Literature DB >> 19375756

Peak retrograde flow: a novel predictor of persistent, progressive and new onset asymmetry in adolescent varicocele.

Kristin A Kozakowski1, Carl K Gjertson, G Joel Decastro, Stephen Poon, Anthony Gasalberti, Kenneth I Glassberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The major indication for adolescent left varicocelectomy is testicular asymmetry. However, a period of observation is often recommended preoperatively to determine if the asymmetry resolves, persists or progresses. We investigated whether varicocele grade or the duplex Doppler ultrasound measurements of peak retrograde flow and mean vein diameter could be used as predictors of persistent, progressive or new onset asymmetry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Only patients with left varicoceles who had undergone at least 2 duplex Doppler ultrasounds without intervening surgery were included in the study. Grade of varicocele, peak retrograde flow and mean vein diameter were analyzed as possible determinants of catch-up growth, or persistent or new onset asymmetry.
RESULTS: A total of 77 patients (mean age 14.3 years, range 9 to 20) were identified with a mean observation period of 13.2 months. Of the patients 50 (65%) had 10% or greater asymmetry at the first measurement. Of patients with initial 20% or greater asymmetry 71% had persistent or worsening asymmetry on followup evaluation. All 14 patients with the combination of an initial peak retrograde flow 38 cm per second or greater and 20% or greater asymmetry had progressive asymmetry on followup examination. Peak retrograde flow was the only significant parameter of predictive value for persistent or worsening asymmetry (p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: Peak retrograde flow can serve as a valuable tool in predicting persistent, progressive and new onset asymmetry. Varicoceles associated with a peak retrograde flow of 38 cm per second or greater and 20% or greater asymmetry should be considered for varicocelectomy at initial presentation. Patients with peak retrograde flow greater than 30 cm per second need to be monitored carefully. Those with peak retrograde flow less than 30 cm per second are less likely to require surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19375756     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  The dilemma of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Michael L Garcia-Roig; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Ultrasound evaluation of varicoceles: guidelines and recommendations of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group (ESUR-SPIWG) for detection, classification, and grading.

Authors:  Simon Freeman; Michele Bertolotto; Jonathan Richenberg; Jane Belfield; Vikram Dogra; Dean Y Huang; Francesco Lotti; Karolina Markiet; Olivera Nikolic; Subramaniyan Ramanathan; Parvati Ramchandani; Laurence Rocher; Mustafa Secil; Paul S Sidhu; Katarzyna Skrobisz; Michal Studniarek; Athina Tsili; Ahmet Tuncay Turgut; Pietro Pavlica; Lorenzo E Derchi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Varicoceles in the pediatric population: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas de Los Reyes; Jennifer Locke; Kourosh Afshar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  The Varicocele: Clinical Presentation, Evaluation, and Surgical Management.

Authors:  Jason R Lomboy; Robert M Coward
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Varicocele.

Authors:  Kouroush Afshar; Trustin Domes
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Color Doppler ultrasound imaging in varicoceles: is the venous diameter sufficient for predicting clinical and subclinical varicocele?

Authors:  A Pilatz; B Altinkilic; E Köhler; M Marconi; W Weidner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Ignazio Gattuccio; Marco Pensabene; Maria Sergio; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew R Macey; Ryan C Owen; Sherry S Ross; R Matthew Coward
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-22

9.  Update on the management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Kenneth I Glassberg; Ruslan Korets
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-04-12

Review 10.  Children and adults varicocele: diagnostic issues and therapeutical strategies.

Authors:  Massimo Valentino; Michele Bertolotto; Lorenzo Derchi; Pietro Pavlica
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.