Literature DB >> 21603966

Clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 2 years.

R Banu Ermis1, Kirsten L Van Landuyt, Marcio Vivan Cardoso, Jan De Munck, Bart Van Meerbeek, Marleen Peumans.   

Abstract

A 2-year randomized, controlled prospective study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive and a "gold-standard" three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive in non-carious Class-V lesions. The null hypothesis tested was that the one-step self-etch adhesive does perform clinically equally well as the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. A total of 161 lesions in 26 patients were restored with Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray). The restorations were bonded either with the "all-in-one" adhesive Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray) or with the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL (Kerr). The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months, 1 and 2 years, regarding their retention, marginal adapation, marginal discoloration, caries occurrence, preservation of tooth vitality and post-operative sensivity. Retention loss, severe marginal defects and/or discoloration that needed intervention (repair or replacement) and the occurrence of caries were considered as clinical failures. The recall rate at 2 years was 93.8%. Only one Clearfil S3 Bond restoration was lost at the 2-year recall. All other restorations were clinically acceptable. The number of restorations with defect-free margins decreased severely during the 2-year study period (to 6.7% and 25.3% for Clearfil S3 Bond and Optibond FL, respectively). The Clearfil S3 Bond restorations presented significantly more small marginal defects at the enamel side than the Optibond FL restorations (Clearfil S3 Bond: 93.3%; Optibond FL: 73.3%; p = 0.000). Superficial marginal discoloration increased in both groups (to 53.3% and 36% for Clearfil S3 Bond and Optibond FL, respectively) and was also more pronounced in the Clearfil S3 Bond group (p = 0.007). After 2 years, the simplified one-step self-etch adhesive Clearfil S3 Bond and the three-step etch-and-rinse adhesive Optibond FL were clinically equally successful, even though both adhesives were characterized by progressive degradation in marginal integrity. Clearfil S3 Bond exhibited more small enamel marginal defects and superficial marginal discolorations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21603966     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0565-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  40 in total

1.  Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Bart Van Meerbeek; Jan De Munck; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Satoshi Inoue; Marcos Vargas; Padmini Vijay; Kirsten Van Landuyt; Paul Lambrechts; Guido Vanherle
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.440

2.  Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Saulo Geraldeli
Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.843

3.  Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: etching effects on unground enamel.

Authors:  D H Pashley; F R Tay
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface.

Authors:  Lorenzo Breschi; Annalisa Mazzoni; Alessandra Ruggeri; Milena Cadenaro; Roberto Di Lenarda; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems.

Authors:  Lisa A Knobloch; David Gailey; Shereen Azer; William M Johnston; Nancy Clelland; Ronald E Kerby
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II--ultramorphological evaluation.

Authors:  Jorge Perdigão; Maria M Lopes; George Gomes
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.440

7.  Effect of air-drying and solvent evaporation on the strength of HEMA-rich versus HEMA-free one-step adhesives.

Authors:  Takatsumi Ikeda; Jan De Munck; Kenichi Shirai; Kazuhiro Hikita; Satoshi Inoue; Hidehiko Sano; Paul Lambrechts; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Bonding characteristics of newly developed all-in-one adhesives.

Authors:  S K Sidhu; Y Omata; T Tanaka; K Koshiro; D Spreafico; S Semeraro; D Mezzanzanica; H Sano
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching.

Authors:  M Peumans; J De Munck; K L Van Landuyt; A Poitevin; P Lambrechts; B Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Three-year clinical evaluation of a flowable and a hybrid resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Shisei Kubo; Hiroaki Yokota; Haruka Yokota; Yoshihiko Hayashi
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  The competition between enamel and dentin adhesion within a cavity: an in vitro evaluation of class V restorations.

Authors:  Tissiana Bortolotto; Wassila Doudou; Karl Heinz Kunzelmann; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Adhesive strategies in cervical lesions: systematic review and a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Fabiana Dias Simas Dreweck; Adrieli Burey; Marcelo de Oliveira Dreweck; Alessandro D Loguercio; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of two all-in-one adhesives bonded to non-carious cervical lesions--results at 3 years.

Authors:  Michael F Burrow; Martin J Tyas
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  The anatomy of non-carious cervical lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; E Kress; H Götz; K Taylor; I Willershausen; A Zampelis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Five-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions.

Authors:  Kirsten L Van Landuyt; Jan De Munck; R Banu Ermis; Marleen Peumans; Bart Van Meerbeek
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  One-year clinical evaluation of the bonding effectiveness of a one-step, self-etch adhesive in noncarious cervical lesion therapy.

Authors:  Babacar Faye; Mouhamed Sarr; Khaly Bane; Adjaratou Wakha Aidara; Seydina Ousmane Niang; Abdoul Wakhabe Kane
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2015-02-25

7.  One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities-a randomized clinical split-mouth study.

Authors:  Fabian Cieplik; Konstantin J Scholz; Julian C Anthony; Isabelle Tabenski; Sarah Ettenberger; Karl-Anton Hiller; Wolfgang Buchalla; Marianne Federlin
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.606

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.