A Pilatz1, B Altinkilic, E Köhler, M Marconi, W Weidner. 1. Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg GmbH-Giessen, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Rudolf-Buchheim-Strasse 7, 35385 Giessen, Germany. adrian.pilatz@chiru.med.uni-giessen.de
Abstract
PURPOSE: Investigating the diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasound for defining the varicocele grade according to WHO criteria. METHODS: A total of 217 men (129 with clinical varicocele and 88 without clinical varicocele) were investigated by physical examination and color Doppler ultrasound and categorized according to WHO varicocele criteria (0, subclinical, I, II, and III). Diameter and reflux of the largest vein in the pampiniform plexus were measured bilaterally with the patient in the supine position in rest and during the Valsalva maneuver. To assess the possibility of differentiating varicocele grade by venous diameter, optimal cut-point values were determined by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: With increased varicocele grade, a larger vein diameter was more significant in rest and during Valsalva (in all cases P < 0.05), except between grade I and grade II. Retrograde peak flow velocities were similar in every group (in all cases P > 0.1). Only grade III varicoceles demonstrated significantly increased peak flow values compared with all other grades (P < 0.001). There were no side-related differences when comparing identical varicocele grades (in all cases P > 0.1). Venous diameters above 2.45 mm in rest (sensitivity 84%, specificity 81%) or 2.95 mm during Valsalva (sensitivity 84%, specificity 84%) predicted the presence of a clinical varicocele. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that clinical varicoceles can be predicted with high accuracy based only on the diameter of testicular veins using cut-point values of >2.45 mm in rest or >2.95 mm during Valsalva maneuver in the supine position.
PURPOSE: Investigating the diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasound for defining the varicocele grade according to WHO criteria. METHODS: A total of 217 men (129 with clinical varicocele and 88 without clinical varicocele) were investigated by physical examination and color Doppler ultrasound and categorized according to WHO varicocele criteria (0, subclinical, I, II, and III). Diameter and reflux of the largest vein in the pampiniform plexus were measured bilaterally with the patient in the supine position in rest and during the Valsalva maneuver. To assess the possibility of differentiating varicocele grade by venous diameter, optimal cut-point values were determined by receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: With increased varicocele grade, a larger vein diameter was more significant in rest and during Valsalva (in all cases P < 0.05), except between grade I and grade II. Retrograde peak flow velocities were similar in every group (in all cases P > 0.1). Only grade III varicoceles demonstrated significantly increased peak flow values compared with all other grades (P < 0.001). There were no side-related differences when comparing identical varicocele grades (in all cases P > 0.1). Venous diameters above 2.45 mm in rest (sensitivity 84%, specificity 81%) or 2.95 mm during Valsalva (sensitivity 84%, specificity 84%) predicted the presence of a clinical varicocele. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the hypothesis that clinical varicoceles can be predicted with high accuracy based only on the diameter of testicular veins using cut-point values of >2.45 mm in rest or >2.95 mm during Valsalva maneuver in the supine position.
Authors: Joel L Marmar; Ashok Agarwal; Sushil Prabakaran; Rishi Agarwal; Robert A Short; Susan Benoff; Anthony J Thomas Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-04-16 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kristin A Kozakowski; Carl K Gjertson; G Joel Decastro; Stephen Poon; Anthony Gasalberti; Kenneth I Glassberg Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-04-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Simon Freeman; Michele Bertolotto; Jonathan Richenberg; Jane Belfield; Vikram Dogra; Dean Y Huang; Francesco Lotti; Karolina Markiet; Olivera Nikolic; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Parvati Ramchandani; Laurence Rocher; Mustafa Secil; Paul S Sidhu; Katarzyna Skrobisz; Michal Studniarek; Athina Tsili; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Pietro Pavlica; Lorenzo E Derchi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: S D'Andrea; A Micillo; A Barbonetti; A V Giordano; S Carducci; A Mancini; S Necozione; F Francavilla; S Francavilla Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 4.256