Literature DB >> 21603882

A competing risks model for correlated data based on the subdistribution hazard.

Stephanie N Dixon1, Gerarda A Darlington, Anthony F Desmond.   

Abstract

Family-based follow-up study designs are important in epidemiology as they enable investigations of disease aggregation within families. Such studies are subject to methodological complications since data may include multiple endpoints as well as intra-family correlation. The methods herein are developed for the analysis of age of onset with multiple disease types for family-based follow-up studies. The proposed model expresses the marginalized frailty model in terms of the subdistribution hazards (SDH). As with Pipper and Martinussen's (Scand J Stat 30:509-521, 2003) model, the proposed multivariate SDH model yields marginal interpretations of the regression coefficients while allowing the correlation structure to be specified by a frailty term. Further, the proposed model allows for a direct investigation of the covariate effects on the cumulative incidence function since the SDH is modeled rather than the cause specific hazard. A simulation study suggests that the proposed model generally offers improved performance in terms of bias and efficiency when a sufficient number of events is observed. The proposed model also offers type I error rates close to nominal. The method is applied to a family-based study of breast cancer when death in absence of breast cancer is considered a competing risk. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21603882     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-011-9198-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  13 in total

1.  A two-stage estimator of the dependence parameter for the Clayton-Oakes model.

Authors:  D V Glidden
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Modelling clustered survival data from multicentre clinical trials.

Authors:  David V Glidden; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Semiparametric estimation of random effects using the Cox model based on the EM algorithm.

Authors:  J P Klein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Analysing multicentre competing risks data with a mixed proportional hazards model for the subdistribution.

Authors:  Sandrine Katsahian; Matthieu Resche-Rigon; Sylvie Chevret; Raphaël Porcher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On robustness of marginal regression coefficient estimates and hazard functions in multivariate survival analysis of family data when the frailty distribution is mis-specified.

Authors:  Li Hsu; Malka Gorfine; Kathleen Malone
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Competing risks analysis of correlated failure time data.

Authors:  Bingshu E Chen; Joan L Kramer; Mark H Greene; Philip S Rosenberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  On the Breslow estimator.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2007-09-02       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Assessing gamma frailty models for clustered failure time data.

Authors:  J H Shih; T A Louis
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Joan L Kramer; Isela A Velazquez; Bingshu E Chen; Philip S Rosenberg; Jeffery P Struewing; Mark H Greene
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Detection of eight BRCA1 mutations in 10 breast/ovarian cancer families, including 1 family with male breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Struewing; L C Brody; M R Erdos; R G Kase; T R Giambarresi; S A Smith; F S Collins; M A Tucker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bayesian inference of the fully specified subdistribution model for survival data with competing risks.

Authors:  Miaomiao Ge; Ming-Hui Chen
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-04-08       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Competing risks model for clustered data based on the subdistribution hazards with spatial random effects.

Authors:  Somayeh Momenyan; Farzane Ahmadi; Jalal Poorolajal
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Empirical comparison of methods for analyzing multiple time-to-event outcomes in a non-inferiority trial: a breast cancer study.

Authors:  Sameer Parpia; Lehana Thabane; Jim A Julian; Timothy J Whelan; Mark N Levine
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Investigating hospital heterogeneity with a competing risks frailty model.

Authors:  Anja J Rueten-Budde; Hein Putter; Marta Fiocco
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 2.373

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.