Literature DB >> 21607630

Impact of primary PCI volume on hospital mortality in STEMI patients: does time-to-presentation matter?

Eliano Pio Navarese1, Stefano De Servi, Alessandro Politi, Alessandro Martinoni, Giuseppe Musumeci, Enrico Boschetti, Guido Belli, Maurizio D'Urbano, Emanuela Piccaluga, Corrado Lettieri, Silvio Klugmann.   

Abstract

The exact relationship between primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) volume and mortality remains unclear. No data are available on how this relationship could be affected by time-to-presentation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of hospital primary PCI volume on in-hospital mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients depending on time-to-presentation. The impact of primary PCI volume on in-hospital mortality was investigated in a prospective registry of the Lombardy region in Northern Italy, deriving data on mortality rates and number of primary PCIs from a cohort of 2,558 patients. We also explored this relationship at different times-to-presentation (≤90 min, >90 min-180 min, >180 min) and risk profiles assessed with the TIMI Risk Index. A strong inverse relationship was found between primary PCI hospital volume and risk-adjusted mortality (r = -0.9; P < 0.001). High primary PCI volumes best predicted the improvement of survival when the time-to-presentation was ≤90 min (area under the curve = 0.73, P < 0.0001). At this time, the best primary PCI threshold to provide benefit was >66 primary PCIs/year (OR = 0.21 [95% CI 0.10-0.47], P < 0.001) and those with high TIMI Risk Index achieved the greatest benefit (P < 0.001). At >90 min-180 min, the model was less significant (P = 0.02) with a higher threshold of procedures (>145 primary PCIs/year) required to provide benefits. The model was not predictive of survival for time-to-presentation >180 min (P = 0.30). The reduction of mortality of STEMI patients treated at high-volume primary PCI centers is time-dependent and affected by risk profile. The greatest benefit was observed in high-risk patients presenting within 90 min from symptoms onset.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21607630     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-011-0598-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  25 in total

1.  Procedure volume as a predictor of surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jing Cao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Predicting in-hospital mortality. A comparison of severity measurement approaches.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; G A Coffman; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Volume-outcome relationships for percutaneous coronary interventions in the stent era.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Chuntao Wu; Gary Walford; Spencer B King; David R Holmes; John A Ambrose; Samin Sharma; Stanley Katz; Luther T Clark; Robert H Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Is the volume-outcome relation still an issue in the era of PCI with systematic stenting? Results of the greater Paris area PCI registry.

Authors:  Christian Spaulding; Marie-Claude Morice; Bernard Lancelin; Simon El Haddad; Eric Lepage; Sophie Bataille; Jean-Pierre Tresca; Xavier Mouranche; Sandrine Fosse; Mehran Monchi; Nikita de Vernejoul
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  The volume of primary angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

Authors:  J G Canto; N R Every; D J Magid; W J Rogers; J A Malmgren; P D Frederick; W J French; A J Tiefenbrunn; V K Misra; C I Kiefe; H V Barron
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Procedure volume and outcome: you should take into account each hospital.

Authors:  Eliano Pio Navarese; Fausto Castriota; Stefano De Servi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Pharmacological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future?

Authors:  Bernard J Gersh; Gregg W Stone; Harvey D White; David R Holmes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Impact of primary coronary angioplasty delay on myocardial salvage, infarct size, and microvascular damage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Marco Francone; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Iacopo Carbone; Emanuele Canali; Raffaele Scardala; Francesca A Calabrese; Gennaro Sardella; Massimo Mancone; Carlo Catalano; Francesco Fedele; Roberto Passariello; Jan Bogaert; Luciano Agati
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Judith A Boura; Cindy L Grines
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Influence of time-to-treatment, TIMI-flow grades, and ST-segment resolution on infarct size and infarct transmurality as assessed by delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Mathias J Kappl; Axel Linke; Sandra Erbs; Enno Boudriot; Alexander Lembcke; Dietmar Kivelitz; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Timely and optimal treatment of patients with STEMI.

Authors:  Jens F Lassen; Hans E Bøtker; Christian J Terkelsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Do acute myocardial infarction and stroke mortality vary by distance to hospitals in Switzerland? Results from the Swiss National Cohort Study.

Authors:  Claudia Berlin; Radoslaw Panczak; Rebecca Hasler; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Population access to reperfusion services for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Kerala, India.

Authors:  Anoop Mathew; Jabir Abdullakutty; Placid Sebastian; Sunitha Viswanathan; Cibu Mathew; Venugopalan Nair; Padinhare P Mohanan; A George Koshy
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  The relationship between procedural volume and patient outcomes for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Harrington; Máirín Ryan; Kieran A Walsh; Thomas Plunkett; Kirsty K O'Brien; Conor Teljeur; Susan M Smith
Journal:  HRB Open Res       Date:  2021-01-28

Review 5.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Xiaojun Lin; Hongbing Tao; Miao Cai; Aihua Liao; Zhaohui Cheng; Haifeng Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.