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Bio-collections in autism research.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Louise Gallagher; June L Chen; Geraldine Leader; Sanbing Shen
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 7.509

Review 10.  Assessment of infantile mineral imbalances in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs).

Authors:  Hiroshi Yasuda; Toyoharu Tsutsui
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.