Literature DB >> 21604210

MRI of the lumbar spine at 7 Tesla in healthy volunteers and a patient with congenital malformations.

Astrid E Grams1, Oliver Kraff, Lale Umutlu, Stefan Maderwald, Philipp Dammann, Mark E Ladd, Michael Forsting, Elke R Gizewski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate sequences that are established at lower magnetic field strengths for lumbar spine imaging at 7 Tesla (7 T) MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The lumbar spine of five healthy volunteers and a patient with spina bifida and meningocele were evaluated at 7 T. The examination included a T2-TSE (turbo spin echo), a 3D-DESS (double-echo steady-state sequence), a 3D-CISS (constructive interference in steady-state sequence), and a 3D-VIBE (volumetric interpolated breath hold examination) sequence. Imaging quality was evaluated by two raters on a three-level scale. The assessment included visualization of intraforaminal structures, the cauda equina, facet joints, and any abnormalities. Contrast ratios for intervertebral discs/vertebral bodies, vertebral bodies/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and CSF/spinal cord were calculated.
RESULTS: The 3D-VIBE sequence provided best differentiation between intraforaminal structures. Visualization of the facet joints was reliable with VIBE, DESS, and CISS. Individual nerve roots of the cauda equina could only be delineated with the 3D-CISS sequence. CISS and DESS provided good contrast between vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs. Contrast between CSF and vertebral bodies was most pronounced for the T2-TSE sequence. Sufficient contrast between CSF and the spinal cord was only achieved with the T2-TSE sequence. VIBE and DESS sequences demonstrated best the bony malformations. Visualization of the meningocele was only possible with the 3D-CISS sequence.
CONCLUSION: At 7 T most structures of the lumbar spine were visualized with a combination of sequences. At present, imaging quality is not superior to 1.5 T or 3 T, precluding routine clinical use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21604210     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-011-1197-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  15 in total

1.  Real-time shimming to compensate for respiration-induced B0 fluctuations.

Authors:  P van Gelderen; J A de Zwart; P Starewicz; R S Hinks; J H Duyn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance imaging applications at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: a comparative study.

Authors:  Gerwin P Schmidt; Bernd Wintersperger; Anno Graser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Subjective and objective image qualities: a comparison of sagittal T2 weighted spin-echo and Turbo-spin-echo sequences in magnetic resonance imaging of the spine by use of a subjective ranking system.

Authors:  G Görres; I Mader; M Proske
Journal:  Rontgenpraxis       Date:  1998

4.  Assessment of the narrow cervical spinal canal: a prospective comparison of MRI, myelography and CT-myelography.

Authors:  J Reul; B Gievers; J Weis; A Thron
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  High-resolution constructive interference in steady-state imaging in tethered cord syndrome: technical note.

Authors:  Steffen K Rosahl; Osama Kassem; Uwe Piepgras; Dieter Hellwig; Madjid Samii
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2005-04

6.  A radiofrequency coil configuration for imaging the human vertebral column at 7 T.

Authors:  M Vossen; W Teeuwisse; M Reijnierse; C M Collins; N B Smith; A G Webb
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; V S Lee; G Laub; M A Pollack; G A Krinsky; D Thomasson; M M Ambrosino; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Whole-body MRI for metastases screening: a preliminary study using 3D VIBE sequences with automatic subtraction between noncontrast and contrast enhanced images.

Authors:  Vivien Thomson; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Frédéric Gay; Agnès Coulon; Alain Voloch; Anne Granier; Jean-Claude Guérin; Magalie Viallon; Yves Berthezene
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.339

9.  An eight-channel phased array RF coil for spine MR imaging at 7 T.

Authors:  Oliver Kraff; Andreas K Bitz; Stefan Kruszona; Stephan Orzada; Lena C Schaefer; Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  The course of the nerve root in the neural foramen and its relationship with foraminal entrapment or impingement in adult patients with lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis and radicular pain.

Authors:  Ki-Won Kim; Jin-Wha Chung; Jong-Beom Park; Seok-Whan Song; Kee-Yong Ha; Howard S An
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-06
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Measuring renal tissue relaxation times at 7 T.

Authors:  Xiufeng Li; Patrick J Bolan; Kamil Ugurbil; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 3.  Spinal cord MRI at 7T.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; S Johanna Vannesjo; Samantha By; John C Gore; Seth A Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Progress in Imaging the Human Torso at the Ultrahigh Fields of 7 and 10.5 T.

Authors:  Kamil Uğurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele; Andrea Grant; Edward J Auerbach; Arcan Ertürk; Russell Lagore; Jutta M Ellermann; Xiaoxuan He; Gregor Adriany; Gregory J Metzger
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.266

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.