Literature DB >> 21604232

When less is heard than meets the ear: change deafness in a telephone conversation.

Kimberly M Fenn1, Hadas Shintel, Alexandra S Atkins, Jeremy I Skipper, Veronica C Bond, Howard C Nusbaum.   

Abstract

During a conversation, we hear the sound of the talker as well as the intended message. Traditional models of speech perception posit that acoustic details of a talker's voice are not encoded with the message whereas more recent models propose that talker identity is automatically encoded. When shadowing speech, listeners often fail to detect a change in talker identity. The present study was designed to investigate whether talker changes would be detected when listeners are actively engaged in a normal conversation, and visual information about the speaker is absent. Participants were called on the phone, and during the conversation the experimenter was surreptitiously replaced by another talker. Participants rarely noticed the change. However, when explicitly monitoring for a change, detection increased. Voice memory tests suggested that participants remembered only coarse information about both voices, rather than fine details. This suggests that although listeners are capable of change detection, voice information is not continuously monitored at a fine-grain level of acoustic representation during natural conversation and is not automatically encoded. Conversational expectations may shape the way we direct attention to voice characteristics and perceive differences in voice.
© 2011 The Experimental Psychology Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604232     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.570353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  8 in total

1.  Inattentional deafness in music.

Authors:  Sabrina Koreimann; Bartosz Gula; Oliver Vitouch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-03-21

2.  Change detection in complex auditory scenes is predicted by auditory memory, pitch perception, and years of musical training.

Authors:  Christina M Vanden Bosch der Nederlanden; Che'Renee Zaragoza; Angie Rubio-Garcia; Evan Clarkson; Joel S Snyder
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-17

Review 3.  Did you hear that? The role of stimulus similarity and uncertainty in auditory change deafness.

Authors:  Kelly Dickerson; Jeremy R Gaston
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-02

4.  Perceptual Plasticity for Auditory Object Recognition.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-23

5.  Emotionally expressed voices are retained in memory following a single exposure.

Authors:  Yoonji Kim; John J Sidtis; Diana Van Lancker Sidtis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Listener expectations and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability: A pre-registered replication.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; David Saltzman; Emily B Myers; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Talker variability in audio-visual speech perception.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-16

8.  Do we notice when communication goes awry? An investigation of people's sensitivity to coherence in spontaneous conversation.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Gareth Roberts
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.