Literature DB >> 15728169

Pharmacological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future?

Bernard J Gersh1, Gregg W Stone, Harvey D White, David R Holmes.   

Abstract

Current options for reperfusion therapy in patients admitted to a community hospital without cardiac catheterization facilities include administration of fibrinolytic drugs followed by observation, with referral to angiography driven by symptoms and signs of ischemia; transfer to a tertiary care center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); or a strategy of facilitated PCI in which administration of fibrinolytics and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (alone or in combination) is followed by transfer for immediate angiography and PCI if appropriate. We systematically analyzed multiple randomized and nonrandomized trials to review the pathophysiology of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction to derive insights about the likelihood of success of a strategy of facilitated PCI compared with transfer only or fibrinolysis only. The basis for the recommendations made herein is a hypothetical curve relating the duration of symptoms before reperfusion to reduction in mortality and extent of myocardial salvage. During the first 2 to 3 hours after symptom onset, a striking benefit of reperfusion is present; within this period, time to treatment is critical. Subsequently, a mortality benefit is still present but of decreasing magnitude over time. In this situation, the priority is to open the artery, and time to treatment is less critical. Results of facilitated PCI may depend largely on timing of presentation. If presentation is late after symptom onset (ie, on the "flat" part of the curve), there will be little mortality benefit from earlier patency and patients will be subject to the bleeding risks of fibrinolytic drugs. In contrast, among patients presenting very early (60-90 minutes after symptom onset), outcomes with fibrinolytic therapy alone are excellent, and it will be difficult for any other strategy to result in a significant improvement. But in patients presenting 2 to 3 hours after onset of symptoms, a strategy of facilitated PCI may move patients from the plateau to the descending limb of the curve, with a substantial improvement in myocardial salvage and mortality. Two large ongoing trials may provide definitive answers to these issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15728169     DOI: 10.1001/jama.293.8.979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  63 in total

Review 1.  Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.

Authors:  Pravin Pratap; Sameer Gupta; Michael Berlowitz; Michael Berlowtiz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Toward a comprehensive approach to pharmacoinvasive therapy for patients with ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Burton E Sobel
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention: is this strategy ready for implementation?

Authors:  Derek P Chew; Phil Aylward; Harvey D White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Is delayed facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention better than immediate in reperfused myocardial infarction? Six months follow up findings.

Authors:  Pietro Di Pasquale; Sergio Cannizzaro; Gaspare Parrinello; Francesco Giambanco; Giuseppe Vitale; Sergio Fasullo; Sebastiano Scalzo; Filippo Ganci; Nicola La Manna; Filippo Sarullo; Gabriella La Rocca; Salvatore Paterna
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Do we really need another biomarker to diagnose myocardial infarction after coronary artery bypass graft surgery?

Authors:  Jeffrey J Rade; Charles W Hogue
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 6.  Reperfusion options in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays.

Authors:  David M Larson; Timothy D Henry
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Cell therapy for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Yoo-Wook Kwon; Han-Mo Yang; Hyun-Jai Cho
Journal:  Int J Stem Cells       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  Impact of primary PCI volume on hospital mortality in STEMI patients: does time-to-presentation matter?

Authors:  Eliano Pio Navarese; Stefano De Servi; Alessandro Politi; Alessandro Martinoni; Giuseppe Musumeci; Enrico Boschetti; Guido Belli; Maurizio D'Urbano; Emanuela Piccaluga; Corrado Lettieri; Silvio Klugmann
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  One-year mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Vienna STEMI registry.

Authors:  Bernhard Jäger; Serdar Farhan; Karim Kalla; Helmut D Glogar; Günter Christ; Ronald Karnik; Georg Norman; Herbert Prachar; Wolfgang Schreiber; Alfred Kaff; Andrea Podczeck-Schweighofer; Franz Weidinger; Thomas Stefenelli; Georg Delle-Karth; Anton N Laggner; Gerald Maurer; Kurt Huber
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 1.704

10.  Targeting plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in tetracycline-induced pleural injury in rabbits.

Authors:  Galina Florova; Ali O Azghani; Sophia Karandashova; Chris Schaefer; Serge V Yarovoi; Paul J Declerck; Douglas B Cines; Steven Idell; Andrey A Komissarov
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 5.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.