Literature DB >> 17680835

Competing risks analysis of correlated failure time data.

Bingshu E Chen1, Joan L Kramer, Mark H Greene, Philip S Rosenberg.   

Abstract

We develop methods for competing risks analysis when individual event times are correlated within clusters. Clustering arises naturally in clinical genetic studies and other settings. We develop a nonparametric estimator of cumulative incidence, and obtain robust pointwise standard errors that account for within-cluster correlation. We modify the two-sample Gray and Pepe-Mori tests for correlated competing risks data, and propose a simple two-sample test of the difference in cumulative incidence at a landmark time. In simulation studies, our estimators are asymptotically unbiased, and the modified test statistics control the type I error. The power of the respective two-sample tests is differentially sensitive to the degree of correlation; the optimal test depends on the alternative hypothesis of interest and the within-cluster correlation. For purposes of illustration, we apply our methods to a family-based prospective cohort study of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer families. For women with BRCA1 mutations, we estimate the cumulative incidence of breast cancer in the presence of competing mortality from ovarian cancer, accounting for significant within-family correlation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17680835      PMCID: PMC3125987          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00868.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  11 in total

1.  Nonparametric analysis of recurrent events and death.

Authors:  D Ghosh; D Y Lin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Tests for multivariate recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event.

Authors:  Bingshu Eric Chen; Richard J Cook
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Variance estimation for clustered recurrent event data with a small number of clusters.

Authors:  Douglas E Schaubel
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Comparing the small sample performance of several variance estimators under competing risks.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun; Zheng Yuan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Statistical methods for dependent competing risks.

Authors:  M L Moeschberger; J P Klein
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Non-parametric inference for cumulative incidence functions in competing risks studies.

Authors:  D Y Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data.

Authors:  M S Pepe; T R Fleming
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks.

Authors:  R L Prentice; J D Kalbfleisch; A V Peterson; N Flournoy; V T Farewell; N E Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data?

Authors:  M S Pepe; M Mori
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1993-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  16 in total

1.  Competing risks regression for clustered data.

Authors:  Bingqing Zhou; Jason Fine; Aurelien Latouche; Myriam Labopin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  On cross-odds ratio for multivariate competing risks data.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Yanqing Sun
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Differences in survival among multiple myeloma patients in the United States SEER population by neighborhood socioeconomic status and race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Maira A Castañeda-Avila; Bill M Jesdale; Ariel Beccia; Ganga S Bey; Mara M Epstein
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  A competing risks model for correlated data based on the subdistribution hazard.

Authors:  Stephanie N Dixon; Gerarda A Darlington; Anthony F Desmond
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2011-05-21       Impact factor: 1.588

5.  Estimating heritability for cause specific mortality based on twin studies.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Klaus K Holst; Jacob B Hjelmborg
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  A semiparametric random effects model for multivariate competing risks data.

Authors:  Thomas H Scheike; Yanqing Sun; Mei-Jie Zhang; Tina Kold Jensen
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.445

7.  Methods for generating paired competing risks data.

Authors:  Ruta Brazauskas; Jennifer Le-Rademacher
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Familial Risk and Heritability of Colorectal Cancer in the Nordic Twin Study of Cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca E Graff; Sören Möller; Michael N Passarelli; John S Witte; Axel Skytthe; Kaare Christensen; Qihua Tan; Hans-Olov Adami; Kamila Czene; Jennifer R Harris; Eero Pukkala; Jaakko Kaprio; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci; Jacob B Hjelmborg
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Marginal models for clustered time-to-event data with competing risks using pseudovalues.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Mei-Jie Zhang; John P Klein
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Frailty-based competing risks model for multivariate survival data.

Authors:  Malka Gorfine; Li Hsu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.